Heads Up — FASB simplifies guidance on presentation of debt issuance costs
This issue supersedes our April 7, 2015, Heads Up on the presentation of debt issuance costs. It contains updates that reflect subsequent discussions with the SEC and FASB staffs related to the accounting for costs associated with revolving-debt arrangements.
On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense.
Since the ASU’s issuance, practitioners have inquired about the appropriate balance sheet presentation of costs incurred in connection with revolving-debt arrangements. At the June 18, 2015, meeting of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), the SEC staff announced that it would not object to an entity’s deferral and presentation of such costs as an asset.
The project on debt issuance cost presentation is part of the FASB’s simplification initiative. Launched in June 2014, the initiative is intended to improve U.S. GAAP by reducing costs and complexity while maintaining or enhancing the usefulness of the related financial statement information. Simplification projects are narrow in scope, involve limited changes to U.S. GAAP, and can be completed quickly.
Under current guidance (i.e., ASC 835-30-45-3 before the ASU), an entity reports debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as deferred charges (i.e., as an asset).
|Editor’s Note: Requiring presentation of debt issuance costs as a direct reduction of the related debt liability (rather than as an asset) is consistent with the presentation of debt discounts under U.S. GAAP. In addition, it converges the guidance in U.S. GAAP with that in IFRSs, under which transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issuance of a financial liability are treated as an adjustment to the initial carrying amount of the liability. It also reflects the SEC staff’s views regarding the treatment of equity issuance costs as a reduction of the gross proceeds of an equity offering. Further, it conforms U.S. GAAP to FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, which states, “Debt issue cost is not an asset for the same reason that debt discount is not — it provides no future economic benefit. Debt issue cost in effect reduces the proceeds of borrowing and increases the effective interest rate and thus may be accounted for the same as debt discount."|
Key Provisions of the ASU
The ASU specifies that “debt issuance costs related to a note shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of that note” and that “[a]mortization of debt issuance costs also shall be reported as interest expense.” The ASU’s Basis for Conclusions observes that in practice, debt issuance costs incurred before the associated funding is received (i.e., before the issuance of the debt liability) are deferred on the balance sheet until that debt liability amount is recorded.
The amendments do not affect the current guidance on the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. For example, the costs of issuing convertible debt would not change the calculation of the intrinsic value of an embedded conversion option that represents a beneficial conversion feature under ASC 470-20-30-13. Thus, entities may still need to track debt issuance costs separately from a debt discount.
View the rest of the Heads Up.
Subscribe and Archives
Heads Up newsletters, published as warranted, analyze important accounting developments, such as new FASB and IASB pronouncements or exposure drafts. Concise examples and answers to frequently asked questions assist readers in understanding and implementing the critical guidance.