Wellbeing Budget largely delivers on wellbeing promise
Budget 2019 tells a story that’s skewed towards spending, materially downplaying the traditional financial context and its trajectory
Wellington, 30 May 2019 – “Despite the drama of the last few days, the much hyped ‘world-first’ Wellbeing Budget has largely delivered on its wellbeing promise, effectively spending everything and then some,” says Deloitte CEO Thomas Pippos.
“It was a midterm Budget by a centre left Government that felt more like an election year Budget. It was written in black ink, and was somewhat optimistic in economic tone, despite being written during an economic autumn.”
Budget 2019 overtly prioritised making good on infrastructure and social deficits. It assumed that the fiscal music will still be playing loud enough to stay in the black albeit that all indicators show that the volume is clearly decreasing. And there is effectively very little left in the tank in the near term, without going into the red, if the music stopped. So all good while the music is still playing. Not so good if it stops.
“Putting the wellbeing wrapping to the side then, what’s really different from previous Budgets other than a look and feel that showcases certain expenditure and outcomes in a modified way?” asks Mr Pippos.
Quite a lot it turns out. The Government’s risk appetite seems higher as the focus again has been on spending under a ‘wellbeing’ banner. And the detail outside of the spending is also quite muted.
Budgets are meant to be multidimensional, telling a balanced revenue and expenditure story. They are also meant to provide a narrative that looks to bring those numbers to life.
“The Budget was quite different on this front. It tells a story skewed towards spending, projected as being more palatable by being badged wellbeing. It’s very clever. The Government has sought to distance itself from traditional criticisms faced by centre left Governments while still doing what centre left Governments generally do,” says Mr Pippos.
It was deliberately focused on positively showcasing aspects of expenditure under a wellbeing banner and aligning the current Government with those programs. Materially muted was the traditional overall financial context and its trajectory, he adds.”
“As we saw in Australia, with global economic sentiment being cautious, will voters place the same weighting on wellbeing if economic fortunes start to turn? Time will tell as a lot can happen in a year; much of which is outside of New Zealand’s control,” concludes Mr Pippos.
About Deloitte in New Zealand
Deloitte New Zealand brings together more than 1300 specialist professionals providing audit, tax, technology and systems, strategy and performance improvement, risk management, corporate finance, business recovery, forensic and accounting services. Our people are based in Auckland, Hamilton, Rotorua, Wellington, Christchurch, Dunedin and Queenstown; serving clients that range from New Zealand’s largest companies and public sector organisations to smaller businesses with ambition to grow. Deloitte New Zealand is a member of Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited and of the Deloitte Network. For more information about Deloitte in New Zealand, go to our website www.deloitte.co.nz.
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and their affiliated entities are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.
About Deloitte Asia Pacific
Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited is a company limited by guarantee and a member firm of DTTL. Members of Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited and their related entities provide services in Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, East Timor, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Thailand, The Marshall Islands, The Northern Mariana Islands, The People’s Republic of China (incl. Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR), The Philippines and Vietnam, in each of which operations are conducted by separate and independent legal entities.