AI is likely to impact careers. How can organizations help build a resilient early career workforce?

Artificial intelligence could significantly impact the workforce. How are early career workers adapting to AI’s opportunities and uncertainties?

Elizabeth Lascaze

United States

Roxana Corduneanu

United Kingdom

Brad Kreit

United States

Sue Cantrell

United States

Kyle Forrest

United States

“Bruce”1 is an early career worker in professional services who uses generative artificial intelligence for everything in his work, “even for a ping.” While he worries, at times, that his reliance on these tools may impact his critical thinking, he ultimately recognizes that they make him more effective at his work and that there may not be an alternative to learning to work with them. “I don’t think this genie can be put back in the bottle,” he said in a recent interview.2 “It’s something that either you get used to working with or you get left behind.”3

Bruce’s perspective reflects an acceptance among some early career workers Deloitte surveyed, who are racing to embrace the tools, that gen AI and other emerging technologies are likely to remake the kinds of opportunities they have access to in the coming years. These impacts on early career workers—defined as those with fewer than five years of work experience—could have significant implications for workers themselves as well as the potential success of AI-driven transformation efforts.

Realizing value from digital transformation is not only a question of technological advancement; it also relies on a workforce responsible for bringing this to life. To better understand how workers see the potential impact of AI on their own opportunities for career growth, and learning, Deloitte surveyed 1,874 workers from the United States, Canada, India, and Australia. The respondents included 65% early career workers and 35% tenured workers (see Methodology). According to our findings, early career workers today are often more excited and optimistic about AI’s potential than tenured workers—potentially given the fact that early career workers tend to be digitally native and expert users of these tools. Yet many AI technologies are being developed to automate the very tasks that these workers typically handle,4 which could lead to a decrease in entry-level job openings5 and limited opportunities for on-the-job learning6 that are important for career growth. For executives, this could impact their talent pipelines, making it difficult to source and develop future leaders equipped to navigate and maximize the potential of AI within organizations.

These dynamics underlie an essential challenge for organizations: Developing strategies to attract, engage, and cultivate early career talent is critical to realizing AI’s full potential. Failing to do so could mean betting on a transformative technology while simultaneously alienating the very workforce best positioned to unlock its value.

Early career workers are excited about AI’s potential to make work better

“I no longer have to waste time on repetitive tasks.”

“I can upskill and keep up with industry developments.”

“It helps me give my clients more individualized solutions.”

“I’m shaving at least five hours off my week at a minimum, every week.”7

These were some of the responses we received from early career workers when we asked them about their experiences using emerging technologies, including AI, in their work. On the whole, both early career and tenured workers surveyed anticipate that AI may positively impact their professional opportunities and also recognize the need to acquire new skills to adapt to the technological transformation. Prior research has found that workers over the age of 65 generally express confidence in their capacity to adapt to changes in their job roles.8 Yet our survey revealed that as a new generation of workers is entering the workforce, their relationship with technology, particularly AI, is fundamentally different from previous generations. Their use of AI is such that one person we interviewed described AI as “that first person you ask before going to a manager” for feedback and advice. This difference isn’t just about early career workers being more familiar with the tools (with 83% of early career workers versus 68% tenured workers using AI in their jobs); it could include deep-seated beliefs in the potential of AI to impact their careers.

For instance, 79% of early career workers in our survey are excited about the opportunities AI can bring to their work (compared to 66% of tenured workers), and a higher percentage of early career workers compared to tenured workers believe AI skills are important in their careers, even though they work in a nontech field (78% versus 62%). In addition, 75% of early career workers believe AI will create new job opportunities in their field (compared to 58% of tenured workers), and 77% believe AI will help them move up in their careers (compared to 56% tenured workers). These are just some of the ways AI can augment future roles and capabilities.

There are already examples of early career workers finding opportunities to use advances in AI and other automation technologies to accelerate their career development. For instance, a recent report noted that junior engineers could be spending less time on tasks such as programming and more time solving complex problems typically reserved for more tenured employees, and sales representatives could also be focusing more on data analysis than cold calling.9 This shift toward higher-value work could contribute to early career workers’ positive perception of AI’s impact on their work experiences. Compared to their tenured counterparts, a larger proportion of early career workers surveyed believe that AI is enhancing their work quality, job satisfaction, career growth opportunities, and even their interaction with colleagues and well-being (figure 1). One early career worker described the benefits this way: “I think [AI] has helped us to save a few hours that we can have to ourselves and use for our well-being.”10 For leaders, this could translate not only to increased efficiencies and productivity, but also increased job satisfaction.

Anxiety beneath the surface

Evidence suggests that the number of entry-level roles is declining,11 mainly because organizations are increasing their requirements for the number of years of work experience for junior-level roles. In sectors such as cybersecurity, for instance, where AI is already playing an increasingly bigger role,12 it is not uncommon to see entry-level analyst positions demanding at least four years of work experience.13

Early career workers are also more likely than their tenured colleagues to express concerns about AI’s impact on their learning and development opportunities, in addition to increased workload and job displacement (figure 2). One analyst notes that opportunities for on-the-job training and experiential learning have been declining since the COVID-19 pandemic pushed workers into remote settings.14 These opportunities to learn foundational skills and experiences (for example, preparing reports, analyzing simple data sets, and note-taking in meetings) may be further restricted with AI automating such tasks. In the past, new hires gained experience and confidence by gradually taking on responsibility in a supportive, task-driven environment. With AI’s ability to perform many of these foundational tasks, early career workers may find themselves advancing to more complex work without the same safety net, leading to gaps in skill development.

Junior analysts in investment banking, for example, typically learn the higher-order skill of evaluating risk in new investments through foundational tasks like gathering economic and financial trends data and updating charts in pitch decks or company valuation comparison tables with the guidance and coaching of more senior investment bankers. But as AI takes over these tasks, analysts may transform from being data gatherers to being checkers of the data that AI gathers.15 Without the domain knowledge gained through foundational tasks and the ability to learn from senior leaders in a safe environment, how will entry-level workers learn how to effectively check the AI outputs or even know what to ask the AI for?

One early career worker we interviewed worried that AI may eventually replace the very skills in which they felt the strongest and that efficiency may cost them capabilities they don’t want to lose. “I’ve always been a super strong writer. But seeing how just giving an AI tool some rough notes and asking it to clean them up … how good the tool is at that ... I could see it stopping me from writing an email out in full and just defaulting to AI.”16 This echoes the perspective of another early career worker who said they are afraid they “have become dependent on it [AI].” Research has shown that as people’s dependency on AI tools increases, it can lead to skills atrophy in areas such as critical reading and writing skills,17 and even human capabilities such as creativity and critical thinking.18

These two concerns—fear of job being impacted by automation and decreased learning opportunities—may be contributing to a third anxiety: that even as early career workers have fewer opportunities to gain skills and experience, they are expected to perform at higher levels due to advancing capabilities of AI. Among those we surveyed, both early career workers (77%) and tenured workers (67%) believe that AI sets higher expectations for what workers should achieve in their early-level roles, including performing more complex and strategic tasks.

Despite these high expectations, many of the workers we surveyed, regardless of their experience level, said that the current AI tools have limitations that make it difficult to use them effectively in their daily work. While gen AI has reduced the amount of time workers spend on certain tasks, they still have to spend time confirming whether the task is done properly or the information is correct. Quality issues were one of several concerns that both early career workers and tenured workers flagged. Others include ethical and privacy concerns, fewer chances to collaborate with others, and a perceived loss of personal touch in the workplace (figure 3).

These findings are in line with reports suggesting discrepancies between leaders’ expectations for productivity gains and what workers say they can actually do with current AI tools. According to a recent report,19 while 96% of C-suite leaders believe AI will boost productivity, 77% of employees using AI tools report increased workloads and nearly 50% are unsure how to leverage these tools to achieve the expected productivity gains.

How early career workers are adapting to AI impact

Despite challenges, early career workers are not passive in the face of AI disruption. Many are showing adaptability and are proactively seeking new ways to develop the skills, experience, and careers necessary for an AI-enhanced future. Specifically, a significant percentage mentioned they are interested in developing technical as well as nontechnical skills and upskilling with professional qualifications (figure 4).

When asked how they could adapt to the potential impact of AI on their role, early career workers also seem much more open to nontraditional work when compared with tenured workers. For instance, 32% of surveyed early career workers say they are considering starting their own business or becoming self-employed, and 30% are interested in creating a new career for themselves that does not currently exist.  While AI is already transforming the job market, we’re only beginning to grasp the potential it holds for creating entirely new roles. Early career workers already seem to be considering these new opportunities, proactively seeking ways to future-proof their skill sets.

Similarly, around 25% of early career workers say they may become full-time contractors or transition to a less tech-dependent industry or field to minimize AI’s impact. This is something that has emerged as a recent trend among the younger generations, with Generation Z workers increasingly turning to blue-collar jobs involving hands-on work that may be less susceptible to automation.20 A growing number of early career workers are also embracing an entrepreneurial mindset, looking for opportunities to become more independent, have greater job security, and create a faster path to high potential earnings.21 This outlook could be linked to generational trends. Growing up amidst the rise of the “creator economy” and social media influencers, younger generations may be more inclined toward entrepreneurial paths. Still, as younger workers shift away from work offered by white-collar and knowledge-based organizations, this trend could exacerbate an already shrinking workforce making talent acquisition and retention for these organizations increasingly difficult.22

There are also notable differences in where early career workers and tenured workers turn for help with career development questions (figure 5). While roughly 50% of both groups look toward a manager for support, early career workers are less likely than tenured workers to look to colleagues for help with career development (47% versus 54%) but more likely to consult social media than tenured workers (46% versus 33%). Both groups are also struggling to find either formal or informal mentors at work, with fewer than one in three early career workers and fewer than one in four tenured workers reporting they have received guidance from mentors.

With regard to upskilling, early career workers prioritize developing both technical and nontechnical skills, whereas tenured professionals are more focused on developing their leadership skills and their AI fluency (figure 6). This divergence likely stems from their respective comfort levels with technology. Early career workers, generally more familiar with emerging technologies, seek to complement their technical proficiency with nontechnical skills. Conversely, tenured professionals, whose roles are likely more focused on people management tasks, prioritize developing the leadership acumen and AI literacy needed to effectively integrate these tools into existing workflows and guide their teams through this technological shift.

Notably, early career workers are also more likely to say they are developing nontechnical skills that cannot be replaced by AI, including communication skills, teamwork, emotional intelligence, and ethical reasoning. These findings suggest that early career workers may be interested in approaches to skill development that include not only technical and AI skills, but also human capabilities like the ability to collaborate, practice emotional intelligence, and think creatively. These capabilities can not only provide a foundation for ongoing learning and development, but also the critical skills needed to advance and take on meaningful roles in an age in which AI continues to take on more of the functional and technical sides of work. Research suggests that early career workers just joining the workforce often lack such capabilities so it makes sense that they place a premium on developing them.23

Early career tech workers may encounter AI impacts first

Recent research has found that software engineers have been early adopters of AI tools, with one survey showing that more than 90% of software engineers use AI to help generate code.24 Our survey suggests a similar pattern among early career workers working in information technology and technical support as these early career workers are more likely to have adopted AI, use it regularly, and feel like they have a high level of expertise with the tools as compared with nontechnical early career workers.

 

As a result, early career workers in technical fields may be the first to be impacted—both positively and negatively—by the emergence of new AI tools. This may help explain why early career technical workers, when compared to nontechnical workers, are more likely to say that AI will create new job opportunities (87% versus 67%), while also experiencing higher levels of anxiety about the tools (67% versus 49%).

 

This mix of excitement and anxiety is apparent in how early career technical workers are thinking about their recent and future career choices. Eighty-two percent of early career technical workers in our survey say they are questioning whether they chose the right career path given the advances of AI, while 74% say they anticipate changing career paths in the next two to five years given the impact of AI.

 

These findings could have significant implications for organizations that are already struggling to manage an ongoing tech talent shortage25 and are likely to need a strong pipeline of early career tech workers to deliver on both technical and strategic priorities. As organizations continue to implement their AI strategies, it will be particularly important to do so with an eye toward attracting these workers.

Show more

Opportunities for building early career agility

The potential of AI and other transformational technologies cannot be realized without a workforce that sees opportunity in these AI-driven transformations. Early career workers may be a particularly important workforce segment as those surveyed are simultaneously more excited about these technologies and more concerned about the potential impact of these tools on their own career paths and opportunities. To leverage the capabilities of early career workers while addressing their anxieties, organizations may need to adopt a holistic approach: creating opportunities for early career workers to accelerate growth, prioritizing apprenticeship and mentorship opportunities, cultivating both technical skills and human capabilities, and embracing nontraditional career paths.

  • Use AI tools strategically to create space for accelerated learning and career growth

    As our study shows, early career workers are excited by the opportunities to adapt and take advantage of emerging technologies but also see these tools potentially impacting their current work and developmental opportunities. This group of workers is also highly motivated to develop into leadership roles and engage in more meaningful work: Among those we surveyed, 45% of early career workers want to advance to a leadership position as a long-term career goal and 55% want to make an impact through their work and have a fulfilling job.

    As such, organizations can benefit by using AI to replace routine tasks of early career workers while simultaneously creating pathways for those workers to accelerate their learning and take on added responsibilities more quickly. Recent research suggests that gen AI tools provide the greatest benefit for workers with less experience, in terms of increased productivity as well as improved quality of work.26

    These findings suggest that there are significant potential benefits for both workers and organizations in augmenting the work of early career workers with AI and other emerging technologies. Early career workers who adopt AI can gain opportunities to work on tougher, higher visibility problems while also identifying new ways to use AI to improve the work of the organization. For instance, law firms have been experimenting with using AI tools to enable junior lawyers to engage in more complex legal work (for example, reviewing complex contracts) that would have previously been assigned to attorneys with several years of experience.27 This can help junior lawyers to develop faster and the firm to make their own work more efficient.
  • Prioritize apprenticeship and mentorship opportunities to strengthen development across job levels

    Leaders should strike a balance between the near-term efficiency of AI tools and providing learning opportunities for early career workers. While routine tasks such as summarizing meeting notes can be outsourced to technology, early career workers may still need help developing other important skills required to advance to the next level. Organizations may also want to consider “moments that matter” to development when working with these technologies. For instance, there are still important learning opportunities involved with synthesizing and extracting insights from generated notes that may be important to consider in helping early career workers develop.

    Prioritizing on-the-job learning through apprenticeship models and investing in mentorship can help bridge this gap and encourage further development, especially considering that only a third of early career workers in our study say they have a mentor at work to help them navigate their careers. Apprenticeships can offer a more structured approach to day-to-day learning, offering early career workers the opportunity to gain practical work experience in a safe setting, while encouraging knowledge-sharing. By pairing early career workers with more experienced workers to learn new technologies together, organizations can also foster important learning experiences, often helping early career workers learn not just about the technologies, but also about other aspects of the role as they integrate the technology into their day-to-day work. For example, research found that while robotic surgery enabled senior physicians to work more efficiently, this efficiency often came at the cost of significantly reduced training opportunities for residents, resulting in longer-term skills gaps.28 But when junior and senior physicians worked together to collaborate on the use of the robotic technology, both groups benefitted and residents were able to more effectively learn the skills they need to be independent physicians. As early career workers can be more fluent in the use of AI tools, they may be well-suited to provide reverse mentoring to more tenured workers about how to effectively use AI and other emerging technologies.
  • Intentionally cultivate curiosity, imagination, and other human capabilities

    “Something I have done throughout my days is to set aside just 10 to 15 minutes a day just to sit with nothing, with no technology. To just think through some things, just to keep flexing that brain muscle,”29 says one early career worker we interviewed, who is a heavy AI user. This is one example of how workers may try to simultaneously stay on top of new advances in technology while also maintaining space to disconnect, reflect, and strengthen human capabilities such as critical thinking and imagination. This is in line with our survey findings showing early career workers are often focused on developing nontechnical skills such as communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Such capabilities may be at a premium in the age of AI,30 as advances in technology enable organizations to continue to automate functional and technical aspects of many kinds of work. By helping workers develop imagination, problem-solving, and other human capabilities, they can also learn to effectively leverage AI to craft more insightful prompts and to take a more critical lens to evaluating the quality of AI-generated work.

    Paradoxically, these capabilities may become more difficult to develop as AI advances. A recent study found that roughly three-quarters of workers say they are feeling pressured to increase production due to the rise of AI,31 which may inadvertently incentivize busy work rather than work that contributes the most value to the organization through the exercise of capabilities like problem-solving or creativity.32 In addition to taking simple steps—such as enabling workers to make space in their schedules to disconnect and reflect—organizations can focus on communicating the value of human capabilities and their connection to organizational outcomes. The Talent Development program at Walt Disney Animation Studios, for instance, trains upcoming artists with the support and mentorship of seasoned Disney Animation professionals.33 This initiative promotes creativity through ongoing exploration, innovation, and collaboration within a real-time mentor-mentee framework. By empowering early career workers to question established practices, they are placing greater focus on creativity, which benefits not only workers and their professional development, but the organization itself.

  • Support nontraditional career paths to attract the best early career talent

    To attract and retain top early career talent, C-suite leaders can consider actively supporting nonlinear career growth. Our research indicates a growing desire among early career workers for alternative work models, including gig work and starting a new business. This desire aligns with the increasing prevalence of workforce ecosystems, where organizations recognize the value of nontraditional workers. For instance, in a recent Deloitte survey of nearly 5,000 executives, 87% said they consider their workforce to include other kinds of workers, such as gig and long-term workers, as part of a larger workforce ecosystem.34 These ecosystems can be particularly beneficial to workers as well as the organization when executive leadership has bought into the idea of encouraging flexible approaches to talent development.

    One approach to facilitating nontraditional development paths is through internal skills marketplaces. For example, banking and financial services organization HSBC uses an internal talent marketplace that encourages networking and part-time project opportunities by connecting colleagues based on the skills individuals have and want to develop rather than their current job role, grade, or business area.35 These kinds of approaches can be applied to external workers and can be especially helpful in recruiting early career workers with nontraditional backgrounds who may have the skills or experience needed to do a job. For instance, Google demonstrated an innovative approach to recruiting by identifying individuals with an interest in coding and inviting them to online coding challenges on a special platform, fast-tracking promising candidates directly into their recruitment pipeline.36 By tapping into online communities and engaging with potential candidates through interactive experiences, companies can uncover high-potential individuals across different backgrounds and gain a competitive edge in attracting top talent.

As organizations continue to invest in AI-powered transformation and growth, they will need to rely on the workforce to bring their plans to life. While these transformations are likely to require both tenured and early career workers, our research suggests that early career workers could be particularly important in helping strengthen these transformation efforts. Not only are they more excited by the opportunities afforded by AI, but they also view themselves as more familiar with using these tools to get work done. Furthermore, they represent a critical pipeline of future leaders who can play a pivotal role in shaping these transformations.

For organizations, engaging these early career workers while addressing concerns about the potential impact of AI will likely include identifying workforce strategy opportunities that help workers forge new kinds of career paths and learning opportunities that strengthen their engagement and involvement in work. By prioritizing accelerated growth opportunities, empowering early career workers to hone uniquely human capabilities, and fostering robust learning and mentorship programs, organizations can appeal to this important group of workers in ways that can help them develop and stay relevant in the age of AI, while also enhancing the organization’s larger growth and transformation goals.  

Methodology

Deloitte surveyed 1,874 workers from the United States, Canada, India, and Australia from July 17 to 31, 2024, to study the impact of AI on their career pathways, growth, learning opportunities, and work experiences. The respondents included 65% early career workers (with up to and including five years of total work experience) and 35% tenured workers (with six or more years of total work experience). The respondents represented diverse industries, functions, organization sizes, and career levels, and included 28% blue collar, 32% frontline workers, and 40% knowledge workers. The survey included responses of both full-time and part-time workers. To gain a deeper understanding of workers’ experiences and interactions with AI, we also included open-ended questions in the survey and supplemented the analysis with four additional interviews of early career knowledge workers within the professional services industry.

Show more

by

Elizabeth Lascaze

United States

Roxana Corduneanu

United Kingdom

Brad Kreit

United States

Sue Cantrell

United States

Endnotes

  1. A pseudonym.

    View in Article
  2. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  3. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  4. Ryan Craig, “Chataclysm: How AI will upend entry-level jobs,” Forbes, April 21, 2023.

    View in Article
  5. Kate Morgan, “Why inexperienced workers can’t get entry-level jobs,” BBC, Sept. 20, 2021.

    View in Article
  6. Chao Li, Yuhan Zhang, Xiaoru Niu, Feier Chen, and Hongyan Zhou, “Does artificial intelligence promote or inhibit on-the-job learning? Human reactions to AI at work,” Systems 11, no. 3 (2023): p. 114. 

    View in Article
  7. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  8. Angelo Mendoza, “Future of work report 2024: AI will take jobs, make jobs, and match us to better jobs,” Indeed, April 16, 2024.

    View in Article
  9. Yiren Lu, “You’re early in your career. Here’s how AI could change the way you learn,” Dropbox blog, Oct. 27, 2023.

    View in Article
  10. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  11. Morgan, “Why inexperienced workers can’t get entry-level jobs.”

    View in Article
  12. Bob Violino, “Artificial intelligence is playing a bigger role in cybersecurity, but the bad guys may benefit the most,” CNBC, Sept. 13, 2022.

    View in Article
  13. Ryan Craig, “How ChatGPT will raise the bar for millions of entry-level jobs,” Fast Company, May 18, 2023.

    View in Article
  14. Chris Westfall, “How AI is hurting Gen Z careers,” Forbes, July 17, 2023. 

    View in Article
  15. Sydney Lake, “Junior analysts, beware: Your coveted and cushy entry-level Wall Street jobs may soon be eliminated by AI,” Fortune, April 17, 2024.

    View in Article
  16. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  17. Qirui Ju, “Experimental evidence on negative impact of generative AI on scientific learning outcomes,” SSRN, Sept. 18, 2023. 

    View in Article
  18. Robert J. Sternberg, “Do not worry that generative AI may compromise human creativity or intelligence in the future: It already has,” Journal of Intelligence 12, no. 69 (2024).

    View in Article
  19. Upwork, “Upwork study finds employee workloads rising despite increased C-suite investment in artificial intelligence,” press release, July 23, 2024. 

    View in Article
  20. Glen Marshall, “Gen Z: New-collar professionals of the “toolbelt generation,” Quality Magazine, July 18, 2024.

    View in Article
  21. Jobber, “Jobber’s blue-collar report,” accessed Nov. 25, 2024.

    View in Article
  22. Thunderbird School of Global Management,  “Why is there a global talent shortage and what can you do?” June 29, 2021.

    View in Article
  23. Inbal Shani and GitHub staff, “Survey reveals AI’s impact on the developer experience,” GitHub, February 7, 2024. 

    View in Article
  24. Nate Paynter, Manoj Mishra, Brad Kreit, Monika Mahto, and Sue Cantrell, “Navigating the tech talent shortage,” Deloitte Insights, June 11, 2024.

    View in Article
  25. Najeeb Abdulhamid et al., “Microsoft new future of work report 2023,” accessed Nov. 25, 2024.

    View in Article
  26. Irina Anghel and Bloomberg, “Some of the Big 4 consulting giants already think AI could trim years off the path to partner,” Fortune, Dec. 4, 2023.

    View in Article
  27. Matthew Beane, “How AI could keep young workers from getting the skills they need,” The Wall Street Journal, July 26 2024.

    View in Article
  28. Interview with early career worker, September 2024.

    View in Article
  29. Sue Cantrell et al., 2024 Global Human Capital Trends, Deloitte Insights, accessed Nov. 25, 2024. 

    View in Article
  30. Upwork, “Upwork study finds employee workloads rising despite increased C-suite investment in artificial intelligence.”

    View in Article
  31. Deloitte, “The quantified organization chapter 1,” accessed Nov. 25, 2024. 

    View in Article
  32. Walt Disney Animation Studios, “Interns and apprentices,” accessed Nov. 25, 2024.

    View in Article
  33. Elizabeth J. Altman, David Kiron, Robin Jones, Susan Cantrell, and Steve Hatfield, “Managing external contributors in workforce ecosystems,” MIT Sloan Management Review, March 15, 2023. 

    View in Article
  34. HSBC, “Environmental, social and governance review,” accessed Nov. 25, 2024. 

    View in Article
  35. HubSpot blog, “Google has a secret interview process … and it landed me a job,” June 24, 2024.

    View in Article

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kyle Forrest, Brenna Sniderman, Siri Anderson, Nicole Scoble-Williams, Dany Rifkin, Negina Rood, and David Levin for their help with research and analysis. They would also like to thank Laura Shact, Greg Vert, Christian Silke, Ireen Jose, Aditi Vashishtha, Yauri de Groot, and Charles Lieberman for their significant contributions and reviews of this article. The authors are also grateful to Malia Maack, Charlean Parks, Saurabh Rijhwani, and Ireen Jose for their help with marketing and deployment, and to Corrie Commisso and Prodyut Borah for their help with publishing.

Cover image by: Jim Slatton; Adobe Stock