FTSE 250 bosses’ total pay falls slightly in 2017 as shareholder pressure continues over pay packages has been saved
FTSE 250 bosses’ total pay falls slightly in 2017 as shareholder pressure continues over pay packages
28 September 2018
- Figures contrast with increase for chief executives in FTSE 100 over same period
- Proxy agencies maintained pressure despite changes to remuneration structures
The median amount paid to FTSE 250 chief executives in 2017 fell by 4%, from £1.75 million in 2016 to £1.68 million, according to Deloitte’s annual FTSE 250 Remuneration Report. The fall came as companies continued to move towards best-practice remuneration structures in the face of ongoing pressure from shareholders over pay and reward programmes.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) issued ‘against’ recommendations in respect of annual remuneration reports at 17% of FTSE 250 firms’ Annual General Meetings (AGMs) during the 2018 shareholder season, slightly higher than last year. Of the FTSE 250 companies holding their AGMs so far in 2018, 10% have received ‘low votes’ of less than 80% shareholders in favour of the annual remuneration report. Around half of these companies also received low shareholder votes last year.
The drop in chief executives’ pay this year is in contrast with their peers in the FTSE 100, whose total pay increased by 12% in 2017. The median salary increase for FTSE 250 chief executives remained at around 2%, with around a third receiving no salary increase at all.
Bonus pay-outs were up, however, with FTSE 250 bosses taking a median of 75% of their maximum bonus opportunity, compared to 68% last year. The median vesting of performance share plan awards dropped to 48% of maximum this year, compared to 60% last year.
Mitul Shah, reward partner at Deloitte commented: “Despite seeing a more stable picture in terms of pay levels and opportunities, the 2018 AGM season has demonstrated that a challenging shareholder environment continues for FTSE 250 companies.
“This year we have seen a particular focus on those companies that have failed to respond to shareholder concerns raised in previous years, showing the importance of companies listening to, and acting on, shareholder feedback”.
In around three-quarters of performance share plans no shares will be released to executives until after five years (51% last year), which is now aligned with FTSE 100 practice. This trend is expected to continue following recent changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code.
In addition, 14% of companies increased their executive shareholding requirements in the last year, and nearly all (93%) of chief executives are now required to hold at least 200% of salary in shares. Eight companies now operate post-termination shareholding requirements for executives (compared to one last year), a feature also highlighted in the new UK Corporate Governance Code.
Breaking the ‘one size fits all’ pay model?
There have also been signs that shareholders can be supportive of more innovative incentive arrangements, with two FTSE 250 companies receiving the support of their shareholders in adopting restricted share plans.
Mitul Shah, reward partner at Deloitte, concluded: “Investors have shown that they can be more receptive to FTSE 250 companies proposing alternative models of pay this year, where these alternatives are supported by a robust business rationale and tailored in the right way.
“Hopefully we will see this trend grow as well as a more positive dialogue between companies and shareholders regarding how more innovative and diverse structures could be used.”
Notes to editors
- Remuneration data ‘2017’ captures financial year ends between March 2017 to February 2018.
- Voting outcomes ‘this year’ refers to AGMs held in the calendar year to 31st July 2018. Voting outcomes ‘last year’ refers to the calendar year 2017.
- Maximum is the maximum incentive opportunity available.
- Vesting refers to the % of maximum that has been paid out under a long-term incentive plan.
- The Investment Association now publishes a register of companies that receive ‘significant opposition’ from shareholders on AGM resolutions. For the purposes of the register, support of less than 80% is considered to be significant.
In this press release references to “Deloitte” are references to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”) a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms.
Deloitte LLP is a subsidiary of Deloitte NWE LLP, which is a member firm of
The information contained in this press release is correct at the time of going to press.
For more information, please visit www.deloitte.co.uk
Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited