finance-transformation-strategy-controllership-function-banner

Perspectives

The importance of a finance transformation strategy

How controllership can execute a successful transformation journey

When embarking on a business-driven, technology-enabled transformation, the first key to success is establishing an effective and well-thought-out transformation strategy. Here are some critical elements that form an effective strategy and can help solve some common challenges, and controllership’s crucial role in shaping a successful transformation journey.

September 26, 2023

A blog post by Beth KaplanKatie Glynn, Eric Johnson, Shipra Khurana, and Brad Schulte

In our previous blog post, “Taking the reins,” we reflected on the importance of controllership having hands-on ownership in the transformation journey in order to achieve successful outcomes. When embarking on a business-driven, technology-enabled transformation such as an ERP implementation, the first key to success is establishing a transformation strategy. The question is, given the importance of a transformation strategy, what does a good strategy look like? And where should the controllers even begin?

Let’s review the critical elements that form an effective strategy, including some common challenges, and controllership’s crucial role in shaping a successful transformation journey.

Defining transformation strategy from controllers’ perspective

A winning strategy begins with a vision for a future of the controllership function, often focused on elevating the function’s value through real-time data and analytic insights while leveraging automation to become more efficient and agile. The strategy should be business-focused and technology-enabled, not the other way around. It should provide a North Star, clearly articulating the outcomes of the transformation and describing how the function will partner with the broader organization, including:

  • Developing new or strengthening existing capabilities of the organization.
  • Enabling more efficient service delivery by leading processes and applying automation.
  • Increasing enterprise value by shifting from transaction processing to business partnership.

The transformation strategy should be sufficiently detailed to guide decisions on priorities, investments, and resources, and include critical components such as:

  • Vision: How will the controllership function deliver value to stakeholders?
  • Process: What work needs to get done in the future, and how will that work get done?
  • Data: How can we shift accounting and financial data from a barrier to an organizational asset?
  • Talent: What does controllership work look like in the future, and what skills are required?
  • Resources: How will the transformation be staffed and governed, including third parties?
  • Technology: What platforms enable the vision, and what is the right architecture?
  • Road map: How are implementation milestones sequenced while considering accounting cycles and business reporting deadlines?

Controllership’s crucial role in leading a transformation strategy

Controllership, as the steward of financial accounting and reporting, is uniquely positioned to lead in defining a finance transformation and ERP strategy, and to identify opportunities, mitigate risks, maintain controls, and ensure financial reporting obligations are met during and after the transformation.

Let’s consider a recent real-world example highlighting the importance of defining a transformation strategy and North Star vision. A large multinational organization recently promoted a new chief accounting officer (CAO) who inherited an aging, fragmented technology landscape built on multiple disconnected data models due to a series of acquisitions. The chief accounting officer (CAO) felt an obligation to achieve globally integrated processes, built on a common data model and enabled by a modern technology platform.

The first step was to define a transformation vision for the accounting organization and engage IT leadership on evaluating the technology solutions to power this transformation. While working through the strategy, the team quickly realized it would not only impact the recording and reporting of accounting transactions, but there were many downstream stakeholders such as tax, treasury, and business finance that rely on transactional accounting in their business processes. In addition, the FP&A team desired more granular and robust accounting data to enable predictive forecasting artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models.

It became apparent to controllership leaders that to achieve their vision and justify the investment required, a broader value case was required. The program vision was broadened into an overall Finance Transformation (FT) journey engaging the full office of the chief financial officer (CFO) with the controllership function and CAO as the program champion.

This organization is not alone. In fact, we have observed successful Finance Transformation programs require strong leadership from controllership due to the function’s unique positioning:

  • Deep current-state expertise on business processes, data, and systems
  • Broad organizational relationships and trust
  • Ownership of the accounting, statutory, and regulatory compliance requirements

As such, the controllership function is well positioned to lead the broader organization in crafting a comprehensive FT vision and strategy.

The importance of talent in executing a finance transformation strategy

Talent is one of the most critical components of FT strategy—both in terms of resourcing the transformation and the broader talent strategy for controllership. Success typically requires pulling top talent from their day job to lead transformation full-time. These leaders should be visionary, tech-savvy, and have the credibility to act as evangelists to the broader organization. It’s critical to build a governance model and steering committees into the FT program to support the transformation team.

Some additional key talent considerations in the controllership transformation strategy include: 

  • Organizational design: What delivery model and organizational structure best supports the North Star vision? Can improved technology enable centralization (e.g., statutory reporting, AP/AR centers of excellence)?
  • Emerging skills: What skills are needed to be developed or added, in particular with how to shift from transactional accounting to analytics, data, automation, and business insights?
  • Change management: How do we best engage, communicate, train, and build support for the transformation within the global controllership function?
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI): How can the transformation be a catalyst to accelerate progress on controllership’s DEI goals?

Common challenges and how controllership can navigate challenges for a successful execution

The controllership function often has the closest understanding of the complex accounting, statutory reporting, and tax considerations compliance requirements as well as emerging requirements (e.g., ESG reporting). There are also critical audit and control requirements, for example reconciliation and interface controls, that should be built into the transformation plan from Day 1. Involving controllership early in the strategy development can improve change management and potentially reduce resistance later on.

Complicating the technology to fit the current process, rather than adopting standard industry practices, is a frequent challenge. For most transactional accounting requirements, the standard ERP process is sufficient. Customization results in a system that is difficult to maintain and likely hinders future upgrades. For less defined areas such as cost allocations, there can be a tendency to avoid challenging the status quo. The complexity challenge typically occurs if decisions are made too low in the organization, there is a lack of governance structure, or change-resistant leaders are empowered as FT leads.

The inability to make decisions at the speed required by the transformation program is another challenge. This typically occurs when there is insufficient direction, expertise, or leadership required to make key decisions. This can result in delays and cost overruns as the program gets bogged down in debating decisions. Alternatively, moving too fast can lead to rework loops as closed decisions are reopened. This can be avoided by establishing a North Star vision, staffing with the right talent, having engagement from the right leaders and stakeholders, and reviewing key decisions with the steering committee.

Transformation provides a unique opportunity to tackle many of the toughest long-standing challenges while also building new, next-gen capabilities, but it’s not without challenges. Engaging early in the journey to establish a strategy, a North Star vision, and an integrated transformation road map have shown to be integral to successful outcomes. As your organization embarks on upcoming technology and ERP investments, consider the benefits of controllership taking the reins early on to establish a transformation strategy.

Did you find this useful?