Viewing offline content

Limited functionality available

Dismiss
Deloitte South Africa
  • Services

    What's new

    • Deloitte Digital

    • Deloitte Africa Centre for Corporate Governance

      The Deloitte Africa Center for Corporate Governance offers a number of resources for executives, directors, and others who are active in governance.

    • Corporate Reporting Reform

      View our latest events on corporate reporting reform.

    • Audit & Assurance

      • Audit & Assurance Insights
      • Centre for Corporate Governance
    • Consulting

      • Strategy
      • Customer and Marketing
      • Core Business Operations
      • Human Capital
      • Enterprise Technology & Performance
      • Managed Services
      • Growth Platforms
    • Financial Advisory

      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Turnaround and Restructuring
      • Forensics
    • Risk Advisory

      • Internal Control & Assurance
      • Regulatory Risk
      • IT & Specialised Assurance
      • Cyber Risk
      • Analytics
    • Tax & Legal

      • Outsourced Tax Compliance
      • Tax Technology Consulting
      • Tax Advisory and Transactions
      • Mobility, Payroll, Immigration
      • Workforce, Analytics
      • Reward, Employment Tax
      • Legal Services
      • South African Budget
      • Tax News and Trends
    • Deloitte Private

  • Industries

    What's new

    • Deloitte perspectives

      Leadership perspectives from across the globe.

    • Future of Mobility

      Learn how this new reality is coming together and what it will mean for you and your industry.

    • Deloitte Africa Insights

      Access the latest thought leadership on industry insights, country reports and economic developments in Africa.

    • Consumer

      • Automotive
      • Consumer Products
      • Retail, Wholesale & Distribution
      • Transportation, Hospitality & Services
    • Energy & Resources

      • Energy & Chemicals
      • Mining & Metals
      • Power, Utilities & Renewables
      • Industrial Products & Construction
    • Financial Services

      • Insurance
      • Banking & Securities
      • Investment Management
      • Actuarial & Insurance Solutions
      • Real Estate
    • Life Sciences & Healthcare

      • Life Sciences
      • Health Care
      • The Africa Deloitte Health Equity Institute
    • Government and Public Services

      • Infrastructure, Transport & Regional Government
      • Central Government
      • Defence, Security & Justice
      • Health & Human Services
    • Technology, Media & Telecom

      • Technology
      • Media & Entertainment
      • Telecom, Media & Entertainment
      • Predictions
  • Insights

    Deloitte Insights

    What's new

    • Deloitte Insights Magazine

      Explore the latest issue now

    • Deloitte Insights app

      Go straight to smart with daily updates on your mobile device

    • Weekly economic update

      See what's happening this week and the impact on your business

    • Strategy

      • Business Strategy & Growth
      • Digital Transformation
      • Governance & Board
      • Innovation
      • Marketing & Sales
      • Private Enterprise
    • Economy & Society

      • Economy
      • Environmental, Social, & Governance
      • Health Equity
      • Trust
      • Mobility
    • Organization

      • Operations
      • Finance & Tax
      • Risk & Regulation
      • Supply Chain
      • Smart Manufacturing
    • People

      • Leadership
      • Talent & Work
      • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Technology

      • Data & Analytics
      • Emerging Technologies
      • Technology Management
    • Industries

      • Consumer
      • Energy, Resources, & Industrials
      • Financial Services
      • Government & Public Services
      • Life Sciences & Health Care
      • Technology, Media, & Telecommunications
    • Spotlight

      • Deloitte Insights Magazine
      • Press Room Podcasts
      • Weekly Economic Update
      • COVID-19
      • Resilience
      • Top 10 reading guide
  • Careers

    What's new

    • Job search

    • Experienced Hires

    • Executives

    • Students

    • Life at Deloitte

    • Alumni

  • ZA-EN Location: South Africa-English  
  • ZA-EN Location: South Africa-English  
    • Dashboard
    • Saved items
    • Content feed
    • Profile/Interests
    • Account settings
    • Subscriptions

Welcome back

Still not a member? Join My Deloitte

Delivering innovative, better, and lower-cost state government

by William D. Eggers, Christina Dorfhuber, Christopher Rose
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email
Deloitte Insights
  • Strategy
    Strategy
    Strategy
    • Business Strategy & Growth
    • Digital Transformation
    • Governance & Board
    • Innovation
    • Marketing & Sales
    • Private Enterprise
  • Economy & Society
    Economy & Society
    Economy & Society
    • Economy
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Health Equity
    • Trust
    • Mobility
  • Organization
    Organization
    Organization
    • Operations
    • Finance & Tax
    • Risk & Regulation
    • Supply Chain
    • Smart Manufacturing
  • People
    People
    People
    • Leadership
    • Talent & Work
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
  • Technology
    Technology
    Technology
    • Data & Analytics
    • Emerging Technologies
    • Technology Management
  • Industries
    Industries
    Industries
    • Consumer
    • Energy, Resources, & Industrials
    • Financial Services
    • Government & Public Services
    • Life Sciences & Health Care
    • Tech, Media, & Telecom
  • Spotlight
    Spotlight
    Spotlight
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts
    • Weekly Economic Update
    • COVID-19
    • Resilience
    • Top 10 reading guide
    • ZA-EN Location: South Africa-English  
      • Dashboard
      • Saved items
      • Content feed
      • Profile/Interests
      • Account settings
      • Subscriptions
    07 February 2018

    Delivering innovative, better, and lower-cost state government The State Policy Road Map: Solutions for the Journey Ahead

    07 February 2018
    • William D. Eggers United States
    • Christina Dorfhuber United States
    • Christopher Rose United States
    • Save for later
    • Download
    • Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on Linkedin
      • Share by email

    Such technologies as digital government, online self-service, and artificial intelligence offer government leaders a chance to rethink workflows and reduce costs often while enhancing service levels.

    What is the issue?

    A decade after the Great Recession, a number of states still face budget challenges. In 2015, 22 states had expenditures exceeding total revenues;1 30 states faced revenue shortfalls in 2017 and 2018 or both, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.2 Like always, money is tight.

    Most governors are looking for ways to reduce costs without cutting programs. While you may think most of the low-hanging fruit has already been picked, such strategies do exist.

    Learn more

    View the full collection

    Subscribe to receive Public Sector content

    View the table of contents and create a custom PDF, or download the full collection

    Sign up for the webcast

    An ongoing challenge facing public operations is the trade-off between cost and quality. One way state leaders can address this challenge is to embrace new thinking and break the trade-offs through innovation. In the private sector, this takes the shape of making a better product for lower cost. For example, in the past, you could either serve lots of people with a standard product, or a small number of people with a customized product. Today, through personalization technologies, there is the potential to do both, and break the trade-off to offer “mass customization.”

    In government, innovations that break the trade-offs can involve new technologies, new policies, or new service models to deliver equal or better quality for less money. Nesta, a UK-based think tank, calls such an approach “radical efficiency”: the art of developing different and better models—not just lower-cost versions of existing ones.3

    Issue by the numbers: Breaking the cost-quality trade-off

    • Thirty states face expenditures exceeding total revenues in FY17, FY18, or both (figure 3).4
    • Some states have fallen further behind on funding their employee pension systems. The gap between state pension liabilities and assets grew to $1.1 trillion in 2015.5
    • Huge savings may be possible from new automation technologies. The Deloitte Center for Government Insights projects that state governments can realize time savings of between 4 and 30 percent by implementing automation technology in the next 5–7 years. This translates to between $119 million and $931 million in potential annual savings.6

    Thirty states addressed or will address revenue shortfalls in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, or both

    How can state leadership tackle the issue?

    A new administration can be an opportunity for state leaders to look at state operations with a fresh set of eyes. Rapid changes in technology can create a chance to borrow great ideas from commercial best practices. Advances in understanding the customer experience likewise offer opportunities.

    But what’s the best way to approach such an effort?

    A methodical approach

    Rather than starting with a set of preconceived notions and a few “prime targets” for cost reduction, taking a more methodical approach may be more effective. Start with analyzing your data—expenditure data, budget data, HR data, and performance data. The results of the analysis will identify some potential focus areas. With these focus areas identified, cast a wide net to generate ideas. Reach out to employees, senior government executives, think tanks, consultants, academics, and other partners.

    The next step is key. How to choose from among the (hopefully) long list of cost-reduction ideas? One of the best approaches is to treat each idea as a “hypothesis” and critically test that idea against a set of criteria, including:

    • Investment required
    • Time horizon
    • Likely return on investment
    • Complexity and risk
    • Impact on service levels
    • Impact on state employees

    This step can also include input from focus groups, surveys, and other “crowdsourcing” instruments. By critically testing these hypotheses up front, you can bring the best ideas forward.

    Now, you can prioritize these ideas and start to execute with confidence. With a data-driven approach, you are more likely to pull the right levers and overcome possible resistance.

    There may be opportunities for “incremental” cost savings—but saving even a small percentage of a large operation can generate meaningful savings. There may also be opportunities for more dramatic savings. For example, if you charge $20 for annual license renewals, a policy change could enable you to charge $60 for a three-year renewal instead—and cut the total number of transactions by 67 percent.

    The break-the-trade-off ideas will likely fall into several different buckets.

    “Break the trade-off strategies” vs. zero-sum strategies

    Organizing for ongoing efficiency improvement

    Develop institutional capabilities

    Some states have created independent agencies that conduct periodic top-to-bottom reviews of state programs, agencies, and departments and make recommendations for maintaining, eliminating, redesigning, or restructuring them. Texas is one state with robust independent review capabilities. Created in the wake of a recession-led budget deficit, the Texas Performance Review (TPR), launched in 1991, resulted in savings of over $10 billion over the course of the next decade.7 Meanwhile, the Texas Sunset Commission has resulted in $981 million in savings and increased revenues over its 33-year history.8

    Other states such as Arizona and Washington State are adopting lean thinking to maximize project impact while reducing waste.9 For instance, Arizona launched a results-driven management system called Arizona Management System based on lean principles. The idea was to track and improve state agencies’ performance on a regular basis, honing customer value. As a part of this initiative, the state has revised its processes and policies, saving millions. One such revised process is data-driven procurement, which helped Arizona achieve $20.4 million savings in 2016 alone.10 Similarly, following lean thinking, Washington State automated the monthly manual billing process, which involved 300+ organizations, generating savings estimated at $500,000.11

    Build a balanced portfolio

    To achieve results, leaders can build achievable, robust programs that contain a portfolio of initiatives to potentially reduce costs. Some pitfalls can include taking on too many initiatives at once and constructing a cost-reduction portfolio that lacks balance and coherence. This can lead to one initiative diluting the benefits of another and, possibly, a wider failure of confidence in the whole program.

    Cost savings take a varying amount of time to extract. Think fast money and slow money. Fast money can come from opportunities that are not particularly complex to implement and where savings can be realized more quickly. Slower money can come from projects that are more complex, that may require a greater level of attention and management, or that have more dependencies with other projects underway. It can take years, for example, to extract savings from shared services, consolidation, and other changes in the government’s operating model. Additionally, the timeframe may be affected by the level of risk involved in the opportunity.

    Workforce strategies

    Personnel costs can represent a large chunk of state budgets. In looking for possible savings, state leaders may consider looking at functions that involve large numbers of public employees.

    Outsourcing, automation, self-service, and other forms of alternative service delivery are several options state leaders can consider. Can the function be performed through self-service? Can parts or all of it be automated? Can it be contracted out or done through a public partnership? Can policy changes reduce effort with little or no impact on outcomes?

    Careful workforce planning that takes advantage of natural attrition can help to minimize adverse impact on state employees.

    Operating model: Reconfiguring bureaucratic structures to achieve policy outcomes in a different way

    Often, the fiscal gap is so big that efficiency savings alone may not suffice. State officials can identify cost-reduction opportunities that change the shape and the way they do business, allowing services and policies to be delivered in a different way. This can take many forms, depending on the circumstances of the organization in question. Some common techniques that can help reduce costs through operating model change include:

    • Implement shared services: Share back-office functions (for example, HR, finance, procurement) and delivery models with other departments or public bodies, including boards and commissions.
    • Reduce overlap: Adjust the responsibilities of state agencies and departments by merging or modifying programs to reduce overlap.
    • Rationalize: Reduce the number of agencies, units of local government, and “arm’s-length bodies” involved in delivering public services.
    • Redesign: Adjust organizational hierarchies to increase spans of control and “delayer” middle-management roles through new workforce civil service paradigms and other means.

    Changing the operating model can be harder than driving out efficiency savings because it can require state agencies and employees to fundamentally alter their ways of working and to adapt to a larger degree of change.

    Policy choices: Changing costs without sacrificing mission

    Policy choices can be a sensitive part of any cost-reduction program because they can affect large constituencies external to government. But this also represents an area where cost savings can be found without undue impact on core services. While some policy changes may require legislation, others may be accomplished through executive action.

    Policy choices, in some cases, are rooted in long-ago decisions that established processes appropriate for the time but are no longer necessary due to technology changes. Does it really make sense to publish certain public notices in newspapers in the Internet age? Does having a different license plate for each county in the state justify the costs of managing multiple inventories? For that matter, is having a service office in each and every county the best use of scarce resources?

    Reexamining existing policies can also reveal current practices that may be needlessly causing inconvenience to citizens. What is really gained by requiring documents to be notarized? Why can’t someone simply take a photo of his or her latest utility bill and email it in, rather than dealing with the hassle of finding an envelope and stamp to mail in a paper copy?

    In some cases, there may be good reasons for continuing the current practices, but it never hurts to ask questions. Policy choices are driven by leadership, and cost-saving directives can often provide a useful spur to creative policy thinking.

    Technology- and data-driven solutions

    Rapid advances in technology, in areas including robotics, cognitive computing, and cloud, mean that almost every aspect of state operations can be reevaluated for streamlining through new technology.

    In the past, tech upgrades in state government were often synonymous with large system implementations that were slow and costly to implement. Some systems will still fall under this category, but there are increasing places where more “lightweight” automation or cloud IT solutions can yield savings with less risk, less cost, and a faster payback in a shorter period of time.

    The tech revolution is reshaping the economy, and state government is a target-rich environment for opportunities to use automation to improve efficiency. Mobile applications, for example, can allow field workers, such as social workers, to input and access critical data on-site, creating huge efficiencies without incurring massive costs.

    Digital government, online self-service, artificial intelligence, and a host of other technologies offer a chance to rethink workflows, reduce costs, and in many cases to do so while enhancing service levels.

    In addition, technology now allows for data-driven solutions that, through predictive analytics, can dramatically improve the allocation of state resources, from people to facilities to budget dollars.

    AI-augmented government

    Read more about how state governments can apply cognitive technologies in AI-augmented Government.

    Management by data to optimize programs and operations

    Big advances in data analytics in recent years can help states save time, money, and energy.12 By making decisions based on data rather than intuition, states can allocate budget resources to maximum effect.

    Consider Oregon, a leading state in using data to advance more evidence-based programs and services. The state targets many of its grants to local public safety agencies to test strategies that reduce recidivism and save prison costs. In human services, the state’s Pay for Prevention initiative directs funds to evidence-based interventions with the goal of preventing children and youth from entering the state’s child welfare and foster care systems in the first place, ultimately saving tax dollars.13

    Asset management

    From real estate and fleet maintenance to procurement and energy efficiency, state governments control significant assets. In some cases, practices established in the past may not be optimal today in light of new technologies or new practices. For example, states are now able to better understand usage patterns in offices and design flexible spaces that meet the needs of the modern and often mobile workforce. This can result in avoiding construction of new buildings or reducing the total square footage needed to support the existing workforce.

    Internal operations

    Robotic process automation (RPA) can replace the keystrokes on scores of repetitive manual tasks sometimes common in internal operations, allowing workers to focus on higher-value work. These technologies can take over repetitive tasks from human workers, freeing up those workers to perform more high-value activities. Bots, which mimic the actions of human workers, can automate processes in human resources, finance, payroll, IT, and procurement (figure 4).

    Key functions replaced by bots

    Procurement rules and hiring processes are also potential targets for innovation. Finance and budgeting functions can be dispersed and highly manual.

    Cutting fraud, waste, and abuse

    Elimination of fraud, waste, and abuse is the equivalent of found money—money that can be spent on delivering real value.

    Shutting down fraud, waste, and abuse

    Read more about fighting fraud, waste, and abuse in Shutting down fraud, waste, and abuse.

    Fraud perpetrators can be highly inventive. Keeping pace with them requires states to build anti-fraud systems that contain all relevant information and are capable of learning new fraud patterns on the fly. However, new tools that allow states to employ artificial intelligence-enabled fraud detection are coming online and can help states build such systems.

    Tennessee’s Medicaid program TennCare took a holistic approach when it enforced statewide sharing of suspected fraudulent provider lists. The relatively simple policy, procedure, and technology changes associated with this move allowed Tennessee to save $50 million in one year, according to TennCare’s former director.14

    Behavioral “nudges” can boost voluntary individual tax compliance

    Tax systems overwhelmingly rely on voluntary compliance, for both individuals and corporations. Efforts to boost compliance through enforcement can be costly and difficult. The emerging field of behavioral economics, or nudge thinking, has the potential to increase revenues without raising taxes. A successful example of nudge thinking application comes from the Canadian province of Ontario, where the government turned to behavioral science to tackle delinquencies in employee health tax (EHT) filing by the businesses. To assist employers who were running late on filing, Ontario tested new messaging that focused on implementation intentions. In 2015, a subset of employers tweaked their collection letters, guiding participants about where they could file a return (directing them to websites and the mailing addresses of service centers) and providing detailed instructions for filing and deadlines. A month later, employers using the implementation intention approach reported a 13 percent increase in their filings vis-à-vis the control group that received the standard delinquent message.15

    Nudge toolbox: Implementation intentions

    Committing to a plan can help individuals accomplish a specific goal by spelling out “how, when, and where” they intend to carry out an action, which is known as an implementation intention. In a number of studies concerning fruit and vegetable consumption, people who expressed their dietary goals in an “if/then” format—for example, “If I am at home and I want to have dessert after dinner, then I will make myself a fruit salad”—consumed significantly more healthy foods.16

    You don’t have to look far for inspiration

    NCGEAR

    In 2013, North Carolina launched an initiative to analyze and reform state government operations. Better known as the North Carolina Government Efficiency and Reform, or NCGEAR, this initiative was a “data-based approach to improving state government processes, enhancing customer service, and realizing cost savings and cost avoidance.”

    After a comprehensive evaluation of the executive branch (which includes major state agencies), the NCGEAR published its final report in March 2015 with 22 reform recommendations. Following an eight-step process of opportunity identification, the initiative’s recommendations included a host of major changes, such as transitioning to an enterprise-wide approach for state programs and services from the current traditional agency-focused approach. The initiative is expected to result in savings worth $14 million in the first year, cumulating to $615 million by 2025 in net present value.17

    Authors

    William D. Eggers is the executive director of Deloitte’s Center for Government Insights, where he is responsible for the firm’s public sector thought leadership. He is based in Arlington.

    Christina Dorfhuber leads Public Sector Core Government Services for Deloitte Consulting LLP. She is based in Denver.

    Christopher Rose is a principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Strategy & Operations practice. He is located in Jacksonville.

    Acknowledgments

    This article benefited greatly from the contributions of Purva Singh of Deloitte Services India Pvt. Ltd.

    Endnotes
      1. “Census of state government finances,” US Census Bureau, accessed January 15, 2018. View in article

      2. Elizabeth McNichol and Samantha Waxman, “States faced revenue shortfalls in 2017 despite growing economy,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, October 4, 2017. View in article

      3. Radical efficiency: Different, better, lower cost public services, Nesta, October 2010, p. 6. View in article

      4. McNichol and Waxman, “States faced revenue shortfalls in 2017 despite growing economy.” View in article

      5. “The state pension funding gap: 2015,” Pew Charitable Trusts, April 20, 2017. View in article

      6. William D. Eggers and Peter Viechnicki, How much money can AI save government?, Deloitte University Press, April 26, 2017. View in article

      7. Eric Schnurer, “The secret to cutting government waste: Savings by a thousand cuts,” Atlantic, July 2, 2013. View in article

      8. Based on these figures, every dollar spent on the Sunset process has earned the state approximately $23 in return (see “Frequently asked questions,” Texas Sunset Advisory Commission). View in article

      9. Results Washington website, accessed January 15, 2018. View in article

      10. Theo Douglas, “Four ways Arizona Management Systems’ principles are improving state processes, saving millions,” Government Technology, May 3, 2017. View in article

      11. “CTS billing modernization project,” Washington Technology Solutions, accessed January 15, 2018. View in article

      12. Mahesh Kelkar et al., Mission analytics: Data-driven decision making in government, Deloitte University Press, September 26, 2016. View in article

      13. How states engage in evidence-based policy: A national assessment,” The Pew Charitable Trusts and the MacArthur Foundation, January 2017. View in article

      14. Peter Viechnicki et al., Shutting down fraud, waste, and abuse: Moving from rhetoric to real solutions in government benefits programs,” Deloitte University Press, May 11, 2016. View in article

      15. The case is from the report Behavioral Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World, OECD Publishing, March 2017, pg. 332. View in article

      16. Marieke A. Adriaanse, “Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet?,” Appetite 56, no. 1 (2011). View in article

      17. Report to the Joint Legislative Commission on government operations, NCGEAR, March 5, 2015. View in article

    Show moreShow less

    Topics in this article

    State Government , Digital Transformation , Analytics , Talent , Public Sector , Operations

    Deloitte Center for Government Insights

    View

    Download Subscribe

    Related

    img Trending

    Interactive 3 days ago

    William D. Eggers

    William D. Eggers

    Executive director

    Bill is the executive director of Deloitte Services LP’s Center for Government Insights where he is responsible for the firm’s public sector thought leadership. His latest book is Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies that are Transforming Government (Deloitte Insights, 2016). His eight other books include The Solution Revolution: How Government, Business, and Social Enterprises are Teaming up to Solve Society’s Biggest Problems (Harvard Business Review Press 2013). The book, which The Wall Street Journal calls “pulsating with new ideas about civic and business and philanthropic engagement,” was named to ten best books of the year lists. His other books include The Washington Post best seller If We Can Put a Man on the Moon: Getting Big Things Done in Government (Harvard Business Press, 2009), Governing by Network (Brookings, 2004), and The Public Innovator’s Playbook (Deloitte Research 2009). He coined the term Government 2.0 in a book by the same name. His commentary has appeared in dozens of major media outlets including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.

    • weggers@deloitte.com
    • +1 571 882 6585
    Christina Dorfhuber

    Christina Dorfhuber

    Public Sector Core Government Services Leader

    Christina leads Public Sector Core Government Services for Deloitte Consulting LLP. She is responsible for managing the firm’s delivery in government cost reduction, customer relationship management, revenue growth, financial and administrative systems, and leadership innovation. With more than 20 years consulting for state, local and federal governments, Christina is recognized for her deep experience in major government transformation and efficiency efforts involving significant process and system change.

    • cdorfhuber@deloitte.com
    • +1 717 651 6230
    Christopher Rose

    Christopher Rose

    Principal | Deloitte Consulting LLP

    Rose is a principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Strategy & Operations practice. He specializes in the execution of complex strategy, enterprise cost reduction, and service delivery model transformation using automation in the state government and higher education markets. He currently serves as one of the leaders of the robotics and cognitive automation offerings for Deloitte’s Public Sector practice. He has served a diverse client base that includes local, state, federal, and international public sector clients. His goal is to help the public sector and higher education institutions find the right balance between mission effectiveness and delivery efficiency. Rose holds a Bachelor of Science in business from Wake Forest University and a master’s degree in public administration from NC State University.

    • christopherrose@deloitte.com
    • +1 904 665 3843

    Share article highlights

    See something interesting? Simply select text and choose how to share it:

    Email a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
    Copy a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
    Copy your highlighted text.

    Delivering innovative, better, and lower-cost state government has been saved

    Delivering innovative, better, and lower-cost state government has been removed

    An Article Titled Delivering innovative, better, and lower-cost state government already exists in Saved items

    Invalid special characters found 
    Forgot password

    To stay logged in, change your functional cookie settings.

    OR

    Social login not available on Microsoft Edge browser at this time.

    Connect Accounts

    Connect your social accounts

    This is the first time you have logged in with a social network.

    You have previously logged in with a different account. To link your accounts, please re-authenticate.

    Log in with an existing social network:

    To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

    OR

    Log in with an existing site account:

    To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

    Forgot password

    Subscribe

    to receive more business insights, analysis, and perspectives from Deloitte Insights
    ✓ Link copied to clipboard
    • Contact Us
    • Submit RFP
    • Media enquiries
    Follow Deloitte Insights:
    Global office directory Office locations
    ZA-EN Location: South Africa-English  
    About Deloitte
    • Home
    • Newsroom
    • Code of Conduct
    • Report unethical conduct
    • Office locator
    • Global Office Directory
    • Press releases
    • Submit RFP
    • Contact us
    • Deloitte Insights Blog
    • Social Media
    • About Deloitte in Malawi
    • About Deloitte in Zimbabwe
    • About Deloitte in Mozambique
    • About Deloitte in Botswana
    • About Deloitte in Zambia
    • https://sacoronavirus.co.za
    Services
    • Audit & Assurance
    • Consulting
    • Financial Advisory
    • Risk Advisory
    • Tax & Legal
    • Deloitte Private
    Industries
    • Consumer
    • Energy & Resources
    • Financial Services
    • Life Sciences & Healthcare
    • Government and Public Services
    • Technology, Media & Telecom
    Careers
    • Job search
    • Experienced Hires
    • Executives
    • Students
    • Life at Deloitte
    • Alumni
    • About Deloitte
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy
    • Cookies
    • PAIA Manual
    • About Deloitte Africa
    • Avature Privacy
    • Standard terms for the provision of goods and services to Deloitte & Touche

    © 2023. See Terms of Use for more information.

    Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities.  Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.