The imperative to expand and modernize grid infrastructure is largely driven by two converging forces. First, global electricity demand is projected to grow by 150% by 2050 (with a potential upside due to growing demand from datacenters, artificial intelligence, and cryptocurrency sector), straining grid infrastructure.1 Second, the rapid emergence of new sources of generation, particularly from renewables and distributed energy resources, is contributing to reshaping the electricity demand profile. These new sources change the flow of electricity on the grid and can introduce intermittency in the power flow as well, further challenging the grid planners and operators in their mandate to provide safe, secure, reliable, affordable, and increasingly sustainable energy.
These factors necessitate grid expansion and modernization. However, this is proving to be a bottleneck in achieving clean energy goals, both in terms of the availability of financing and the pace of development. A US$14.3 trillion shortfall in global grid investment is expected by 2050, with an annual global grid infrastructure (transmission and distribution lines) expansion gap of 2.08 million kilometers (figure 1).2 Meanwhile, the development timeline for grid infrastructure is three to seven times slower than that of renewable energy installations and electric vehicle charging stations.3 These financial and temporal gaps in grid development are a signal that current supply-side strategies may be inadequate for the unfolding demands of a cleaner power grid.
While challenges and disparities inherent in the energy transition and subsequent grid transformation are becoming clearer, addressing them requires a structured and strategic approach. To help unlock the potential of renewables and ensure a reliable, resilient grid, we consider a tri-phased scaling strategy. This strategy navigates progress in three distinct phases, each building upon the previous one to create a comprehensive road map for power grid transformation.
This phase focuses on strengthening and transforming the core grid infrastructure into a dynamic and responsive system capable of integrating new technologies and accommodating diverse energy sources.
Key focus areas to consider include:
US-based utility company installed sensors on two 230-kilovolt lines for under US$300,000. This strategic decision averted the need for costly reconductoring, saving the company around US$50 million in infrastructure costs. Additionally, the upgrade led to an 18% to 19% increase in line capacity and reduced annual congestion costs from over US$60 million to US$1.6 million. This implementation demonstrates how leveraging advanced technology can result in significant operational efficiencies and financial savings in the energy sector.4
This phase marks a shift toward a more intelligent and adaptable grid that embraces decentralized, interconnected, and customer-centric energy networks. This decentralized system can fortify the grid, making it more resilient and difficult to disrupt. However, this transformation requires not just the decentralization of power sources but also a reimagining of the logic and controls, extending these to the grid edge.
Key focus areas to consider include:
The future of energy lies in modernizing grids and connecting them with other critical systems. This phase transcends traditional boundaries, integrating energy efficiency and optimization across sectors like transportation, buildings, and smart city infrastructure. It’s about fostering an ecosystem where diverse elements like electric vehicles, smart streetlights, and home energy management systems speak the same language—the language of efficient energy management.
Key focus areas to consider include:
The pace of transition in grid expansion and modernization are expected to be largely determined by the movement of four enablers: capital availability, talent accessibility, technology readiness, and business models. However, the progress on these is often complicated with multiple interdependencies. For example, the finance-technology nexus is foundational, with financial support enabling technological advancements, which can lead to cost reductions and increased investment attractiveness. Similarly, the connection of the workforce-business model underscores the need for new skills and adaptability to support innovative business models that facilitate grid modernization. Addressing the interdependencies likely requires transformative solutions.
The grid’s global US$25 trillion investment, by 2050, faces hurdles such as limited traditional funding, strict regulations, and affordability concerns.19 Traditional models could falter against the project scale and innovation, alongside a utility model that historically depends on large, upfront capital investments with long-term returns. Further, securing rate case approvals is getting difficult.20 Facilitating financing could include:
The potential of renewable energy integration into the grid could be improved by unifying disparate data sources, mitigating cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and increasing standardization. Consider the following to help unlock digital potential:
The global power industry faces a 3.9 million workforce gap, exacerbated by a skills gap amid increasing competition for skilled employees from companies inside and outside the energy industry.25 At the same time, the sector faces career stagnation and rising retirements. A breakthrough could potentially be achieved through:
The business environment can be challenged by dynamic market conditions, a risk-averse culture, and a siloed organizational structure. There is also a need to reinvent the electric company model by pivoting to sustainable and empowered consumer-centric business approaches. This can be achieved through:
The path to a modernized grid would require synchronized efforts from policymakers, companies, and consumers. The essence of achieving a scalable and rapid transition in grid modernization lies in recognizing the intricate interconnectedness of these stakeholders’ actions and sequencing change accordingly. Particularly, focusing on seven key areas could yield results:
Bridging the substantial investment and development gap while integrating innovative technologies and decentralizing energy sources can help achieve sustainable energy goals and help ensure grid reliability. Although global energy transitions could necessitate similar evolutions in grid planning, individual country contexts will likely define the pressing priorities. Emphasizing collaboration among stakeholders and adopting a phased approach can help overcome obstacles and realize this vision.
Embracing innovative technologies, fostering public-private partnerships, and considering adaptive policy frameworks should be considered. By aligning stakeholder efforts and prioritizing strategic investments, the current challenges can create a path for a sustainable, net-zero energy landscape.