Manufacturers, especially those within the industrial sector, are essential drivers of the global sustainability transition. Many are tackling their carbon footprint by integrating energy management systems and smart technologies and electrifying logistics, resulting in a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. Simultaneously, they are assisting customers in decarbonization by procuring lower-carbon materials and meeting the consumer demand for technologies and products with reduced emissions.
Amid all this, industrial manufacturers are also navigating product and supply chain complexities, rising costs, and changing regulatory requirements. Their capital expenditure (capex) on both new asset formation and modifications (retrofits) to existing assets has grown by only 1.3% over the past decade.1 This growth rate aligns with the average across all industries, yet it falls short of the broader GDP growth rate (figure 1). Moreover, the capacity factor (net property, plant, and equipment [PPE]) for industrials and manufacturers has remained static at approximately 12% to 13% of total net PPE across industries.2
The manufacturing sector should consider a structured and strategic approach for navigating the challenges posed by the energy transition. A tri-phased scaling strategy, which progresses through three distinct phases with each building upon the previous one, can help create a comprehensive road map.
This phase focuses on broadening, strengthening, and transforming the foundational infrastructure.
Switching to 3D-printed tooling, Vestas achieved a three-week lead-time reduction and 72% cost savings, producing precise, lightweight components with accuracy. This method enables smaller foundries, potentially lowering costs and enhancing the casting industry’s sustainability by reducing its environmental impact.8
This phase stresses the importance of creating collaborative networks that include manufacturers, suppliers, customers, and communities to help address their scope 3 emissions. By fostering strategic partnerships, companies can build a resilient and responsive manufacturing ecosystem that can help them respond to market challenges and disruptions.
According to a recent Deloitte survey, most manufacturing respondents reported that their lines of visibility start to blur beyond tier 2 of their supply networks.11 However, partnering with local and small suppliers (beyond tier 2) can help enhance original equipment manufacturers’ (OEMs’) ability to offer localized low-carbon solutions. These small suppliers also often excel in providing specialized services like last-mile installation and maintenance, addressing specific market demands, often in a much faster time frame. Digitally empowering them and aiding in building their digital capabilities could be essential to gain visibility across the entire supply chain and maximize the benefits of their specialized support.
Additionally, in the design and engineering phase, OEMs can collaborate more closely with electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers to leverage their expertise in areas such as design, testing, building, delivery, and providing support for electronic parts in the aftermarket12 (see sidebar, “Strengthening core competencies by leveraging EMS partnerships”). For instance, a smart energy solutions company is collaborating with Jabil, an EMS in the turbine-manufacturing space, to optimize wind turbine production. This collaboration leverages Jabil’s manufacturing capabilities, exemplifying the impact of EMS partnerships on innovation and efficiency.13 EMS companies are helping advance electronics manufacturing in industries like smart lighting, solar energy, renewable energy, and electric vehicles, and the global EMS market for energy applications is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6.4% from 2023 to 2030.14
As the demand for renewable energy equipment grows, OEMs can benefit from the expertise and efficiencies offered by outsourcing their electronics manufacturing to EMS companies. This can help allow OEMs to achieve economies of scale and cost-effectiveness. By entrusting production to EMS specialists, OEMs can focus their resources and expertise toward R&D, innovation, and brand development.
Over the past five years, clean energy manufacturing investment has grown fourfold to reach approximately US$80 billion in 2022.16 Even at these investment levels, the industry has already exceeded 2030 clean energy requirements in several key areas. Global solar photovoltaic manufacturing capacity, for example, is set to hit nearly 1,000 gigawatts by 2024, surpassing the 2030 target of 650 gigawatts for a net-zero trajectory.17
Forging strategic partnerships and collaborations across various industries and interconnected ecosystems enhances production capabilities and fosters global market penetration and sustainability by integrating diverse technologies and expertise.
Additionally, collaborating with energy producers and utility companies is important for integrating renewable energy into manufacturing, optimizing energy use, and ensuring supply stability. Such collaboration helps not only minimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing but also often bolsters the grid’s resilience. For instance, in Michigan, Ford is purchasing carbon-free electricity through DTE’s MIGreenPower program, thereby avoiding as much as 600,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually.19
This tri-phased scaling strategy can help manufacturers navigate through the complex landscape. Figure 2 provides a visual road map, outlining the key actions and considerations that can help decarbonize manufacturers across their value chain.
Efforts to boost manufacturing capacity and strengthen the core supply chain are expected to be aided by four key enablers: finance, talent, technology, and business models. However, navigating these elements is complex due to intertwined challenges—for instance, while financing is crucial, it can be hampered by political uncertainties and investor hesitancy.
It is estimated that around US$26 trillion of investments in renewable technologies will be needed globally by 2050 to achieve net-zero targets.22 This can be complicated by the absence of innovative, shared risk-pricing mechanisms and macroeconomic uncertainties like the withdrawal of government incentives, weak investor confidence, or falling venture capital funding.23 Manufacturers should consider:
By 2030, the construction and manufacturing required to realize energy infrastructure projects is expected to require nearly 10 million people globally.28 To achieve this, amid challenges such as increasing competition for skilled labor from other sectors and a need for clear career progression pathways, manufacturers should consider:
Traditional business models tend to be distributed in nature, which can impede rapid response and adaptation in the face of market disruptions. To help form synergies, consider the following:
Technology is vital for rigorous product testing, ensuring standardization, and mitigating workplace hazards. These solutions are expected to be important as manufacturers aim to decarbonize their operations and assist their clients in doing so as well:
The journey toward a lower-emissions manufacturing sector likely involves a cohesive effort from policymakers, companies, and consumers. Their distinct yet intertwined roles underscore the complex interplay required for a scalable and swift transformation in manufacturing. Recognizing and aligning the actions of these stakeholders is important for helping to drive significant advancements. Particularly, focusing on five key areas could yield substantial results:
The tri-phased approach from asset to ecosystem enhances efficiency, can help foster cross-sector collaborations, and embraces innovative business models. This strategy, advanced by public-private partnerships and adaptive policy frameworks, aims to help bridge investment gaps and integrate cutting-edge technologies.