Heads Up — FASB confirms decision to defer effective date of new revenue standard by one year has been added to your bookmarks.
Heads Up — FASB confirms decision to defer effective date of new revenue standard by one year
At its July 9, 2015, meeting, the FASB reaffirmed the guidance in its April 2015 proposed ASU that defers for one year the effective date of the new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09) for both public and nonpublic entities reporting under U.S. GAAP and allows early adoption as of the original effective date.
After reviewing and discussing the feedback received, the Board decided to adopt the standard as originally proposed. Thus, the final ASU, which is expected to be issued in the coming weeks, will require the following:
- For public entities, the standard will be effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption will be permitted as of the original effective date in ASU 2014-09 (i.e., annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods).
- For nonpublic entities, the standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Nonpublic entities can also elect to early adopt the standard as of the following:
- Annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods.
- Annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning one year after the annual reporting period of initial application of the new standard.
The FASB’s final decision comes after a month-long comment period that closed on May 29, 2015. Comment-letter respondents unanimously supported the deferral of the effective date by at least one year, stating that the additional time would allow for more successful implementation of the requirements as entities work through issues associated with IT solutions and adoption of new processes and controls. Respondents had varying views on the other questions posed, including whether the deferral should be two years rather than one and to what extent (if at all) early adoption should be permitted.
Although the Board’s final decision was to retain the guidance from the proposal, some Board members expressed differing views on the various options at the meeting. For instance, one Board member questioned the early-adoption option, stating that investors could become confused by the incomparability that would result from entities’ adoption of the guidance at different times and their use of different transition methods. In addition, some members reiterated their concern that a one-year deferral may not give entities enough time, while others were concerned that an additional year (i.e., a two-year deferral) would delay implementation efforts. Further, some members supported a one-year deferral in light of the IASB’s parallel proposal to defer the effective date of its counterpart standard, IFRS 15, by one year.
Editor’s Note: The IASB issued an exposure draft (ED) in May 2015 to seek feedback on its tentative decision to defer the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year. If finalized, the IASB’s proposal would be consistent with the FASB’s decision. Comments on the ED were due by July 3, 2015. The IASB is expected to discuss feedback received and make a final decision at its meeting during the week of July 20.
Subscribe and Archives
Heads Up newsletters, published as warranted, analyze important accounting developments, such as new FASB and IASB pronouncements or exposure drafts. Concise examples and answers to frequently asked questions assist readers in understanding and implementing the critical guidance.