A 2015 study by the United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration revealed that 94% of all motor vehicle accidents were caused by driver-related factors such as impaired driving, distraction, or illegal maneuvers.13 While there has yet to be sufficient data gathered to show that autonomous trucks may be less likely to be in accidents than those steered by human drivers, it could seem intuitive that eliminating live drivers may also remove many of the human causes of accidents, which could lower loss frequency.
However, autonomous driving could also create an entirely new set of risk exposures—many of which wouldn’t be covered by most of current commercial auto insurance plans.
Shifting liabilities may result in premiums changing lines
As more autonomous vehicles hit the road, new causes of loss will emerge that would have major implications for traditional commercial auto insurers. Even in vehicles with human drivers aided by assisted driving technologies, assessing causality may become quite challenging. Accidents in tech-driven vehicles could be caused by software errors, manufacturing defects, network outages, GPS flaws, failing sensors, or cyberattacks.14
Such occurrences would likely fall in the purview of product liability coverage, or even professional liability insuring those whose code or algorithms malfunction. Or would it? What if a self-driven truck hits a pothole or an icy patch and veers off the road, which would likely still be covered by traditional commercial auto policies? Incidents like this could lead to some complicated claim adjustments, and even increased litigation over who or what is responsible for an accident. As self-driving technology prompts changes in the underlying exposure, it can be hard to predict how much premium dollars might shift from payments to traditional commercial auto insurers to other types of policies. But even if only 20% of such premiums move into these other coverage lines, that would represent a loss of US$7 billion annually from commercial auto coffers.
Rising technological complexity and interconnectedness could vastly increase the cyber vulnerability of autonomous trucks and fleet operators. Industry data shows modern vehicles contain about 100 million lines of code.15 The amount of code will only increase rapidly with increasing autonomy of vehicles. As the cyberattack surface would rise exponentially with multiple targets and points of access, cyber insurance would assume a much larger proportion of insurance costs for autonomous truck owners/operators than what it is now.
One almost certain net loser, however, would be workers’ compensation insurers. Driving-related injuries account for approximately 25% of all workers’ compensation claims.16 Thus, any reduction in accident frequency due to assisted driving technology could directly benefit the profitability for this line. But even though autonomous vehicles could lessen the impact of the anticipated shortage in truck drivers (see sidebar, “The case for growth of autonomous trucks”), full-fledged autonomous vehicles, estimated to eliminate the need for 380,000 jobs, would also eliminate the need for workers’ comp coverage for those self-driven trucks. This could result in a loss of around US$3 billion in potential workers’ comp premiums.
What worked for human-driven trucks likely won’t work for driverless trucks
Insurers have decades of data on human-driven vehicles to help ascertain the type of products the market needs and determine pricing. But for autonomous trucks, insurers do not have any historical data to work with. Akin to the evolution of cyber insurance, carriers may take years to figure out what works for the market; they may sometimes burn their hands in the process.
Still, first movers will likely have an advantage. They may be well-positioned to understand the lay of the land and craft unique coverages for the emerging commercial trucking industry. One possible avenue could be to form relationships with autonomous truck manufacturers to embed multiple coverages with the sale of the vehicles. Liberty Mutual, for example, has taken a head start with multiple partnerships to assess the safety of autonomous vehicles and better understand the risks.17 AXA XL has launched a single customizable policy for autonomous vehicles, covering vehicle and component manufacturers, fleet owners, operators, and software developers.18
Exploring with new coverages and relationships early can also prove to be a good sandbox, helping carriers prepare for a larger disruption from widespread adoption of consumer autonomous vehicles down the road.