Pricing

Perspectives

Seize new pricing opportunities

GtN spend optimization cushions pricing volatility

Pricing volatility continues to be a key focus for commercial teams, with many organizations successfully executing list-price increases. But these are expected to be more challenging as customer price sensitivity increases. Evaluating gross-to-net (GtN) spend optimization can provide another lever for often overlooked pricing opportunities.

Create a GtN strategy business plan

During uncertain economic times, trying to change existing allowances or agreement conditions is often viewed as a risk by both sellers and retailers. In many cases, these agreements and conditions, designed and implemented at a specific point in time, eventually become obsolete due to shifting market dynamics or proliferate into a “stack” of duplicate conditions—products of M&A “inheritance.” This results in a stagnated dynamic in which a larger proportion of commercial spend becomes a default cost of doing business, not a performance-driven investment.

We find that typically up to half of an organization’s commercial spend—the various investment vehicles between gross and net price, including discounts, promotions, rebates, etc.—has improvement opportunities that can result in top-line growth, incremental return on investment (ROI), or operational efficiencies. Revisiting these investments can boost revenue and improve margin, eliminating (or complementing) the need for list-price changes. At the same time, redesign of commercial investment vehicles can better align outcomes with strategic objectives:

  • Simplicity and clarity on joint goals and outcomes with customers.
  • Reduced complexity of partner programs.
  • Shifted investment from “fixed” dollars to “variable” investments based on partnership and performance.
  • Shifted sales mix toward premiumization and higher margin, more strategic products and categories.
Make the most of overlooked net pricing opportunities

These value levers can drive measurable financial impact, typically at least 1% to 2% in incremental revenue and 5% to 10% in addressable-spend ROI improvement.

Seven principles of gross-to-net spend optimization

We have identified a common set of design principles on which to evaluate and redesign GtN investments:

  • Expand all
  • Collapse All

As with any strategic decision-making process, you should start with understanding the data supply chain and the level of insight and understanding that can be gained before beginning the GtN transformation journey. Develop and align on a clear understanding of the major data sources, spend allocation logistics, assumptions, and the must-have versus nice-to-have data fields in order to identify data-related roadblocks early on. However, don’t let perfection get in the way of an agile approach to creating momentum. Developing “imperfect” prototypes of analysis helps surface priorities and needs.

Use granular analysis, versus averages, to understand all GtN investment contributions and identify opportunities. However, rather than negotiating each investment individually, agreements should be optimized, negotiated, and tracked on a total customer investment basis. Investment levels should be allowed to shift across buckets to create win-win opportunities based on buyer and seller priorities and investment performance levels, as opposed to managing each P&L line item in isolation.

Ensure the total spend distribution is balanced between fixed allowances and growth-related conditions. This mix is typically driven by customer account goals and market dynamics, with a goal to incent growth or profitability-enhancing customer behaviors without providing unearned payments.

Regularly consider whether you are investing in the right customers and whether your investments are driving desired results. Review inherited agreements from M&A activity or other outdated programs to ensure they are accounted for in the broader category strategy and avoid leakage from discount “stacking” or customer cherry-picking.

Ensure the eligibility logic of your gross-to-net spend investments is in line with your commercial planning process and strategy. Some accounts benefit from aligning all incentives at a certain brand level, while some businesses prefer managing programs at the category or business-unit level.

Maintain similar term structures (e.g., program mechanics such as growth tiers and rate structures) and policies (e.g., same calculation of “growth” for all customers and programs) across the business for easy aggregation and performance measurement. Your architecture should be flexible enough to optimize ROI but simple and clear enough to drive the actual customer behavior you are seeking and avoid costly back-end management and leakage.

As they set commercial investment strategies, companies tend to prioritize their top accounts. However, when considered in aggregate, smaller accounts can offer a substantial opportunity to standardize deals and improve investment ROI—and changes may be easier to execute. Instead of managing single agreements with each account, we have the following recommendations:

  • Design a logical growth journey: Ensure your volume qualifiers, growth tiers, and payouts are set to avoid incentive “stalling” between one program tier and the next.
  • Communicate transparently: Ensure that customers understand the eligibility logic and tier progression and that program eligibility truly adheres to the logic in order to avoid spend leakage and promote strong account relationships.
  • Revisit programs annually: Perform ongoing analytics on customer performance, and revisit goals every year or planning cycle.

Driving execution through sell-in

A solid sell-in story is pivotal to materializing identified opportunities. Typically, these changes should be presented to customers not in isolation but in consideration of other levers that influence the account strategy, such as organization-wide list-price changes, assortment and line planning, and other commercial terms in place. We have seen organizations succeed when revenue growth management (RGM) and customer account teams work collaboratively to develop cohesive, customer-specific sell-in stories supported by a data-backed case for change and easy-to-communicate models that outline financial impact across multiple scenarios. As we continue to see “here to stay” market pressures, organizations will be expected to advance their commercial capabilities to reallocate and optimize spend to boost revenue and relieve margin pressure.

Learn more about gross-to-net spend optimization. Contact:

Brian Bodendein
Managing Director
Consumer Revenue Growth Management
Deloitte Consulting LLP

Ben Hess
Senior Manager
Pricing and Revenue Management
Deloitte Consulting LLP

Alan Levy
Manager
Consumer Commercial Strategy
Deloitte Consulting LLP

Georg Muller
Managing Director
Pricing, Product, and Commercial Spend
Deloitte Consulting LLP

Did you find this useful?