Deloitte Insights and our research centers deliver proprietary research designed to help organizations turn their aspirations into action.

DELOITTE INSIGHTS

  • Home
  • Spotlight
    • Weekly Global Economic Outlook
    • Top 10 Reading Guide
    • Future of Sports
    • Technology Management
    • Growth & Competitive Advantage
  • Topics
    • Economics
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Operations
    • Strategy
    • Technology
    • Workforce
    • Industries
  • More
    • About
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts

DELOITTE RESEARCH CENTERS

  • Cross-Industry
    • Home
    • Workforce Trends
    • Enterprise Growth & Innovation
    • Technology & Transformation
    • Environmental & Social Issues
  • Economics
    • Home
    • Consumer Spending
    • Housing
    • Business Investment
    • Globalization & International Trade
    • Fiscal & Monetary Policy
    • Sustainability, Equity & Climate
    • Labor Markets
    • Prices & Inflation
  • Consumer
    • Home
    • Automotive
    • Consumer Products
    • Food
    • Retail, Wholesale & Distribution
    • Hospitality
    • Airlines & Transportation
  • Energy & Industrials
    • Home
    • Aerospace & Defense
    • Chemicals & Specialty Materials
    • Engineering & Construction
    • Mining & Metals
    • Oil & Gas
    • Power & Utilities
    • Renewable Energy
  • Financial Services
    • Home
    • Banking & Capital Markets
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Insurance
    • Investment Management
    • Cross Financial Services
  • Government & Public Services
    • Home
    • Defense, Security & Justice
    • Government Health
    • State & Local Government
    • Whole of Government
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Human Services
    • Higher Education
  • Life Sciences & Health Care
    • Home
    • Hospitals, Health Systems & Providers​
    • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers​
    • Health Plans & Payers​
    • Medtech & Health Tech Organizations
  • Tech, Media & Telecom
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Telecommunications
    • Semiconductor
    • Sports
Deloitte.com
Deloitte Insights logo
  • SPOTLIGHT
    • Weekly Global Economic Outlook
    • Top 10 Reading Guide
    • Future of Sports
    • Technology Management
    • Growth & Competitive Advantage
  • TOPICS
    • Economics
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Operations
    • Strategy
    • Technology
    • Workforce
    • Industries
  • MORE
    • About
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts
    • Research Centers
  • Welcome!

    For personalized content and settings, go to your My Deloitte Dashboard

    Latest Insights

    Creating opportunity at the intersection of climate disruption and regulatory change

    Article
     • 
    7-min read

    Better questions about generative AI

    Article
     • 
    2-min read

    Recommendations

    Tech Trends 2025

    Article

    TMT Predictions 2025

    Article

    About Deloitte Insights

    About Deloitte Insights

    Deloitte Insights Magazine, issue 33

    Magazine

    Topics for you

    • Business Strategy & Growth
    • Leadership
    • Operations
    • Marketing & Sales
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Emerging Technologies
    • Economy

    Watch & Listen

    Dbriefs

    Stay informed on the issues impacting your business with Deloitte's live webcast series. Gain valuable insights and practical knowledge from our specialists while earning CPE credits.

    Deloitte Insights Podcasts

    Join host Tanya Ott as she interviews influential voices discussing the business trends and challenges that matter most to your business today. 

    Subscribe

    Deloitte Insights Newsletters

    Looking to stay on top of the latest news and trends? With MyDeloitte you'll never miss out on the information you need to lead. Simply link your email or social profile and select the newsletters and alerts that matter most to you.

Welcome back

To join via SSO please click on the key button below
Still not a member? Join My Deloitte

Push innovation in government

by RJ Krawiec, Alan Holden, Joshua Schoop, Shabab F. Hussain
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email
9 minute read 19 April 2019

Push innovation in government How to change emerging technology’s potential from disruptive to transformative

9 minute read 20 April 2019
  • RJ Krawiec United States
  • Alan Holden United States
  • Joshua Schoop United States
  • Shabab F. Hussain United States
  • Shabab F. Hussain United States
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email
  • A framework for effective push innovation
  • Push innovation in action
  • A potentially powerful approach

As government grapples with new technologies, how can leaders prioritize which technologies to select and deploy? One approach is to start with the solution, not the problem, using push innovation.

From robot-operated hamburger stands, to your face replacing a paper ticket as your boarding pass, emerging technologies are transforming nearly every aspect of how we live, work, and connect with each other. But they can present new threats as well. One has to look no further than the 2018 cancellation of a thousand flights at Gatwick Airport near London due to drone sightings1 to see just how quickly new technologies present new challenges.

Learn More

Read more from the Government and public services collection

Explore the Innovation in government collection

Subscribe to receive related content from Deloitte Insights

Government leaders know that these types of technologies will likely impact their mission areas, and that it’s important to stay ahead of the curve. But they don’t always have a clearly defined use case for a new technology or a pain point that the technology can solve. In cases like these, how can government leaders prioritize which emerging technologies warrant the use of their often-limited resources? And how can they then apply the selected technology—whether artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, or augmented reality (AR)—across the enterprise in a meaningful way?

Push innovation refers to the introduction and development of a new technology or product primarily due to technical and scientific advances, rather than as a response to defined challenges and user needs.

While many traditional approaches to innovation begin with the problem you are trying to solve, “push” innovation starts with a new solution or technology and then identifies the problems it can be applied to. Potential benefits of push innovation for government can include:

  • Lower risk associated with upfront cost of new technologies. Rather than investing in R&D associated with new technologies that may never pan out, a disciplined approach to push innovation can allow government organizations to capitalize on the benefits of new solutions without relying on trial and error.
  • Leapfrogging short-lived technologies. Push innovation can allow government organizations to avoid investing in more incremental solutions which—given the often difficult and long time horizon sometimes associated with government procurement—may be obsolete by the time they are implemented.
  • Reframing public sector challenges through a new lens. Push approaches rely on the use of parallel use cases and analogies from startups and industry to help government organizations identify opportunities for innovation they may never have known existed.
  • Anticipating new opportunities and threats before they become mission-critical. A disciplined approach to push innovation forces government organizations to consider how emerging technologies can impact their mission, allowing them to be proactive rather than reactive in taking advantage of the opportunities and mitigating the threats they represent.

Companies frequently develop new solutions through push-based approaches, ranging from the component-driven innovation commonly used to develop new consumer products, to technology companies’ R&D investments in capabilities such as AI.2 In these cases, user applicability and demand are often only considered after a new concept has been developed.

Government’s tendency to move slower in innovation adoption than the private sector can be beneficial when it comes to push innovation, as it can allow the public sector to leapfrog generational technology and infrastructure. Perhaps the most commonly cited example of this is how some countries in the developing world have leveraged advances in cellular technology to skip costly infrastructure investments of landline-based communications and have gone straight to a mobile communications network.3 Similarly, governments can learn from proven private sector uses for new solutions, reducing the risk and avoiding the costs associated with exploratory testing.

Ultimately, by utilizing “push” techniques to augment traditional innovation strategies, government organizations can not only keep abreast of emerging approaches and technologies but also determine where and how to apply them for maximum impact.

A framework for effective push innovation

Making push innovation successful in the public sector requires a disciplined approach involving a diverse group of stakeholders. Our review of practices for push innovation reveals seven key steps that can allow an organization to stay ahead of the curve, identify new disruptive technologies, and apply those technologies to its mission space (figure 1).

The push innovation framework goes from exploration to deployment

Sensing, scouting, and scanning

Push innovation efforts generally begin with divergent thinking—aka, casting a wide net to identify new technologies or solutions that may have previously been unknown. Sensing, scouting, and scanning efforts are digital-, research-, or network-driven activities to identify emerging technologies or trends that could be relevant to an organization’s issues.

Organizations that utilize these approaches often begin by selecting a mission priority they wish to focus on and then systematically analyzing information and trends to identify five to 15 factors likely to impact that priority. These factors should include both external forces as well as specific technologies.

The United Kingdom’s Horizon Scanning Programme recommends a framework that includes a broad analysis of societal, technological, economic, environmental, political, legal, and ethical areas.4 In the United States, the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology directorate set up an office to provide technology scouting services, to which other government programs can submit scouting and scanning inquiries.5

Use case identification

For emerging technologies identified through horizon scanning or some other process, the next step in the push innovation process typically involves identifying as many use cases for them within the organization’s potential as possible. This generally involves looking both externally, to identify where and how the technology/solution is being applied in other industries and sectors, and internally, to determine additional applications of the solution that may not be prevalent in other sectors but could still be relevant for the organization.

While finding potential public sector use cases for a given technology may appear daunting, resources do exist. For example, in October 2017, the General Services Administration’s Emerging Citizen Technology Office launched the Emerging Citizen Technology Atlas, an open-source repository of federal use cases for emerging technologies such as blockchain, AI, and AR.6

Partnering with startups

To identify use cases of emerging technologies in other industries, one of the most effective strategies involves engaging startups. Startups and entrepreneurs by their nature sit at the edges of innovation, hoping to be that next big thing. By looking to engage startups as part of their strategy, public sector innovators can quickly bring new, disruptive technologies to life inside their organization.

Startups and innovative small businesses can have at least two overarching benefits: They can offer government agencies valuable new ways of solving longstanding problems, and they can provide cost-effective alternatives to larger, more well-established companies. As budgetary constraints continue to reduce available resources, new, innovative contracting models that increase accessibility to these entrepreneurs and reduce the complexity and cost of doing business with the government are increasingly needed.

The US federal intelligence community has recognized the value of engaging startups and taken a substantial step in formalizing its relationship with them. In 1999, leaders at the Central Intelligence Agency founded In-Q-Tel, a nonprofit venture capital group that identifies, invests in, and advises startups with the potential for high impact on national security. While many of its investments are not disclosed due to their relation to national security, In-Q-Tel currently features more than 200 of its investments on its website, and a 2012 study concluded that the average dollar invested by In-Q-Tel attracts nine dollars of investment from other companies.

Scenario planning

Once the technology and potential use cases have been identified, scenario planning allows an organization to articulate the potential futures that could result from the adoption—or lack of adoption—of that technology or solution, using the identified use cases as guidance. This can play a valuable role in helping an organization prioritize which emerging technologies/capabilities should be invested in, given the opportunities and threats they present.

Although there are many approaches to scenario planning, possibly the simplest is using a matrix of technology adoption versus possible outcomes (figure 2). This approach analyzes the interplay between a major mission-focused challenge and an emerging technology to depict the possible futures that could occur.

Possible scenarios of technology adoption can be mapped along a matrix

Scenario planning is not a new practice in the public or private sectors. The National Intelligence Council regularly engages in scenario planning to produce quadrennial assessments of the forces and technologies driving changes across the globe.7 Similarly, the US Army Training and Doctrine Command’s Mad Scientist initiative continually explores the future of national and global security in relation to how disruptive technologies might impact the warfighting environment of the future.8 And Singularity University, a Silicon Valley think tank, enlists science fiction writers to articulate future scenarios of how new technologies could shape the world.9

Technology selection

Based on scenario planning, criteria for selecting which technology or technologies to focus on include, but are not limited to:

  1. Utility estimates of benefits and threats for each scenario;
  2. Rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimates for the costs and level of effort associated with adoption of the technology;
  3. Estimated likelihood of each potential future occurring;
  4. Projected timeframe for each scenario to occur; and
  5. Approval authorities and additional requirements for implementing a given solution.

Each organization should make an independent assessment of which potential technologies/approaches to incorporate into their broader innovation efforts, based on their unique organizational priorities. For example, the US Federal Highway Administration provides guidance to cities, municipalities, and other transportation departments on how to use scenario planning to make investment decisions around new transportation planning and infrastructure.10

Business case development

The selection of a given technology/approach is not the same as selecting the specific ways in which an organization can use it for innovation. While the technology selection phase of the push innovation process focuses primarily on assessing the different technology/solutions available to an organization, this phase is designed to focus on helping an organization make specific investment decisions around potential use cases for that technology.

ROM estimates for cost and effort, expected impact, and estimated time horizon for deployment should each be considered for each use case of the technology/solution.

Use case selection

Based on results of the business cases for each application of the technology/solution, a subset of these applications should be selected for development as pilots. If funding exists for multiple pilots, an organization can either select a set of projects that can be managed as a portfolio to balance risk and return, or a group of projects that can be integrated into a broader portfolio of innovation efforts in the same way.11

This approach offsets the risk and longer time horizons of more transformational projects with more immediate returns of less effective and less risky (and more rapidly implemented) efforts. Additionally, taking a portfolio-based approach allows multiple projects to draw on the same infrastructure and can justify architecture investments at the enterprise level. For example, if multiple selected use cases require a cloud-based data storage capability, the organization has both additional justification for investing in this type of infrastructure and can save costs by simultaneously running multiple pilots that utilize the same underlying architecture.

Deployment

Even good ideas often fail when they are tested or scaled ineffectively. The public sector organizations that tend to be most effective at piloting, evaluating, and scaling innovations often combine a structured, data-driven methodology with technology tools.12 Pilots should be continuously reevaluated to see if they are achieving the desired impact, with go/no-go decisions made based on the evaluation criteria used to select the use cases for piloting.

Push innovation in action

What does push innovation look like in action, and what real-life examples prove its value to public sector organizations? The US Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) exploration of blockchain and the US Department of State’s (DoS) portfolio of AI efforts are two examples that seem to demonstrate why the strategy should be a part of more organizations’ broader innovation strategies.

Case study: Blockchain at the customs and border protection

Blockchain has captured the attention of both the private and public sectors as an emerging technology with far-reaching applicability.13 As a distributed consensus ledger, blockchain creates trust across participants through a collectively agreed-upon consensus protocol. Because blockchain is so new, use cases have not been explored widely across government, which can make it an ideal technology for which to try push innovation.

The CBP is one of several agencies looking to identify and test use cases where blockchain could be leveraged, and the organization’s approach to identifying use cases represents potentially helpful examples in push innovation. To better understand the potential benefits of investing in the technology, the CBP’s Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee brought together stakeholders from across Department of Homeland Security to explore blockchain applications in trade processing.14 Participants collaborated in the development of criteria, and identified and prioritized ideas for further evaluation.

The group came up with 14 proposed use cases, including solutions related to capturing and keeping track of partnering government agencies’ licenses, permits, and bonded movement tracking.15 The CBP is now looking to engage the trade community in a conversation on where use of blockchain might or might not be appropriate.

“Really, what the government is trying to do is twofold: help blockchain along in a healthy manner for increasing market adoption and try to prepare ourselves in a proactive way to be ready for when private industry begins to really take off with this technology.”

—Vincent Annunziato, business transformation and innovation division director, US Customs and Border Protection16

Case study: AI at the Department of State

The DoS Virtual Student Foreign Service program allows US government agencies to engage US students in US federal government research projects.17 The program is currently exploring various use cases for AI, including:

  1. Creating an AI chatbot trained on a dataset of press releases and spokesperson statements to answer questions about US foreign policy;
  2. Exploring the applications of AI in international policy; and
  3. Benchmarking other nations’ use of quantum, blockchain, gene editing, and AI technologies.18

Like the CBP, the DoS initially had no clear application for AI identified but, instead of bringing experts together, the agency relied on the ingenuity of US students to propose and explore potential applications of the technology.

A potentially powerful approach

With government organizations under pressure to meet mission demands with tight budgets and strong regulatory oversight, adopting emerging technology can be challenging. But failing to adopt these technologies can put these same organizations at risk of struggling to keep up with changing citizen expectations, possibly becoming vulnerable to new threats, and potentially spending more taxpayer dollars to replace redundant or obsolete systems.

Push innovation presents an opportunity for government agencies to instead act as a fast follower of the private sector, leapfrogging the latter’s early explorations to incorporate transformational innovation into the public sector organization’s broader innovation portfolio.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank Kate Large of Deloitte Consulting LLP for all her contributions to this article.

Cover image by: Kotryna Zukauskaite

Endnotes
    1. BBC News, “Drone no-fly zone to be widened after Gatwick chaos,” February 20, 2019. View in article

    2. Eric Jang, “What companies are winning the race for artificial intelligence?,” Forbes, February 24, 2017. View in article

    3. VOA News, “Cell phones allow countries to 'leapfrog' technology,” November 1, 2009. View in article

    4. Government Office for Science, The futures toolkit: Tools for futures thinking and foresight across UK government, November 2017. View in article

    5. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, “DHS science and technology directorate: Technology scouting and horizon scanning,” accessed March 26, 2019; Jack Corrigan, “DHS restructures research office to meet emerging threats head on,” Nextgov, October 2, 2018. View in article

    6. General Services Administration, “Emerging citizen technology ,” accessed March 26, 2019. View in article

    7. Schuyler Null, “Paradox of progress: National intelligence council releases global trends report,” New Security Beat, January 11, 2017. View in article

    8. Army.mil, “Mad scientist initiative: Provided by U.S. army training and doctrine command,” July 19, 2016. View in article

    9. Jody Medich, “How to leverage the power of science fiction for exponential innovation,” Singularity Hub, May 9, 2018. View in article

    10. Federal Highway Administration, “Scenario planning,” accessed March 26, 2019. View in article

    11. Bansi Nagji and Geoff Tuff, “Managing your innovation portfolio,” Harvard Business Review, May 2012. View in article

    12. Joshua Schoop, William D. Eggers, and Alan Holden, Success at scale: A guide to scaling public sector innovation, Deloitte Insights, May 25, 2018. View in article

    13. Jason Killmeyer, Mark White, and Bruce Chew, Will blockchain transform the public sector?: Blockchain basics for government, Deloitte University Press, 2017. View in article

    14. Stan Higgins, “US Customs and Border Protection Advisors form Blockchain Research Effort,” CoinDesk, November 10, 2017. View in article

    15. Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee, “Global supply chain subcommittee: Trade executive summary,” November 14, 2017. View in article

    16. Sofiko Abeslamidze, “US officials trial blockchain for customs and border protection,” Coinspeaker, August 22, 2018. View in article

    17. U.S. Department of State, “Virtual student federal service,” accessed March 26, 2019. View in article

    18. GSA Emerging Citizen Technology, “Artificial Intelligence programs,” accessed March 26, 2019. View in article

Show moreShow less

Topics in this article

Innovation , Emerging technologies , Public Sector , Government

Government and Public Services Applied Innovation

What is it that turns a mere idea into a game-changing solution? And how can this process be made so automatic that it becomes part of an organization’s culture? At Deloitte, we have drawn on our globally renowned design, digital, and strategy capabilities to develop a suite of innovation services specifically tailored to helping public sector organizations answer these questions. Our mission—and commitment—is to change the world by helping our clients generate and implement more, better, higher-impact solutions that improve the way government serves its citizens.

Learn more
Get in touch
Contact
  • ​RJ Krawiec
  • Principal, Customer Strategy and Applied Design
  • Deloitte Consulting LLP
  • rkrawiec@deloitte.com
  • +1 571 814 7641

Download Subscribe

Related content

img Trending

Interactive 3 days ago

Explore innovation in government and public services

  • Innovation Collection
  • Government cloud: A mission accelerator for future innovation Article6 years ago
  • Developing innovation portfolios for the public sector Article6 years ago
  • Transforming the cost structure of government Article6 years ago
  • Success at scale for governments Article6 years ago
  • Catalyzing public sector innovation Article8 years ago
RJ Krawiec

RJ Krawiec

Principal | Deloitte US

RJ is a principal and the Chief Marketing Officer for Deloitte’s Government & Public Services (GPS) practice. He oversees the marketing and communications team comprised of brand, strategic marketing, events, content, and digital marketing for GPS consulting and advisory. As CMO, he is focused on driving awareness and growth in the marketplace and delivering impact for clients. RJ also serves a dual role as leader of both the GPS Advertising, Marketing and Commerce (AM&C) and GPS Customer Strategy and Applied Design (CS&AD) offerings. In his role as the inaugural GPS AM&C leader, RJ works with public sector clients to connect with the people, stakeholders, and citizens they serve by implementing best-in-class marketing strategies and turning mission values into measurable growth. As the GPS CS&AD leader, RJ supports client growth using human insights to design and deliver powerful experiences, drive measurable outcomes, and transform organizations. RJ was also a leader in the firm’s launch of Hux, a new experience management capability that enables organizations to own the customer journey end-to-end and provide more personal and relevant customer and employee experiences at scale into the public sector. RJ specializes in enabling early adopters to drive value to their organizations through design, with a focus on implementation and impact. He brings nearly 20 years of experience delivering to senior executive clients across the federal, state, local, commercial, and nonprofit sectors. RJ joined Deloitte as an intern in 2001 as part of the Data Quality and Integrity practice. Since then, he worked in the Risk and Commercial practices before joining GPS.

  • rkrawiec@deloitte.com
  • +1 860 572 9432
Alan Holden

Alan Holden

Senior manager | Deloitte Consulting LLP

Alan Holden has more than a decade of experience working at the intersection of strategy and innovation. He is currently a manager with Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Federal practice, where his work focuses on helping public sector organizations envision how emerging technologies and business models can be used to transform their operations. An experienced facilitator, public speaker, and entrepreneur, Holden holds a Master of Business Administration in innovation management from the Wharton School, a Master in Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University, and a Bachelor of Arts from Duke University.

  • aholden@deloitte.com
  • +1 571 882 5266
Joshua Schoop

Joshua Schoop

Senior Consultant | Deloitte Consulting LLP

Joshua Schoop is a senior consultant in Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Federal practice. He has over a decade of experience with innovation in the public and global development sectors. Josh holds a Ph.D. in international development from Tulane Law School and is based in Washington, DC.

  • jschoop@deloitte.com
  • +1 202 412 2454
Shabab F. Hussain

Shabab F. Hussain

Shabab F. Hussain is a consultant in Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Government & Public Services practice. He helps government and multilateral institution clients along their journey to become more innovative organizations—with a specific focus on the strategies, structures, and processes needed to catalyze innovations. He holds a BS in science, technology, and international affairs from Georgetown University.

  • shussain@deloitte.com

Share article highlights

See something interesting? Simply select text and choose how to share it:

Email a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
Copy a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
Copy your highlighted text.

Push innovation in government has been saved

Push innovation in government has been removed

An Article Titled Push innovation in government already exists in Saved items

Invalid special characters found 
Forgot password

To stay logged in, change your functional cookie settings.

OR

Social login not available on Microsoft Edge browser at this time.

Connect Accounts

Connect your social accounts

This is the first time you have logged in with a social network.

You have previously logged in with a different account. To link your accounts, please re-authenticate.

Log in with an existing social network:

To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

OR

Log in with an existing site account:

To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

Forgot password

Subscribe

to receive more business insights, analysis, and perspectives from Deloitte Insights
✓ Link copied to clipboard

Deloitte Insights and our research centers deliver proprietary research designed to help organizations turn their aspirations into action.

Deloitte Insights

  • Home
  • Topics
  • Industries
  • About Deloitte Insights

DELOITTE RESEARCH CENTERS

  • Cross-Industry
  • Economics
  • Consumer
  • Energy & Industrials
  • Financial Services
  • Government & Public Services
  • Life Sciences & Health Care
  • Tech, Media & Telecom
Deloitte logo

Learn about Deloitte’s offerings, people, and culture as a global provider of audit, assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax, and related services.

© 2025. See Terms of Use for more information.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ("DTTL"), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as "Deloitte Global") does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the "Deloitte" name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms.

  • About Deloitte
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Data Privacy Framework
  • Cookies
  • Cookie Settings
  • Legal Information for Job Seekers
  • Labor Condition Applications
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information