Viewing offline content

Limited functionality available

Dismiss
Deloitte Middle East
  • Services

    What's New

    • Cloud transformation: Faster together

      All the way around, straight to results.

    • Deloitte Greenhouse

      Defy status quo, build momentum, stimulate ideas., achieve ambitious goals

    • Technology Fast 50 Program

      Nominations are now open for our 2022 ranking! Apply.

    • Audit & Assurance

      • Assurance
    • Consulting

      • Strategy, Analytics and M&A
      • Customer and Marketing
      • Business Operations
      • Human Capital
      • Enterprise Technology & Performance
    • Financial Advisory

      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Forensic
      • Real Estate
      • Turnaround & Restructuring
    • Risk Advisory

      • Strategic & Reputation Risk
      • Regulatory Risk
      • Financial Risk
      • Operational Risk
      • Cyber Risk
    • Tax

      • Global Business Tax Services
      • Indirect Tax
      • Global Employer Services
    • Deloitte Private

      • Family Enterprise
    • Legal

    • Sustainability

  • Industries

    What's New

    • Connect to infrastructure that builds better lives

      It’s time to revitalize, rebuild and reimagine the future.

    • Decarbonizing aviation: Cleared for take-off

      An industry perspective

    • Technology Fast 50 Program

      Nominations are now open for our 2022 ranking! Apply.

    • Consumer

      • Automotive
      • Consumer Products
      • Retail, Wholesale & Distribution
      • Transportation, Hospitality & Services
    • Energy, Resources & Industrials

      • Industrial Products & Construction
      • Mining & Metals
      • Energy & Chemicals
      • Power, Utilities & Renewables
    • Financial Services

      • Banking & Capital Markets
      • Insurance
      • Investment Management
      • Real Estate
    • Government & Public Services

      • Civil Government
      • Defense, Security & Justice
      • Health & Social Care
      • Transport
    • Life Sciences & Health Care

      • Health Care
      • Life Sciences
    • MENA Sovereign Wealth Funds

    • Technology, Media & Telecommunications

      • Technology
      • Telecommunications, Media & Entertainment
  • Insights

    Deloitte Insights

    What's New

    • Deloitte Insights Magazine

      Explore the latest issue now

    • Deloitte Insights app

      Go straight to smart with daily updates on your mobile device

    • Weekly economic update

      See what's happening this week and the impact on your business

    • Strategy

      • Business Strategy & Growth
      • Digital Transformation
      • Governance & Board
      • Innovation
      • Marketing & Sales
      • Private Enterprise
    • Economy & Society

      • Economy
      • Environmental, Social, & Governance
      • Health Equity
      • Trust
      • Mobility
    • Organization

      • Operations
      • Finance & Tax
      • Risk & Regulation
      • Supply Chain
      • Smart Manufacturing
    • People

      • Leadership
      • Talent & Work
      • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Technology

      • Data & Analytics
      • Emerging Technologies
      • Technology Management
    • Industries

      • Consumer
      • Energy, Resources, & Industrials
      • Financial Services
      • Government & Public Services
      • Life Sciences & Health Care
      • Technology, Media, & Telecommunications
    • Spotlight

      • Deloitte Insights Magazine
      • Press Room Podcasts
      • Weekly Economic Update
      • COVID-19
      • Resilience
      • Top 10 reading guide
  • Careers

    What's New

    • Millennial Survey 2022

      Gen Zs and millennials are striving for balance and advocating for change.

    • Candidate Profile

      After applying for a job in this country, you can access/update your candidate profile at any time.

    • Job Search

    • Students

    • Experienced Hires

    • Executives

    • Life at Deloitte

    • Alumni

    • Diversity and Inclusion

  • XE-EN Location: XE-English  
  • Contact us
  • XE-EN Location: XE-English  
  • Contact us
    • Dashboard
    • Saved items
    • Content feed
    • Profile/Interests
    • Account settings

Welcome back

Still not a member? Join My Deloitte

Improved clinical efficiency and quality

by Doug Billings, Felix Matthews, MD, MBA , Leena Gupta, Debanshu Mukherjee
  • Save for later
  • Download
  • Share
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Linkedin
    • Share by email
Deloitte Insights
  • Strategy
    Strategy
    Strategy
    • Business Strategy & Growth
    • Digital Transformation
    • Governance & Board
    • Innovation
    • Marketing & Sales
    • Private Enterprise
  • Economy & Society
    Economy & Society
    Economy & Society
    • Economy
    • Environmental, Social, & Governance
    • Health Equity
    • Trust
    • Mobility
  • Organization
    Organization
    Organization
    • Operations
    • Finance & Tax
    • Risk & Regulation
    • Supply Chain
    • Smart Manufacturing
  • People
    People
    People
    • Leadership
    • Talent & Work
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
  • Technology
    Technology
    Technology
    • Data & Analytics
    • Emerging Technologies
    • Technology Management
  • Industries
    Industries
    Industries
    • Consumer
    • Energy, Resources, & Industrials
    • Financial Services
    • Government & Public Services
    • Life Sciences & Health Care
    • Tech, Media, & Telecom
  • Spotlight
    Spotlight
    Spotlight
    • Deloitte Insights Magazine
    • Press Room Podcasts
    • Weekly Economic Update
    • COVID-19
    • Resilience
    • Top 10 reading guide
    • XE-EN Location: XE-English  
    • Contact us
      • Dashboard
      • Saved items
      • Content feed
      • Profile/Interests
      • Account settings
    15 minute read 24 September 2020

    Improved clinical efficiency and quality How can medtech meet physicians' digital technology needs?

    15 minute read 24 September 2020
    • Doug Billings United States
    • Felix Matthews, MD, MBA United States
    • Leena Gupta United States
    • Debanshu Mukherjee United States
    • Debanshu Mukherjee United States
    • Save for later
    • Download
    • Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on Linkedin
      • Share by email
    • Executive summary
    • Introduction
    • Interoperability is a key enabler in future care delivery for physicians
    • Optimized workflow and intelligent augmentation: Physicians want technologies that extend their reach and make care delivery easier
    • Data security and algorithm integrity: Technology generates interest among physicians but data security concerns remain
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix

    With physicians expecting the use of digital technologies in care delivery to grow in the next five years, medtech manufacturers have an untapped opportunity to team with them in driving clinical efficiency and care quality.

    Executive summary

    For many years, medical technology innovation held the promise of transforming care delivery, for example, through minimally invasive procedures, remote diagnostics and patient monitoring, and new mechanisms of increasing patient engagement and physician interactions. But adoption of virtual health was tepid until the COVID-19 pandemic finally broke down many of the barriers. The rapid rollout of virtual health in response to the outbreak offers some useful lessons on the physician adoption of digital technologies.

    Learn more

    Explore the life sciences collection

    Learn about Deloitte’s services

    Go straight to smart. Get the Deloitte Insights app.

    In this article, we discuss findings from the Deloitte 2020 Survey of US Physicians and present their perspectives on novel digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and automation. We believe readers will find the results valuable, both now and in the postpandemic environment.

    Our research found that physicians are enthusiastic about what the medtech industry will offer but have questions about whether it will meet their biggest needs, which are:

    • Interoperability: Eighty-four percent of physicians anticipate secure and efficient sharing of patient data and 83% believe that patient-generated data will be integrated into care delivery in the next 5–10 years.
    • Optimized workflow: Sixty-one percent of physicians said their greatest need today is improving routine processes in the clinical practice.
    • Intelligent augmentation: Sixty-four percent of physicians anticipate AI will help predict and diagnose diseases as well as prevent acute events and 54% expect routine medical images will be read and interpreted by machines.
    • Data security and integrity: Physicians are open to technology adoption but have questions about safety and security. Sixty-nine percent of physicians wanted to know who is liable when a medical error occurs in connection with using technology for care and 47% wondered about vulnerability to cyberattacks.

    Medtech manufacturers have an untapped opportunity to team with physicians in driving clinical efficiency and care quality. Delivering products and services tailored to physicians’ top four needs can not only facilitate adoption but also heighten impact.

    Introduction

    Physicians are enthusiastic about the prospects associated with the medtech industry but have questions about whether it will meet their biggest need—improved efficiency in care delivery.

    The Deloitte 2020 Survey of US Physicians asked respondents to specify which market trends will have the greatest impact on care delivery in the coming years (figure 1). (For further details on the survey, see sidebar, “Methodology”). The top three trends in their views are:

    Trend 1—New payment models: In previously published research, we highlighted how new payment models have the potential to spur adoption of new medical technologies that reduce costs and/or improve outcomes.1 Sixty-four percent of physicians recognize changes in payment models as powerful drivers of care delivery transformation.

    Trend 2—Care team evolution: Forty-one percent of physicians expect advanced practitioners (nurse practitioners, physician assistants) and care managers to assume more meaningful roles as integral members of the care team. Advances in medical technologies offer them the opportunity to drive major changes in care delivery. Using telehealth visits and remote monitoring, a nurse practitioner can manage a patient’s health journey independently. Escalation to a physician is practically effortless, as patient records flow seamlessly between providers.

    Trend 3—Advances in information technology: Forty-one percent of physicians also expect the standard practice of care delivery to change in the future as a result of cloud computing, predictive analytics, AI, interoperability, and 5G/better connectivity. In fact, 50% of physicians surveyed expect a “great deal of change” or more in their specialty in the next 10 years. Even more expect to see interoperability (84%) and patient-generated data integrated with care delivery (83%) in the next 5–10 years. Meanwhile, new information technologies and intelligent augmentation can help improve daily workflow and contribute to the quality and safety of care. (See sidebar, “Artificial intelligence or intelligent augmentation?” for definition.)

    Technological development is one of the top trends that physicians expect to have a significant impact on care delivery in the coming years

    We acknowledge that these concepts are interdependent and that activities in one area can influence the others. For this article, we organized the survey findings into three sections:

    • Interoperability
    • Workflow optimization and intelligent augmentation
    • Data security and integrity

    Artificial intelligence or intelligent augmentation?

    Our relationship with technology is evolving from simple automation to replace workers, to augmenting workers with technology, to collaboration between humans and machines.2 We envision that using technology for augmentation and collaboration can free up physician capacity for valuable activities that they enjoy and excel at, such as connecting with patients, showing compassion, and asking the right questions led by intuition and experience. This could be possible because effective augmentation and collaboration strategies use AI to reimagine the nature of the physician work.3 For these reasons, we favor the term intelligent augmentation.

    Methodology

    The Deloitte Center for Health Solutions fielded its biennial survey of US physicians from January 15 to February 14, 2020. This survey of 680 physicians reflects the national distribution of physicians in terms of years in practice, gender, geography, practice type, and specialty. See Appendix for detailed information on the sample.

    Interoperability is a key enabler in future care delivery for physicians

    A majority of surveyed physicians (84%) anticipate secure and efficient sharing of patient data in the next 5–10 years, and 83% expect that patient-generated data4 will be integrated into care delivery. Many physicians (65%) also believe that mechanisms will be in place allowing consumers to own and control their personal health data (figure 2). They reported that other advances—such as AI, virtually conducted robotic surgery, or hospital-at-home—are less likely to see wide adoption in the same time frame; perhaps physicians view interoperability as an essential enabler for other innovations.

    Physicians expect sharing patient health data in a secure and streamlined manner and integrating patient-generated data with care delivery to become standard practice

    Optimized workflow and intelligent augmentation: Physicians want technologies that extend their reach and make care delivery easier

    Building on a foundation of interoperability, physicians expect advanced technologies to revolutionize health care delivery—both in terms of better processes and better outcomes. Physicians are overburdened and want relief from some of their workload. A 2020 Medscape survey of physicians found that 42% are burned out; 55% reported administrative burden as their No. 1 reason for burnout.5 In our survey, 61% of the physicians said their greatest need is improving the processes in their daily clinical practice. Seventy-three percent said that advanced technologies such as AI and robotic process automation could save significant time and resources, while 49% said they could increase job satisfaction.

    First, physicians in our survey say that many aspects of health care can be furnished away from today’s care settings with the help of advanced technologies. Sixty-eight percent of physicians across specialties expect centralized monitoring and virtual triage to become standard practice in the next 5–10 years (figure 2). Such shifts in care setting, when implemented in a way that connects with clinical workflow and takes advantage of improved analytics, have the potential to significantly reduce physicians’ nonproductive time, thus directly catering to their efficiency objective. However, we saw less consensus by specialty; PCPs were more likely to expect adoption of technologies that can support remote care:

    • Fifty-five percent of PCPs versus 44% of specialists and 42% of surgeons predict virtually conducted robotic surgery could become standard practice.
    • One in two PCPs (49%), 42% of specialists, and only 31% of surgeons expect hospital-at-home to become common.

    Second, just over half (54%) of surveyed physicians expect machines will read and interpret routine medical images despite some uncertainty in the technology relative to the others mentioned. However, 64% expect AI will help predict and diagnose disease as well as prevent acute events. At the very least, 61% believe that AI, along with augmented and virtual reality, sensors, and remote care, will help consumers modify their behaviors and take control of their personal well-being (figure 2).

    Third, when presented with specific use cases for their practice, our survey respondents were most interested in solutions related to documentation. This is consistent with physicians, regardless of specialty, looking to information technology to alleviate the pain of time-consuming, non-value-add tasks (figure 3). In fact, administrative processes are ripe for automation.6 Many physicians consider solutions related to EHR data entry to be extremely valuable--voice-to-text translation (48%), smart devices that auto-link to the patient record (48%), and technology-enabled patient intake and triage (40%).

    Physicians say technology can provide more value to everyday tasks than to support clinical decision-making

    Lastly, when it comes to clinical decision support, physicians express less enthusiasm (figure 3). This said, PCPs place a higher value on tools assisting with diagnosis and treatment options, compared to surgeons and other specialists. Possibly, PCPs are more open to these solutions due to the breadth of knowledge required for a differential diagnosis workup. The inference is that PCPs see added value in AI solutions that can help them test for less common diagnoses, assist in cross-checking for gaps in care, and flag possible omissions in the treatment plan. By contrast, proceduralists may be more hesitant to entrust the clinical decision process, which may ultimately lead up to surgical intervention, to automated systems.

    Survey results overall indicate that physicians expect medical innovation to meaningfully change their work, though this varies by use case and by specialty (figure 4). Physicians of all specialties (43%) and PCPs especially (71%) said that the advent of at-home diagnostics will have the greatest impact on their work or specialty. Physicians across specialties responded that the advent of at-home diagnostics will have the greatest impact on their work or specialty (43%). Cholesterol test kits, for example, can track triglyceride levels and allow patients to monitor outside of annual checkups. Advanced diagnostics could eliminate the need for in-person visits to a doctor’s office or lab, such as in-home rapid tests and remote examinations (e.g., EyeNetra and Butterfly iQ), or perhaps reduce the need for specialist referrals.

    Forty-three percent of physicians expect the advent of at-home diagnostics to have the greatest impact on their work or specialty.

    Surgeons reported most of the change in their specialty will come from miniaturization of medical devices (48%) and AR/VR technologies (47%). Existing examples of AR/VR technologies offer us a glimpse into the future. Assistive head-mounted devices, such as the HoloLens and Magic Leap, that help surgeons visualize the anatomy inside a patient during minimally invasive surgery, highlight the potential of AR/VR technologies in transforming surgeries.7

    For many medtech manufacturers, proceduralists and surgeons are key customers for surgical tools and implantable devices. Our survey offers interesting insights about these customers. While younger and less-tenured physicians are commonly believed to be more open to technology adoption and more interested in technology advances, survey findings suggest that surgeons of all experience levels are equally likely to show an interest in new technologies, including AI and those that support the shift in site of care, such as hospital at home. Moreover, while we did not find a correlation between years of experience and openness to several types of technological developments, younger surgeons were significantly more likely to express skepticism of virtually conducted robotic surgery than those with more experience.

    Physicians expect technologies such as at-home diagnostics and miniaturization of devices to have a large impact on their work

    Data security and algorithm integrity: Technology generates interest among physicians but data security concerns remain

    Despite the desire for technologies to improve both workflow and patient outcomes, our respondents expressed concern over cost and liability for solutions that take over part of their jobs. For example, 69% wanted to know who is liable when a medical error occurs in connection with using technology for care and 47% wondered about vulnerability to cyberattacks (figure 5). Questions about the validity and reliability of algorithms were raised by 45% of respondents. These are known concerns shared by others in the industry.8 One way to find answers to these questions would be for medtech to consider partnering with providers, regulators, and patient groups.

    Sixty-nine percent of physicians want to know who is liable when a medical error occurs in connection with using technology for care and 47% wondered about vulnerability to cyberattacks.

    Physicians have questions about liability, cost, and errors related to advanced technologies

    The survey, which was conducted just before the COVID-19 pandemic, showed that almost 90% of the time, conditions that physicians deemed to be essential to adopting virtual health technologies were absent in their practices.9 Since then, many barriers such as consumer demand, licensing and credentialing requirements, and payment have been removed, and useful lessons on physician adoption of digital technologies more broadly have come to light.

    Before COVID-19 began, physicians said that conditions essential to adopting virtual health technologies were missing almost 90% of the time in their practices.

    In fact, in a Deloitte survey of clinical leaders about resuming deferred elective procedures conducted in early May 2020, nearly all said their organizations have implemented (88%) or plan to implement (10%) virtual health practices for some or all nonprocedure visits.10 In a separate Deloitte survey of health system and health plan CFOs conducted in June 2020, health system CFOs identified virtual health technologies (93%) and cybersecurity (83%) as top strategic priorities, and achieving efficiencies through digitization (67%) as a top cost management initiative.11 As technology makers attempt to commercialize new products, they should consider the barriers that still exist and learn from the lessons of forced rapid adoption. They should also consider the factors that not only facilitate but also propel physicians to use advanced technologies that enable secure data flow, advanced analytics, and the shift in site of care. Here are a few ways medtech manufacturers can go about this:

    • Interoperability is vital: Without interoperability, none of the promised benefits of new technological solutions can be realized. New information technologies should offer compelling and easy-to-use interfaces and must integrate seamlessly with existing EHR and clinical systems in a vendor-agnostic way. Failing to do so could force customers to look for homegrown or third-party plug-ins, increasing their costs, compromising data transfer, and diminishing the value of medtech products.
    • Create value through optimized workflow: Physicians’ tolerance for poorly designed, difficult-to-use solutions that detract from patient interactions is waning. For example, fiddling around with a wearable device during the clinic visit to configure it or to download data is inefficient. While interoperability is a requirement for new digital tools, it is not sufficient on its own. Manufacturers should focus on how their products can create value for patients, providers, and payers. Human-centered design and process thinking rather than product-focused thinking can also help. Additionally, the data from improved products could in turn be used as evidence to drive the adoption of new risk-sharing payment models to help manufacturers get paid for their advanced solutions. For example, monitoring recovery velocity after a major surgery can help substantiate the value of using a more costly device or technique for the procedure.
    • Intelligent augmentation over AI: Given physician interest in automating routine tasks for themselves and their staff, and expanding their reach through other health care professionals, medtech manufacturers should focus on products that automate some aspects of the work and augment existing skills rather than replace tasks that humans enjoy and are good at. New information technologies could help provide safeguards for mid-level professionals, such as decision support, as they take over some tasks currently dominated by physicians.
    • Data security and integrity should be a top priority: Even though physicians are not directly responsible for information security and data quality as part of their work, they have many unanswered questions around cybersecurity and the integrity of the algorithms behind advanced technology solutions. Medtech manufacturers should ensure their products meet current cybersecurity requirements and offer assurances of continued ability to do so in the future. They should also transparently communicate how their algorithms work and ensure ongoing validation by academia, regulators, and independent third parties – for instance, demonstrating that consistent results can be achieved in the customer’s environment using that customer’s data and processes.

    Additionally, we see a few other areas of opportunity for specific technology innovations that can enable better care delivery:

    • Diagnostics: Physicians expect continued development and sophistication of diagnostic capabilities, with at-home diagnostics having an outsize impact on PCPs (figure 5). With the increasing use of technologies in health care, physicians expect greater use of diagnostics. For instance, our survey results suggest that the net effect of automation on physician work will be an increase in diagnostic tests: Thirty-six percent of physicians anticipate an increase, 13% expect a decrease, and 51% expect no change. Opportunities in diagnostics are further accentuated by a long-standing growth in chronic conditions, a renewed focus on infectious diseases as a result of COVID-19, and shifting priorities toward prevention. Advanced diagnostics that eliminate the need for in-person visits to a doctor’s office or lab, such as in-home rapid tests and remote examinations, are examples of innovations that should enable medtech to expand its footprint.
    • Remote monitoring: Manufacturers already have a strong presence and credibility here. Particularly, when it comes to clinical grade and implantable smart devices (such as pacemakers, smart joints, and continuous biomarker measuring devices), providers rely on manufacturers for product performance and understanding the science behind the devices. The use of remote monitoring is expected to increase due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic but also as a result of changing payment models.
    • Building the connected care ecosystem: In the longer term, we believe that medtech manufacturers have an opportunity to own the connected care continuum by building complete solutions for their customers. In Deloitte’s future of health vision, technologies such as AI, advanced diagnostics, and remote monitoring will likely shift care delivery away from traditional settings and play an important role in transforming health care. To preserve well-being and avert illness, providers may look for holistic care solutions that generate insights longitudinally for patients and populations from a variety of data sources, not just inputs from one device. For instance, a smart remote monitoring solution can create a personalized and adaptive treatment plan based on continuous measurements such as biometrics and environmental metrics and interval-based measurements such as patient-reported outcomes12 and social determinants of health.13

    Conclusion

    Physicians expect the use of digital technologies in care delivery to increase in the coming years. The medtech industry has a great opportunity to tailor their products based on their needs and accelerate their adoption.

    Medtech’s customers are an increasingly evolving complex network. Physicians use the equipment bought and paid for by a health system or hospital, implantable devices are reimbursed by payers, and patients are the end users or recipients of an implant. Physicians seek significant clinical benefits, efficiency, and ease of use from new technologies. Buyers and payers want new products that reduce procedure time, length of stay (for inpatient), resource utilization, and post-op recovery time to spur adoption and provide evidence for payment.14 As customers’ goals and needs change, we believe medtech manufacturers should consider transforming their product lines, too. While scientific innovation is paramount, medtech manufacturers should consider other factors such as interoperability, workflow efficiency, and data security—which are key concerns for their customers—when designing new products. As health care continues to shift out of acute settings, manufacturers should bear in mind the lessons learned from rapid technology adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as physician concerns about liability, as demands for connected systems are being met and built.

    Appendix

    Methodology

    Since 2011, the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions has been surveying a nationally representative sample of US physicians on their attitudes and perceptions about the current market trends impacting medicine and future state of the practice of medicine.

    The general aim of the survey is to understand physician adoption and perception of key market trends of interest to the health care, life sciences, and government sectors. In 2020, 680 US primary care and specialty physicians were asked about a range of topics: future of work, future of health, virtual health, digital transformation, and value-based care.

    The national sample is representative of the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile with respect to years in practice, gender, geography, practice type, and specialty to reflect the national distribution of US physicians.

    Data collection took place between January 15 and February 14, 2020.

    About the AMA

    The AMA is the major association for US physicians and its Masterfile is a census of all US physicians (not just AMA members). The database contains records of more than 1.4 million US physicians and is based upon graduating medical school and specialty certification records. It is used for both state and federal credentialing, as well as for licensure purposes. This database is widely regarded as the gold standard for health policy work among primary care physicians and specialists, and is the source used by the federal government and academic researchers for survey studies among physicians. We selected a random sample of physician records with complete mailing information from the AMA Masterfile, and stratified it by physician specialty, to invite participation in an online 20-minute survey.

    Respondent profile: Years in practice nd practice setting

    Respondent profile: Gender, work site, and tenure

    Acknowledgments

    Project team

    The authors would like to thank Natasha Elsner for developing the research instrument, interpreting the results, and editing the paper.

    They would also like to thank our industry executive sponsors Bill Fera, Ken Abrams, and Steve Burrill for their leadership and ongoing support of the biennial Physician survey. We also express our thanks to Bill Murray, Pedro Arboleda, Sarah Thomas, Sonal Shah, Wendy Gerhardt, Laura DeSimio, Regina DeSantis, and the many others who contributed their ideas and insights to this project.

    Cover image by: Gwen Keraval

     

    Endnotes
      1. Jay Zhu et al., New payment models in medtech: Regulatory, technology, and marketplace trends converging to create new opportunities for manufacturers, Deloitte Insights, 2020. View in article

      2. Erica Volini et al., Superteams: Putting AI in the group, Deloitte Insights, May 15, 2020. View in article

      3. Jennifer Radin et al., Rethinking the physician of the future: Embracing new technologies, empathy, and new models of care, Deloitte Insights, June 18, 2020. View in article

      4. Any report of the status of a patient’s health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. View in article

      5. Leslie Kane, “Medscape national physician burnout & suicide report 2020: The generational divide,” slide show, Medscape, January 15, 2020. View in article

      6. Bill Fera et al., Improving care and creating efficiencies: Are physicians ready to embrace digital technologies now?, Deloitte Insights, September 3, 2020. View in article

      7. Michele Cohen Marill, “Hey surgeon, is that a HoloLens on your head?,” Wired, November 11, 2019; Brainlab, “Brainlab and Magic Leap partner in digital surgery,” press release, accessed August 27, 2020. View in article

      8. Jennifer Bresnick, “Arguing the pros and cons of artificial intelligence in healthcare,” Health IT Analytics, September 17, 2018. View in article

      9. Ken Abrams et al., How the virtual health landscape is shifting in a rapidly changing world: Findings from the Deloitte 2020 Survey of US Physicians, Deloitte Insights, July 9, 2020. View in article

      10. David Betts et al., Clinical leaders’ top concerns about reopening: The key issues to navigate, Deloitte Insights, June 5, 2020. View in article

      11. Steve Burrill et al., Building resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: How health care CFOs are navigating with an eye on the future, Deloitte Insights, September 9, 2020. View in article

      12. Any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else. View in article

      13. Felix Matthews, “Remote patient monitoring could trigger a multi-channel data tsunami,” blog, Deloitte, June 18, 2020. View in article

      14. Zhu et al., New payment models in medtech. View in article

    Show moreShow less

    Topics in this article

    Life Sciences , Life Sciences & Health Care

    Deloitte's Services for the Life Sciences Industry

    Life sciences companies continue to respond to a changing global landscape and strive to pursue innovative solutions to address today's challenges. Deloitte understands the complexity of these challenges and works with clients worldwide to drive progress and bring discoveries to life. 

    Learn more
    Get in touch
    Contact
    • Doug Billings
    • Managing director, Medtech
    • Deloitte Consulting LLP
    • dbillings@deloitte.com
    • +1 617 449 5149

    Download Subscribe

    Related content

    img Trending

    Interactive 3 days ago

    More on medtech

    • The future of medtech Video2 years ago
    • Medtech leaders prioritize technology and consumers Article2 years ago
    • New payment models in medtech Article3 years ago
    • Radical interoperability Article3 years ago
    • Winning in the future of medtech Article3 years ago
    • Life Sciences Collection
    Doug Billings

    Doug Billings

    Doug leads the MedTech Innovation, Product Development and R&D practice within Deloitte. He has over 30 years of experience in Medical Device innovation, product strategy, product development, operational scale-up and merger integration. He has successfully worked in and with multinational corporations and technology startups to help them successfully conceive, create and commercialize market leading products and solutions. Doug has led several clients through global transformations and scale-up of product development capability across all functions (R&D, Digital Development, Quality, Clinical, Marketing, Regulatory, Manufacturing, Supply Chain and Procurement) resulting in faster and more sustainable realization of growth and profitability objectives. These programs have included the integration of lean, agile, design thinking, concurrent engineering, supplier co-development and other advanced product design, process design and project management methodologies. His experiences includes working across a variety of medical device markets including diabetes and metabolic disease, general surgery, interventional cardiology, interventional oncology, chronic disease management, emergency medicine and interventional neurology. Doug has a degree in Biology from Duke University and an MBA from Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan.

    • dbillings@deloitte.com
    Felix Matthews, MD, MBA

    Felix Matthews, MD, MBA

    Managing Director | Deloitte Consulting LLP

    Dr. Matthews is a Managing Director and physician leader at Deloitte Consulting LLP. Felix is the National Lead for our Academic Health / Research Leaders practice. He advises his clients on strategies to succeed in an increasingly competitive market. His clients include academic health systems, national health plans, and life sciences companies. He is experienced in corporate strategy, care model innovation, physician engagement strategies, clinical affiliation strategy, value-based payments, operating model design, and digital strategy, among others. He also advises his clients on strategy implementation and enabling capabilities. With over 20 years combined experience in medical practice and health care consulting, Felix brings to his clients a unique blend of clinical understanding and business insight. Felix trained in trauma surgery and accident medicine and has led research focused on clinical technology innovation at major academic centers in the US and abroad. Felix is also a published author in peer-reviewed medical journals and a columnist on virtual health.

    • fmatthews@deloitte.com
    • +1 617 437 2097
    Leena Gupta

    Leena Gupta

    Manager

    Leena Gupta is a manager with the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. Her research focuses on emerging trends and issues in the life sciences industry, with an emphasis on medical devices and technologies as well as emerging therapies in pharma. Gupta holds a bachelor of science degree in biological sciences from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a master’s degree in public health in Epidemiology from the Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine.

    • legupta@deloitte.com
    Debanshu Mukherjee

    Debanshu Mukherjee

    Debanshu Mukherjee is a senior analyst with Deloitte Services India Pvt Ltd, affiliated with the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. He has been with the firm for more than four years, and his research focuses on topics which have current and future relevance to clients in the life sciences and health care industries. Mukherjee holds a master’s degree in biotechnology and enterprise from the University of Manchester and a master’s degree in business administration from ICFAI Business School, Hyderabad.

    • debamukherjee@deloitte.com

    Share article highlights

    See something interesting? Simply select text and choose how to share it:

    Email a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
    Copy a customized link that shows your highlighted text.
    Copy your highlighted text.

    Improved clinical efficiency and quality has been saved

    Improved clinical efficiency and quality has been removed

    An Article Titled Improved clinical efficiency and quality already exists in Saved items

     
    Forgot password

    To stay logged in, change your functional cookie settings.

    OR

    Social login not available on Microsoft Edge browser at this time.

    Connect Accounts

    Connect your social accounts

    This is the first time you have logged in with a social network.

    You have previously logged in with a different account. To link your accounts, please re-authenticate.

    Log in with an existing social network:

    To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

    OR

    Log in with an existing site account:

    To connect with your existing account, please enter your password:

    Forgot password

    Subscribe

    to receive more business insights, analysis, and perspectives from Deloitte Insights
    ✓ Link copied to clipboard
    • Contact us
    • Search Jobs
    • Submit RFP
    Follow Deloitte Insights:
    Global office directory Office locations
    XE-EN Location: XE-English  
    About Deloitte
    • Deloitte events
    • Our blog collections
    • Press releases
    • Press contacts
    • Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability
    • Report an ethics complaint
    Services
    • Audit & Assurance
    • Consulting
    • Financial Advisory
    • Risk Advisory
    • Tax
    • Deloitte Private
    • Legal
    • Sustainability
    Industries
    • Consumer
    • Energy, Resources & Industrials
    • Financial Services
    • Government & Public Services
    • Life Sciences & Health Care
    • MENA Sovereign Wealth Funds
    • Technology, Media & Telecommunications
    Careers
    • Job Search
    • Students
    • Experienced Hires
    • Executives
    • Life at Deloitte
    • Alumni
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • About Deloitte
    • About Deloitte in the Middle East
    • Privacy
    • Terms of use
    • Cookies
    • Avature Privacy

    © 2023. See Terms of Use for more information.

    Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see About Deloitte to learn more about our global network of member firms.