First comes the workforce has been saved
Cover art by: Daniel Hertzberg.
Sixty per cent of workers across Europe claim to have had no major difficulty adapting to COVID-19–inflicted changes, according to Deloitte’s European Workforce Survey. It is a reassuring finding, but it should do more than just bring relief. Organisations should examine the responses of their workforces. What were their coping mechanisms? What brought them success in the face of the pandemic’s ever-present and evolving threat?
By gleaning insights from individuals, it is possible also to glimpse a future of work framework that could achieve the same kind of resilience and adaptability. We have already learnt lessons that can be applied to overhauling organisational strategies and setting the stage for success.
Deloitte’s research has revealed values and trends that should not be ignored by any organisation that prioritises resilience in an uncertain future. Below we deepdive into one of the most useful findings: the revelation that although workers broadly agree on well-being – belonging and ethics being of paramount concern1 – supporting these values is not achieved by rolling out a stock of best practices. Workers’ pandemic experiences have not been uniform, and unique situations call for unique accommodations. Rather than cleave to old paradigms, business leaders should be investing in understanding their workers’ varied and complex needs – now and projecting beyond COVID-19. If not, leaders risk allowing productivity and morale to wane by implementing ineffective measures.
The pandemic’s acceleration of technology uptake should certainly be factored into any future of work planning but should not take precedence over workers’ needs and desires. Any future of work framework should incorporate strategies that value human capital as much as technology. Ideally, business leaders will co-create a new framework with input from their workforce. In so doing they will empower the workforce to perform well and ensure that any future conflicts are easily surmounted.
In June 2020, to amplify the ‘voice of the workforce’, Deloitte conducted the European Workforce Survey, reaching out to more than 10,000 employees across seven European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom). The survey was conducted online, and the sample was restricted to people currently employed (even if currently furloughed or on a zero-hours contract). Fifty per cent of the sample was made up of workers aged 50 or older and the other half, workers older than 18 but younger than 50. Within these two major age groups, the age and gender composition of the sample was set to resemble the current composition of the workforce in each country. Professional translators adapted the questionnaire into local languages, and native language professionals refined the translations to optimise the comprehensibility of the questions.
It is useful to consider Deloitte’s European Workforce Survey analysis in the context of a broader phenomenon seen across organisations where technology is often identified as the main driver of enterprise value and human interests are portrayed as antithetical to the fullest capitalisation of technology.2 What the European workforce tells us is that the human factor is critical to easing work’s transition to the new situations that emerge after the pandemic.3
It is clear that business leaders should be considering human capital and technology together, not separately. Those who recognise that they are equally important can adapt their organisations faster to new modes of working and business, placing them ahead of the game once the pandemic becomes a distant memory.
If human factors are lacking attention, it is worth first exploring what those factors are. ‘Well-being’ and ‘belonging’ ranked at the top of the Global Human Capital Trends, with 80 per cent and 79 per cent of organisations, respectively, considering them fundamental for their success.4 ‘Ethics’ was ranked third. The survey was conducted before the pandemic struck and many workers retreated into their new homeworking environment.
We can predict that the factors highlighted before are valued even more today. Many organisations quickly overcame technological hurdles and equipped workers to stay connected remotely, but human factors seem to be regarded as more supportive when adjusting to new ways of working. While trust from peers and leadership was an important factor to help through the transition for everyone, younger workers were more likely to name their professional networks as influencing their ability to adapt (see figure 1).
For employers, human factors are not as easily supplied as technological solutions. But they are increasingly seen as organisational priorities; the three prevailing values cited above – well-being, belonging and ethics – fit within today’s aspirational model of a social enterprise. In Deloitte’s 2020 Global Human Capital Trends, we described such an enterprise as embodying purpose, potential and perspective: three attributes encompassing a host of factors that prioritise individuals and their contributions (figure 2).5 Ethics fits under the ‘perspective’ umbrella, which means embracing an orientation that focuses on creating future, as well as current, value. Well-being and belonging fit under the ‘purpose’ umbrella: embedding meaning into every aspect of work, every day.
Below we focus on the top two factors, well-being and belonging. These can be seen as the antidote to specific fears and concerns raised by European workers, which include losing the opportunity to work in a close-knit environment and having limited employee interactions. Almost one in three employees said they worried about human relationships deteriorating and trust diminishing at work in the future (figure 3). With such concerns brought to light, organisations are being given a wake-up call – a chance to change direction if their path ahead does not prioritise these human factors.
Well-being means living and performing at your best. Typical well-being programmes try to prioritise the individual at work, rather than in work. If organisations can upset that notion to design well-being measures that fit into the work itself, the employees’ sense of contribution is likely to be more profound and their performance enhanced.6
The European Workforce Survey showed that when the pandemic hit, 36 per cent of workers who had clear goals and a higher degree of autonomy in decision-making had difficulty adapting to their new environments and situations. By contrast, 51 per cent of workers who do not describe their working environment as one of diffuse leadership reported having difficulty adapting to one or more changes (figure 4).
Starting with the organisational and HR data readily available to most organisations, business leaders should be getting to know the specific needs and preferences of their staff. That kind of understanding is necessary to build appropriate tools and strategies. Open discussions should be sought with individuals, to inquire how they are doing and find out if there are any problems. Research has shown that employees who feel their companies care for them as individuals have greater commitment, can be more flexible and enjoy their work more.7
Business leaders should also establish the right level of ownership for well-being,8 considering which group has the greatest ability to influence the design of work. With this groundwork in place, strategies for well-being in day-to-day work can begin to be designed, with input from the workers themselves, based on their needs and desires. Only when these aspects are well understood should organisations start to build the new framework to foster well-being.
Three out of every four respondents to the Global Human Capital Trends survey said ethics is a crucial element of their operations. To concretely and practically promote the other most valued elements – well-being and belonging – an ethical pact is needed: shared between employer and employee, and based on transparency, trust and respect. The pact would not usually be a written one, but it would be manifested in every strategy the organisation implements. It is evidenced by business leaders ‘practising what they preach’ – applying appropriate strategies to daily working life, and sticking to them. It is also standing firm behind performance assessments and surveillance. And it supports workers to work autonomously, trusting that their efforts are being ‘seen’. Such assurances should help alleviate workers’ concerns about the future and whether they and the company can adapt to new events.
In building a tailored, future-proof framework that promotes well-being, the following principles should be applied:
Balance is not just a ‘nice to have’; it is a key enabler that ensures well-being in our lives and performance and productivity at work. To bring balance, organisations can be as creative as they feel necessary. Effectiveness will, however, depend on whether organisational leaders have done their research and properly understand the needs and desires of their own workforce so they can gauge actions, and ways of communicating options, that will work for them.
In a world that is now more connected than ever, it may seem odd that belonging was deemed one of the two greatest needs in organisations today, according to our Global Human Capital Trends report. But if you consider our polarised society, in which workers might struggle to find meaning and solidarity, it is not hard to understand that they look in the workplace for purpose and a community of people with common values.9
Even though many employees enjoy increased autonomy and report little difficulty in adopting flexible work schedules, working from home for longer periods can create a sense of alienation and loneliness.10 A sense of belonging was once found in the spontaneous coffee break, handshake or even smile when passing someone in the hallway. These need to be reconsidered to ensure that belonging becomes a key component of any future of work framework.
According to Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends, experiencing belonging as a worker is the outcome of three mutually reinforcing attributes: comfort felt in your work environment, connection to the people you work with and your contributions coming to life within the organisation.11 These elements represent an evolution – comfort must be established before connection can be fostered, and so on.12 How can all of these elements be applied in a remote context, where being physically close is impossible? What tools do organisations possess to promote them?
1. Creating comfort
The organisation does have the power to foster feelings ofrespect and comfort. Here again we find that ethics plays a big role. That well-being ‘pact’ mentioned earlier, between employees and employer, should reflect the best intentions of both parties.13 In addition, organisations can promote mutual trust and transparency via genuine and unfiltered communications from the company.
Companies that are consistent and clear in their messaging, highlight their priorities, and share their successes and failures equally tend to succeed in keeping their workforce engaged better than others, based on what we have seen when interacting with numerous clients. Organisations with an inclusive culture that fosters respect have shown themselves to be twice as likely to meet or exceed financial targets, three times as likely to be high performing, six times more likely to be innovative and agile, and eight times more likely to achieve better business outcomes.14
2. Enabling connection
The digital context in which we are now operating has all but eliminated so-called peripheral or subsidiary relationships at work. Communications are largely limited to only the people we work with directly. This means that individuals are missing out on those second-degree exchanges that in many cases are the source of added creativity and strong professional networks. This applies to established employees, as well as those who join an organisation without ever having seen the workplace or their colleagues. Leaders need to think carefully about how to enable connections among a remote workforce and how to create a balance between positive reinforcement and requiring employees to change their way of working.
3. Emphasising contribution
Through the work they deliver, employees are expected to contribute to the organisation’s goals. In a remote working world this depends on trustworthy employer-employee relationships. The supervisor manages with the assumption that everyone is contributing equally and responsibly, even though out of sight, and the worker performs and delivers without being seen or guided. Establishing such a relationship of mutual trust will ensure that remote performance is comparable to office performance.
However, even with trustworthy relationships and solid performance, workers may not perceive their work as a contribution of value. Many people have experienced a profound shift in how they see their ability to contribute. They need to feel that their contributions are making a difference to achieving shared goals, but such signs can be harder to identify when a workforce is dispersed. The organisation has a responsibility to provide clear mechanisms, such as incentives and peer/supervisor feedback.15
For example, new joiners (whether permanent staff or contractors) do not always find integration and/or the onboarding process compelling when it takes place at a distance. Indeed, about one in four respondents is concerned that in the future work environment it will be difficult for new hires and contractors to properly integrate in the organisation (figure 3). Consider also the time-worn schemes of remuneration and appraisal, which used to be tied to an ongoing evaluation that was based on presence and hours worked. Today, almost one in every five employees expects performance evaluation to focus more on results and achievements.16 If organisations cannot adjust their systems of performance evaluation to reflect flexibility and autonomy, the enjoyment of any benefits brought by flexible working will likely diminish.17
For an organisation to promote belonging based on contribution, it is not necessary for people to have the same views or conform to a single cultural template. The focus should be on diversity of thought but shared outcomes – discussions that feature a variety of perspectives but end in agreement. When teams are united by a common purpose, figuring out how to achieve that purpose is not divisive. It is an invitation to share ideas, which adds transparency and helps enhance the individual’s sense of belonging.
As with any future of work strategy, steps to foster belonging should be designed carefully and with the organisation’s specific workforce squarely in mind. Success can be measured by workers seeing and appreciating how their individual work helps advance goals they support and find meaningful. In an environment of this kind they are more likely to be engaged and motivated, and to perform well.18
It is to be hoped that we are not in the eye of the storm but rather beyond the alarming initial stage of pandemic responses. It is a learning moment: a time to reflect on what has worked well and use those lessons to fundamentally redesign work, focusing on outputs rather than activities.19 Behind every new future of work framework, three fundamental tenets should be evident: trust, autonomy, and ensuring the worker can continue to adapt to a rapidly changing future.Our working world has changed immensely, but pre-pandemic values and concerns remain, and have even intensified. By listening to the workers, then embedding well-being, belonging and ethics into every aspect of the design and delivery of work itself, an organisation gives its workforce the means to live and perform at their best.20
Cover art by: Daniel Hertzberg.