Article
Sustainability Reporting
Double Materiality Assessment
Published Date: 30 September 2024
Double Materiality Assessment
On 31 July 2023, the European Commission adopted a delegated regulation on the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which detail the requirements for companies within the scope of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Within this framework, from 2024 onwards, organisations are expected to not only include impact materiality perspectives (inside-out view), but also financial materiality perspectives (outside-in view) in their annual reports. This is driving many companies to revise and update their materiality assessment and underlying processes – but where do you begin, and how do you go about it?
Double materiality assessment approach involves evaluating impact materiality and financial materiality:
- Impact Materiality
A company’s actual or potential, positive or negative impact on people or the environment - Financial Materiality
How environmental and social issues create financial risks and opportunities for the company
This approach ensures organisations consider both their external impacts and the internal financial implications of ESG-related risks and opportunities. It aims to identify sustainability matters that are financially material, helping organisations prioritise and address these to drive long-term strategic value and meet regulatory requirements. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEx) currently does not mandate formal double materiality assessment, but it encourages companies to voluntarily adopt this approach.
Approach to Double Materiality Assessment
Phase 1 | Identify stakeholders who have insights into the company’s risks and opportunities, understand the business implications of ESG matters and can offer perspectives on financial matters. | |
Phase 2 | Impact Materiality Analysis (inside-out) | Financial Impact Analysis (outside-in) |
Phase 3 | Conduct stakeholder engagement through surveys and/or interviews by considering the severity, scope, irremediability and likelihood of the impact. This involves looking at the scale of the issue, how many people it affects, the extent to which the impact can be remediated and the likelihood of the impact occurring. | Conduct stakeholder engagement through surveys and/or interviews by determining the likelihood of the risk or opportunity occurring and the financial effect if it materialises. |
Phase 4 | Analyse the results of stakeholder engagement to provide a clear view of the impacts and materiality of sustainability matters as perceived by the different selected stakeholder groups. Integrate these results into reporting and the shaping of Company strategy. |
What are the current challenges facing the adoption of such assessment?
Challenge | Solution |
Engaging top management | Highlight the strategic benefits, such as risk management, opportunity identification and long-term value creation, and frame the assessment as a critical component of corporate strategy. |
Defining the right granularity level for material topics | Tailor the assessment to the specific context of the organisation and its stakeholders, ensuring relevance and practicality without losing necessary detail. |
Selecting the right stakeholders | Use a criteria-based approach to select stakeholders who are most affected by, or can affect, the organisation’s impacts and financial outcomes. |
Balancing impact and financial materiality | Develop a clear framework that systematically evaluates both dimensions and identifies overlaps or trade-offs between them. |
Integrating results into reporting and strategy | Ensure the assessment is aligned with the organisation’s goals and values, and that findings are translated into actionable insights for decision-makers. |
Maintaining a continuous materiality process | Integrate materiality assessment into regular business processes and establish a cross-functional team to oversee the continuous evaluation and updating of material issues. |