Article
3 minute read 28 November 2022

The cost of buying green: Part II

Demand for pricier green products continues to slip worldwide. But the trend might be a bullish signal for the future of green products.

Leon Pieters

Leon Pieters

Netherlands

James Cascone

James Cascone

United States

Stephen Rogers

Stephen Rogers

United States

Derek Pankratz

Derek Pankratz

United States

Anthony Waelter

Anthony Waelter

United States

Four in 10 consumers report that their financial situation has worsened over the past year.1 Concern over personal savings remains elevated, and spending intentions are weakening.

Increased financial stress has had a deleterious effect on sustainable consumption. As it became clear that inflation wasn’t transitory as many economists predicted, consumer behaviors began to shift. Between September 2021 and March 2022, fewer consumers said they had purchased at least one sustainably produced good or service within the past month. They also cited cost as the top reason why.

Six months later, the pullback around sustainable goods is only more pervasive. By September 2022, even fewer consumers made sustainable purchases, and the trend spread across more countries (figure 1). Cost remains the leading driver.

The trend confirms what’s likely a global truth for green products. Consumers still perceive a significant tradeoff with cost. And given the economic headwinds ahead, some questions are being raised about the sustainability of green premiums.

A bullish signal

Consumers associate sustainable products with many environmentally friendly perks. Most often, consumers consider products to be sustainably produced when they’re made from recycled (55%) or renewable (51%) materials, using less energy (39%), and with minimal or biodegradable packaging (31%), among other features.2 Consumers also recognize that these attributes come at a higher cost.

Despite the higher price tags, roughly four in 10 globally decided to buy green in the middle of a financially challenging year.

From that perspective, the resilience in green product demand could be a positive signal. In the face of economic uncertainties, these consumers choose to do right by the planet over what might have been suitable for their pocket. It’s also a good test of the possible floor (of which we will have a better idea in March 2023 when we survey consumers again). When the economic storm passes, buying green could be set for a significant rebound as consumers’ financial wellbeing recovers and companies continue to innovate.

What consumers buy … and what they don’t

Sustainable living goes beyond buying green products. Everything we consume connects to a carbon impact. And while financial stress is likely convincing more customers to leave sustainable goods on store shelves, it’s also likely making consumers more sustainable in other ways, even if only coincidentally.

For example, Americans who feel their financial situation worsened over the past year are significantly more likely to cite engaging in many behaviors tied to sustainable living (figure 2). They’re more likely to say they’re making efforts to reduce energy and water use in their homes, fly less, and order fewer packages to their homes.

Many consumers live in a moment of austerity—particularly those feeling the financial pinch. Over the past year, spending intentions slipped across more discretionary categories like entertainment and restaurants—as well as in less discretionary categories like clothing, household goods, and personal care.3

At least part of the recent green pullback is likely tied to much broader household spending cutbacks.

For the foreseeable future, consumers will likely perceive a cost to going green. When consumers’ sense of financial wellbeing is healthy, they are willing to pay at least a modest premium. When times are more challenging, they are more likely to pay (perhaps indirectly) by forgoing conveniences and entertainment.

Eventually, sustainability likely needs to scale to the point that sustainable products and services are the first choices based on their quality and price. Given the potential for price sensitivity, companies may have to innovate to bring the overall costs down continually.

Electric vehicles may serve as an example. Once a luxury for only the more affluent, more affordable options continue to hit the market each year. Governments around the world have put incentives in place to encourage adoption. While overall market penetration remains modest, the progress in the last decade has been notable.4

When the price of an electric vehicle matches or beats a traditional gas-powered vehicle, and the charging infrastructure is in place, consumers likely won’t be putting their pockets ahead of the planet because they won’t have to. Many forward-thinking companies are working to put other product categories on the same trajectories by innovating green technologies and installing infrastructure.

And, when they do, many consumers will be there even in tough economic times.

  1. Deloitte, “ConsumerSignals,” accessed November 15, 2022.

    View in Article
  2. Ibid.View in Article
  3. Ibid.View in Article
  4. Jack Ewing and Peter Eavis, “Electric vehicles start to enter the car-buying mainstream,” New York Times, November 13, 2022.

    View in Article

The authors would like to thank Marcello Gasdia for his significant contributions to this article.

Cover image by: Sofia Sergi

Consumer

Deloitte Consumer leaders work with global brands to create winning strategies for the near future in the Automotive; Consumer Products; Retail; and Transportation, Hospitality & Services sectors. Our mission is to use our proprietary data and judgement to help you get closer to your consumers.

Stephen Rogers

Stephen Rogers

Managing Director

Subscribe

to receive more business insights, analysis, and perspectives from Deloitte Insights