Deloitte Insights and our research centers deliver proprietary research designed to help organizations turn their aspirations into action.

DELOITTE INSIGHTS

  • Home
  • Spotlight
    • Weekly Global Economic Outlook
    • Top 10 Reading Guide
    • Future of Sports
    • Technology Management
    • Growth & Competitive Advantage
  • Topics
    • Economics
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Operations
    • Strategy
    • Technology
    • Workforce
    • Industries
  • More
    • About
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts

DELOITTE RESEARCH CENTERS

  • Cross-Industry
    • Home
    • Workforce Trends
    • Enterprise Growth & Innovation
    • Technology & Transformation
    • Environmental & Social Issues
  • Economics
    • Home
    • Consumer Spending
    • Housing
    • Business Investment
    • Globalization & International Trade
    • Fiscal & Monetary Policy
    • Sustainability, Equity & Climate
    • Labor Markets
    • Prices & Inflation
  • Consumer
    • Home
    • Automotive
    • Consumer Products
    • Food
    • Retail, Wholesale & Distribution
    • Hospitality
    • Airlines & Transportation
  • Energy & Industrials
    • Home
    • Aerospace & Defense
    • Chemicals & Specialty Materials
    • Engineering & Construction
    • Mining & Metals
    • Oil & Gas
    • Power & Utilities
    • Renewable Energy
  • Financial Services
    • Home
    • Banking & Capital Markets
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Insurance
    • Investment Management
    • Cross Financial Services
  • Government & Public Services
    • Home
    • Defense, Security & Justice
    • Government Health
    • State & Local Government
    • Whole of Government
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Human Services
    • Higher Education
  • Life Sciences & Health Care
    • Home
    • Hospitals, Health Systems & Providers​
    • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers​
    • Health Plans & Payers​
    • Medtech & Health Tech Organizations
  • Tech, Media & Telecom
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Telecommunications
    • Semiconductor
    • Sports
Deloitte.com
Deloitte Insights logo
  • SPOTLIGHT
    • Weekly Global Economic Outlook
    • Top 10 Reading Guide
    • Future of Sports
    • Technology Management
    • Growth & Competitive Advantage
  • TOPICS
    • Economics
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Operations
    • Strategy
    • Technology
    • Workforce
    • Industries
  • MORE
    • About
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts
    • Research Centers
  • Welcome!

    For personalized content and settings, go to your My Deloitte Dashboard

    Latest Insights

    Creating opportunity at the intersection of climate disruption and regulatory change

    Article
     • 
    7-min read

    Better questions about generative AI

    Article
     • 
    2-min read

    Recommendations

    Tech Trends 2025

    Article

    TMT Predictions 2025

    Article

    About Deloitte Insights

    About Deloitte Insights

    Deloitte Insights Magazine, issue 33

    Magazine

    Topics for you

    • Business Strategy & Growth
    • Leadership
    • Operations
    • Marketing & Sales
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Emerging Technologies
    • Economy

    Watch & Listen

    Dbriefs

    Stay informed on the issues impacting your business with Deloitte's live webcast series. Gain valuable insights and practical knowledge from our specialists while earning CPE credits.

    Deloitte Insights Podcasts

    Join host Tanya Ott as she interviews influential voices discussing the business trends and challenges that matter most to your business today. 

    Subscribe

    Deloitte Insights Newsletters

    Looking to stay on top of the latest news and trends? With MyDeloitte you'll never miss out on the information you need to lead. Simply link your email or social profile and select the newsletters and alerts that matter most to you.

Welcome back

To join via SSO please click on the key button below
Still not a member? Join My Deloitte

Health care: Improving outcomes, controlling costs

by Melissa Majerol, Jim Hardy, Lindsay Hough
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email
07 February 2018

Health care: Improving outcomes, controlling costs The State Policy Road Map: Solutions for the Journey Ahead

07 February 2018
  • Melissa Majerol United States
  • Jim Hardy United States
  • Lindsay Hough United States
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email

Health care is about more than medical care and is only one factor that contributes to health outcomes. Housing, transportation, nutrition, education, and working conditions play roles. State government agencies need to find solutions to get care providers and community groups working together.

What is the issue?

States have long played a significant role in the health care of their residents, but that role has increased dramatically over the last few years. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), millions of poor and low-income people have gained health insurance through Medicaid and the ACA Marketplace.1 Many states are grappling with how to ensure access to quality health care for low-income and vulnerable populations as well as those who buy their own insurance, while at the same time controlling rising premiums and underlying health care costs.

Learn more

View the full collection

Subscribe to receive Public Sector content

View the table of contents and create a custom PDF, or download the full collection

Sign up for the webcast

Alongside these changes, many states are facing an unprecedented opioid crisis, a challenge not only for the health care system, but often also for law enforcement, the child welfare system, and communities at large. Certain parts of the country have been hit particularly hard, but no state is immune to the impacts of this epidemic.2 The crisis is far-reaching, with nearly half of all Americans saying they know someone who has been addicted to prescription painkillers,3 and more than 60 percent saying that federal and state governments aren’t doing enough to fight the problem.4

Against this backdrop of new challenges, many chronic health issues persist, including obesity, diabetes, and mental health conditions. Among the most costly are individuals with multiple chronic conditions—27 percent of Americans have multiple chronic conditions, but a much larger chunk, 66 percent, of total health care spending is directed toward their care.5 There is a growing recognition that many such health issues are strongly linked to socioeconomic factors (for example, income, education, living and working conditions, and numerous other environmental factors) collectively referred to as the social determinants of health.6

These challenges are complex, and each state’s circumstances are unique. But there are numerous strategies that could help states tackle some of their most pressing health care issues.

Issue by the numbers: Health care

  • Nationwide, nearly 20 percent of individuals are enrolled in Medicaid—a 29 percent increase since 2014 when the ACA Medicaid expansion provision was implemented.7
  • In recent years, Medicaid’s share of state budgets has been on the rise:8
    • 11.7 percent in 2001
    • 13.3 percent in 2011
    • 15.8 percent in 2015
  • Following the establishment of the ACA Marketplaces in 2014, states have seen significant variability in annual premium increases. For example, between 2016 and 2017, the average premium change in the Marketplaces ranged from a 4 percent decrease in Indiana to a 145 percent increase in Arizona.9 The White House and Congress continue to consider executive actions and legislation that could impact the Marketplaces. An area of ongoing focus is the federal cost-sharing reduction subsidies (CSRs), which are paid to health insurers to offset deductible and out-of-pocket expenses for low-income individuals who qualify.
  • Research shows that social circumstances (including income, education, and living and working conditions) and environmental exposure account for 20 percent of premature deaths. Health care (10 percent), behavioral patterns (40 percent), and genetic disposition (30 percent) account for the remaining 80 percent.10
  • Opioids contributed to nearly 34,000 deaths in 2015, and opioid overdoses have quadrupled since 1999.11

How can state leadership tackle the issue?

Consider using waivers to experiment with Medicaid and Marketplace innovations

Most states have at least one Medicaid 1115 demonstration waiver. The purpose of these waivers is to allow states to waive certain federal Medicaid rules and experiment with new policies such as expanding eligibility, providing services not typically covered, and using innovative delivery systems that seek to improve care, increase efficiency, and reduce costs.12

The ACA equivalent of the 1115 waiver is the 1332 state innovation waiver, which became available to states in January 2017. This waiver aims to give states the flexibility to innovate in the health insurance market while retaining the basic protections of the law.13

Bringing a waiver from concept to implementation can be achieved in three phases:

  • Strategy. States should align their waiver initiatives with their overall Medicaid goals while also assessing the likely impact the waiver could have on other important areas such as the local economy or the social determinants of health. The strategy phase is also a good time to engage stakeholders and to ensure that the initiative is operationally feasible.
  • Design. It is important to develop a structured, planned approach to manage all aspects of waiver initiatives across technology, policy, and human capital; and come up with the best solution against existing infrastructure, policy, and agency operations.
  • Implementation: States should provide technical, operational, and policy insight to support implementation. They should also effectively engage, communicate, and train stakeholders affected by the waiver initiative and use technology solutions, where appropriate, to engage members and stakeholders.

To learn more, see Deloitte's study on how states are moving forward with Medicaid and ACA waivers.

When developing policies and proposals for a Medicaid or ACA waiver, it can be useful to see what has and hasn’t worked in other states, while recognizing that each state’s goals and circumstances might differ. And when implementing a change to Medicaid or the Marketplace through a waiver, it is important to rigorously collect data and evaluate results to ensure that good ideas can be replicated.

Explore value-based care (VBC) transformation

The predominant form of health care payment in the United States across public and private payers is fee-for-service,14 in which providers are paid for every consultation, exam, and procedure, regardless of the health outcome. Fee-for-service is often considered inefficient because it incentivizes volume over value.15 A more aspirational goal is to pay less for health care by preventing illness while at the same time improving health outcomes overall.

To learn more, see Deloitte's study on Alternative payment models in Medicaid.

In an effort to transition from a payment model-based volume to one based on value, many states have begun experimenting with a variety of Medicaid alternative payment models (APMs), including patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), Medicaid health homes, episode-of-care payments, and accountable care organizations (ACOs). Some of these models focus on the coordination of health care services by a team of health professionals to improve health outcomes and avoid unnecessary or harmful redundancies. Others incentivize care teams to improve health outcomes and reduce health care utilization by providing capitated payments to take care of a particular patient with a specific illness.

States that are exploring VBC for their Medicaid program can learn from other states that are already moving down that path. Consider these lessons:

  • Know your market. States should consider their unique populations, stakeholders, delivery systems, and political environment when developing a vision for the new program. Design a program that providers and health plans can realistically administer and oversee.
  • Keep the program design simple. New payment models can quickly become overbaked and complex. The more complicated the model, the more difficult it will be to implement. Keep it simple at first and, if necessary, introduce more complex components after initial implementation.
  • Determine how you will access, aggregate, and analyze data. A VBC program relies on accurate and meaningful data to achieve its goals. New analytic solutions or system upgrades might be needed.
  • Expect the unexpected, reflect, and refine. It is important to build time and space into the process to accommodate nuances. Incorporate successes and lessons learned into the program implementation.

Consider using a "healthy community funding hub" to address complex problems

Health care is typically about much more than just medical care. The opioid and broader substance abuse crises, for example, impact not only health care providers, but often also human services, criminal justice, and child welfare. Health care is only one factor that contributes to health outcomes. Various social determinants of health—including housing, transportation, nutrition, education, and working conditions—can also influence well-being.

To tackle these complex problems, disparate agencies, health care providers, and community groups can and should work together. But such groups aren’t necessarily used to communicating, pooling resources, and launching coordinated initiatives. Health care providers and law enforcement might be expending significant resources to address substance abuse and addiction in their communities. But without a coordinated response, they could be duplicating efforts—or worse, working at cross-purposes.

To align strategies and funding, states can work with counties and localities to establish healthy community funding hubs, a concept developed by the non-profit Trust for America's Health (TFAH). The purpose of a healthy community funding hub is to break down the walls between agencies in order to pool funds and other resources, and to develop coordinated responses that impact the community. To that end, the hub would:

  • Provide financial management and oversight to coordinate multiple funding sources
  • Govern the prioritization of spending on evidence-based interventions to ensure accountability to the target community
  • Serve as a trusted fiscal intermediary between sectors that are related to health care

Read more about how human-centered design can improve the citizen experience:

Fighting the opioid crisis
Fighting the opioid crisis
Supporting healthy communities
Supporting healthy communities

Consider updating data systems and developing advanced analytics

Because of Medicaid’s sheer size, states and the federal government are often under tremendous political and economic pressure to ensure that the program is run efficiently and effectively. Doing so through payment and delivery system reform and quality measurement typically requires advanced data capabilities.

For states, the first step toward advancing analytic and data capabilities is likely to upgrade their analytics platform. Legacy systems typically were not built to support the advanced analytics usually required to operate a modern Medicaid program. Many were built based on fee-for-service claims processing operations and didn’t explicitly take tracking processes and outcome measures into account.

As states begin to upgrade their data infrastructure, many are doing so with a broader vision of building an integrated data environment that is interoperable with electronic health records (EHRs) and other agencies and organizations, including social services, public health, and the department of corrections. The federal government has shown its support by offering Medicaid programs a 90 percent contribution to system upgrades that support interoperability, which could advance Medicaid program goals.16

While an upgraded analytics platform might be a necessary first step, it alone won’t allow Medicaid agencies to become data-driven organizations. For that, they’ll likely also need to ensure data quality and adopt self-service capabilities. In other words, agencies should first ensure that their data is accurate, then build software interfaces that can broaden the access and use of the data. Third, collecting the right data and setting clearly defined priorities—be it decreasing emergency room utilization, lowering obesity rates, or reducing the number of diabetes-related hospitalizations—could help deliver results.

To learn more, see Deloitte's study on Organizing for analytics in health care.

Lastly, states should consider establishing a strong analytics team to run the analyses, build effective models, and support the Medicaid operation to drive new payment models, reduce costs, and improve outcomes. Whether a state’s data capabilities are in-house, under contract with an outside vendor, or both, they should ensure they build a capability that can be sustained over the long term.

You don’t need to look too far for inspiration

Minnesota's 1332 state innovation waiver

Minnesota's approved 1332 waiver allows the state to use ACA funds to help establish a reinsurance program designed to reduce the cost of premiums in Minnesota’s ACA Marketplace.17 Prior to the waiver being approved, insurers in the state filed two sets of rates, one under the reinsurance program and the other without one. In the absence of the reinsurance program, health plans intended to increase premium rates by between 3 percent and 32 percent from the previous year. With reinsurance, three out of four Marketplace plans will decrease their rates; one will increase their rate by under 3 percent.18

Oregon’s coordinated care organizations

In 2012, Oregon established 16 coordinated care organizations (CCOs) to serve its Medicaid population through an ACO-like model.19 CCOs consist of networks of providers (physical and behavioral health, and dental care) who work together to serve their patients, and receive capitated payments.

Research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that CCOs were associated with a 7 percent relative reduction in service expenditures, attributable primarily to reductions in inpatient utilization, and reductions in avoidable emergency department visits. CCOs also exhibited reductions in primary care visits (a potential area of concern),20 but increases in timely prenatal care.21

Pennsylvania’s adoption of advanced data capabilities

According to federal regulation, states that contract with managed care organizations (MCOs) are required to develop and enforce provider network adequacy standards that include minimum time and distances between beneficiaries and providers.22 Pennsylvania is using advanced data analytics based on geospatial information systems (GIS) to map beneficiaries and providers to determine whether MCOs are complying with federal time and distance requirements and where the gaps need to be filled.23

Authors

Melissa Majerol is the health care research manager with Deloitte Services LP for the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. She is based in Arlington.

Jim Hardy is Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Medicaid Advisory Services lead. He is based in Seattle.

Lindsay Hough is a principal in Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Government & Public Services practice. She is based in Harrisburg.

Acknowledgments

This article benefited greatly from the contributions of Purva Singh of Deloitte Services India Pvt. Ltd.

Endnotes
    1. Julia Foutz et al., The uninsured: A primer—Key facts about health insurance and the uninsured in the wake of national health reform, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, December 14, 2017. View in article

    2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Drug overdose death data, accessed December 6, 2017. View in article

    3. “Public opinion on the use and abuse of prescription opioids,” Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation health tracking polls, conducted November 15–21, 2016. View in article

    4. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, “Most Americans say federal and state governments are not doing enough to combat prescription painkiller and heroin abuse; large majorities believe wide range of strategies would be effective,” May 3, 2016. View in article

    5. US Department of Health and Human Services, Multiple chronic conditions: A strategic framework, December 2010. View in article

    6. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Social determinants of health, accessed December 6, 2017; Advisory Committee on Training in Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry, Addressing the social determinants of health: The role of health professions education, December 2016; Josh Lee and Casey Korba, Social determinants of health: How are hospitals and health systems investing in and addressing social needs?, Deloitte, 2017. View in article

    7. Medicaid.gov, “October 2017 Medicaid and CHIP enrollment data highlights,” accessed January 3, 2018. View in article

    8. MACPAC, “Medicaid’s share of state budgets,” 2017; analysis of state expenditure reports from the National Association of State Budget Officers. This data refers to the state share of Medicaid spending as a percentage of all state funds, excluding federal funds. View in article

    9. Cynthia Cox et al., “2017 premium changes and insurer participation in the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplaces,” Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, October 24, 2016. View in article

    10. Steven A. Schroeder, “We can do better—improving the health of the American people,” New England Journal of Medicine 357 (2007): pp. 1,221–1,228. View in article

    11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Understanding the epidemic, August 30, 2017. View in article

    12. Medicaid.gov, “Section 1115 demonstrations,” accessed January 3, 2018. View in article

    13. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Section 1332: State innovation waivers,” accessed December 6, 2017. View in article

    14. HCP-LAN (2017), APM measurement: Progress of alternative payment models, accessed December 6, 2017. View in article

    15. Ibid. View in article

    16. Federal Register, “Medicaid program; Mechanized claims processing and information retrieval systems (90/10),” April 12, 2015. View in article

    17. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Letter to Gov. Mark Dayton,” September 22, 2017. View in article

    18. Louis Norris, “Minnesota health insurance marketplace: History and news of the state’s exchange,” Healthinsurance.org, December 23, 2017. View in article

    19. K. John McConnell, “Oregon’s Medicaid coordinated care organizations,” US National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, March 1, 2016. View in article

    20. K. John McConnell et al., “Oregon’s Medicaid reform and transition to global budgets were associated with reductions in expenditures,” Health Affairs 36, no. 3 (2017): pp. 451–459. View in article

    21. Ifeoma Muoto et al., “Oregon’s coordinated care organizations increased timely prenatal care initiation and decreased disparities,” Health Affairs 35, no. 9 (2016): pp. 1,625–1,632. View in article

    22. Medicaid.gov, “Managed care guidance,” accessed December 6, 2017. View in article

    23. Deloitte LLP is working with the state of Pennsylvania to implement this tool. View in article

Show moreShow less

Topics in this article

State Government , Center for Government Insights

Deloitte Center for Government Insights

View

Download Subscribe

Related

img Trending

Interactive 3 days ago

Melissa Majerol

Melissa Majerol

Melissa Majerol is a health care research manager with the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. She supports the Deloitte Government and Public Services practice with her research and comprehensive policy analysis in areas including Medicaid, health reform, emerging technology, and value-based care. She is based in Washington D.C.

  • mmajerol@deloitte.com
Jim Hardy

Jim Hardy

Specialist Leader | Life Sciences & Health Care

Jim is Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Medicaid Advisory Services lead. Previously Pennsylvania’s Medicaid director, he has more than 20 years of Medicaid, health policy, reimbursement and rate development experience. Recently, Jim assisted in developing a state Medicaid care management strategy and long-term care reform strategy; assisted states with coverage initiatives; and led a hospital payment reform initiative for quality incentives and to reduce payment for avoidable re-admissions.

  • jihardy@deloitte.com
  • +1 206 716 6346
Lindsay Hough

Lindsay Hough

Vice Chair – State, Local & Higher Education Sector Leader

Lindsay Hough, principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP, leads Deloitte’s State, Local and Higher Education practice in the United States. This team of more than 12,000 professionals works alongside government, higher education and nonprofit leaders to help them overcome challenges and seize opportunities to build stronger, healthier and more resilient communities. For more than 20 years, Lindsay has been a trusted, strategic advisor to public sector clients working to enhance their operations, modernize their technologies, innovate their processes and transform their organizations to positively impact the people they serve. Throughout her career, which began in Pennsylvania state government, Lindsay has had a special passion for client service in support of publicly-funded health care and services for adults with disabilities. Lindsay chairs the board of a human services agency in central Pennsylvania that provides employment services for adults with disabilities. She is also a member of the Gettysburg College Board of Trustees. Lindsay earned a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Music from Gettysburg College and a Master of Public Administration from American University.

  • lhough@deloitte.com
  • +1 717 695 5367

Share article highlights

See something interesting? Simply select text and choose how to share it:

Email a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
Copy a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
Copy your highlighted text.

Health care: Improving outcomes, controlling costs has been saved

Health care: Improving outcomes, controlling costs has been removed

An Article Titled Health care: Improving outcomes, controlling costs already exists in Saved items

Invalid special characters found 
Forgot password

To stay logged in, change your functional cookie settings.

OR

Social login not available on Microsoft Edge browser at this time.

Connect Accounts

Connect your social accounts

This is the first time you have logged in with a social network.

You have previously logged in with a different account. To link your accounts, please re-authenticate.

Log in with an existing social network:

To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

OR

Log in with an existing site account:

To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

Forgot password

Subscribe

to receive more business insights, analysis, and perspectives from Deloitte Insights
✓ Link copied to clipboard

Deloitte Insights and our research centers deliver proprietary research designed to help organizations turn their aspirations into action.

Deloitte Insights

  • Home
  • Topics
  • Industries
  • About Deloitte Insights

DELOITTE RESEARCH CENTERS

  • Cross-Industry
  • Economics
  • Consumer
  • Energy & Industrials
  • Financial Services
  • Government & Public Services
  • Life Sciences & Health Care
  • Tech, Media & Telecom
Deloitte logo

Learn about Deloitte’s offerings, people, and culture as a global provider of audit, assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax, and related services.

© 2025. See Terms of Use for more information.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ("DTTL"), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as "Deloitte Global") does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the "Deloitte" name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

  • About Deloitte
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Data Privacy Framework
  • Cookies
  • Cookie Settings
  • Legal Information for Job Seekers
  • Labor Condition Applications
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information