Minimizing goodwill impairment differences globally
No fast or simple solution
A crucial exercise for acquisitive businesses is to routinely assess the goodwill booked in an acquisition to determine whether there has been any impairment and, if so, how much. Why? It is apparent that in recent years there have often been notable differences in goodwill impairment conclusions across the world. So what is the root cause or causes of these differences? Varying valuation practice due to inconsistent global standards? Cultural or language differences? Inconsistent application of the accounting and auditing standards? This article explores some of these issues for insights.
As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which provides forensic, dispute, and other consulting services, and its affiliate, Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP, which provides a wide range of advisory and analytics services. Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP is not a certified public accounting firm. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.