EHR convergence versus interoperability Bookmark has been added
EHR convergence versus interoperability
A key strategic question for health care providers
In response to increasing regulatory and consumer demands, more and more health care organisations are turning to technology to help them drive value. And a single electronic health record (EHR) platform can bring a lot of benefits. But what should health care providers consider before selecting an EHR strategy?
Driving value from electronic medical records
Regulatory requirements and industry demands continue to drive consolidation in the health care provider market. Virtually every health care organisation is wrestling with how to best build scale to cost to effectively respond to regulatory and health care consumer demands. Organisations will also need to consider how technology can help them drive value.
Converging to a single EHR platform can enable smooth sharing of patient data across all entities. But it requires a significant investment of time and resources. An EHR interoperability solution laid on top of existing systems is a faster and cheaper path to value. However, it may not fully realise the vision behind the original consolidation or provide the optimal platform for new value-creation opportunities in the newly formed organisation.
Such opportunities include enabling new avenues for revenue, enabling third-party/ancillary system rationalisation to lower information technology (IT) support costs, and accelerating the move of application and infrastructure technology portfolio to the cloud—and the associated business agility that brings. Beyond IT considerations, human capital challenges will present themselves, including decision governance and change management, during the rollout of IT system changes.
There’s no one answer for how an organisation should approach consolidation and expansion. However, armed with a solid organisational strategic plan, a structured evaluation process, and with insights into current and future tradeoffs, every organisation can plan for and implement a strategy to enable a successful transformation over the long term.
Convergence versus interoperability: Evaluating your strategy
Convergence to a single system platform allows for seamless patient information exchange between participating organisations. Standardised processes, platforms, and data and resulting rationalised application inventories across participating organisations enable higher levels of integration while simultaneously lowering costs for maintenance in the long run.
On the other hand, EHR interoperability makes it possible for disparate, heterogeneous systems to share patient-related information to support clinical workflows and business processes across the health system and organisational boundaries. Interfacing—a loosely coupled, asynchronous form of application integration—is at the heart of health care interoperability.
At the highest levels of interoperability, semantic interoperability provides the ability to not only exchange information through interfacing but also enable actionable insights and outcomes from the use of the exchanged information. The health care organisation’s challenge is to create a practical, yet forward-looking foundation for a semantic interoperability from a patchwork of available options.
There are several factors an organisation should evaluate when deciding on which strategy to pursue:
- Time and cost to achieve
- Addressing the future state of IT portfolio
- Driving organisational and data standards
- Organisational structure and governance.
Regardless of the decision to converge to a single system platform or to implement an EHR interoperability solution, newly formed health systems may be tempted to approach the resultant IT implementation in the same way as previous rip-and-replace technology implementation projects. While a convergence or interoperability project will follow the same life cycle as an implementation, it should be treated more like a post-merger integration project.
IT considerations for electronic health records
As health systems expand their footprint through mergers and acquisitions and partnerships, it’s crucial to engage and consult IT early and often. Technology considerations can even be a driver for deal considerations for some health care organisations.
IT can help identify opportunities by offering a different lens on the strategic alternatives being considered. It also enables much better clarity in understanding the risk, timeline, and cost associated with a convergence or interoperability approach.
Under the framework of value-based care and patient-driven outcomes, it’s essential for health systems to do more with less. This underscores the importance for post-merger entities to share patient information efficiently and effectively. The ability to share this information in real time across the organisation enables the health system to reduce operational redundancies and maximise service to their patients.
When making strategic IT decisions, each health system’s distinct composition needs to be evaluated in the context of the patients they serve, geographic footprint, and overall organisational make-up. This requires health care organisations to critically evaluate their application portfolio, organisational structure, and market position to decide how best to share integral patient information across the health system and serve their patients into the future.
Published: October 2018
EHR convergence versus interoperability
Download the report