brass compass

Analysis

US Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) implementation insights 

Knowledge, dates and potential implications

For the banking industry, the FASB’s new current expected credit losses (CECL) accounting standard is the most impactful accounting change in over a decade. We can help you prepare.

A collection of insights and dates to help you prepare for CECL’s impact

CECL promises to be one of the most significant accounting projects of the next five years. Right now, it may seem like there is plenty of time to comply with CECL. However, its significance and widespread impact demands banks take an early and disciplined approach to implementation.

As our recent survey of senior executives at 31 US banks reinforced, the new CECL standard will involve and drive changes across numerous facets of your bank’s operations including accounting/finance, IT, risk, the business units, and others. In addition to its major operational implications, CECL is expected to have an equally significant financial impact on impairment estimates, capital ratios, and the volatility of profit and loss.

Banks need to think strategically about CECL’s far-reaching implications and prepare for implementation as soon as possible, lest they fall behind on resource planning and critical deadlines. To help our banking clients get started, Deloitte is sharing its CECL knowledge and insights through a multipart collection of topical perspectives and companion webcasts.

Each of the pairings will address a key area of your business that CECL is likely to impact, with the goal of helping you form a more strategic and comprehensive view of your CECL challenges. From business impact, data management, and credit modeling to risk, governance, and technology, we’ll explore what’s at stake and what you can do to ready your organization for complying with CECL on time and with maximum effectiveness.

 

Listen to the replay of our latest webcast  

CECL implementation insights: Technology impacts

 

CECL implementation dates

  • December 15, 2019: Public business entities that are SEC filers must adopt CECL guidelines for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
  • December 15, 2020: All other public business entities must adopt CECL guidelines for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.

Early adoption is allowed for all entities starting with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018.

Lessons learned from IFRS 9

The first pairing in our series covers valuable lessons from implementations of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and how they can be applied to your CECL compliance planning.

There is much that US-based banks can learn from institutions that prepare financial statements under IFRS and have adopted a similar credit loss model under IFRS 9. These institutions have been preparing for this standard since it was finalized in 2014. They have gained insight from the long implementation cycle that can be helpful to US-based filers—specifically around project governance and modeling decisions. Our webcast and written perspective share valuable insights and lessons on a number of CECL implementation challenges, including the steps financial institutions can take to get started:

  • Face the challenge as a team. IFRS 9 and CECL represent the biggest change in accounting standards since standards were established. All of an organization’s functional areas—business, risk, accounting, modeling, and others—should be aligned and work collaboratively to develop and implement new loss estimation models.
  • Ring-fence resources. Engage early and frequently with business and function heads during planning, development, and implementation.
  • Learn early, fail fast, and do both transparently. Test multiple models and validation techniques within the organization’s existing technology to understand potential limitations.

Back to top

Developing and implementing CECL estimation models

The third webcast and thoughtware pairing in our Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) implementation series examines the key considerations for the successful development and implementation of CECL estimation models.

While the CECL standard is open to interpretation in some respects, there are significant differences between its objectives and those of the current allowance framework. The production of expected credit loss estimates and the related disclosures can be quite complex and place a significant burden on a bank’s infrastructure, processes, and people.

Whether developing a simple or sophisticated CECL estimation model, it is important for banks to understand how the new CECL standard will impact internal functions—namely credit risk, accounting policy, financial reporting, and technology. It is equally critical that they involve these same functions as they modify their existing estimation models or develop new ones.

Our webcast and report explores these considerations in depth and the role they play in designing solutions that are both consistent with the CECL standard and responsive to end users’ needs. We outline the specific steps banks can take to be successful in their CECL estimation modeling efforts—from assessing current allowance processes and leveraging existing data to assembling project teams and defining technology architecture requirements.

CECL technology impacts

The new CECL standard is expected to have far-reaching implications, comprise many moving parts, and play a larger role in supporting business decisions. Its anticipated impact is driving financial institutions to consider replacing their traditional spreadsheets and legacy IT solutions with a more responsive, configurable platform—one with enabling tools and credit model options to sustain a CECL framework.

The fourth webcast and thoughtware pairing in our series examines how CECL may affect a financial institution’s technology needs, approaches, and investments as they move forward with implementation. It also helps institutions understand how they can put in place the right IT structure, capabilities, and governance to make their transition to a modified or new technology platform a successful one.

Finally, we outline the steps an institution should consider as they begin the platform design and development process. These include:

  • Assessing the potential technology and organizational impacts of CECL triggers
  • Conducting thorough due diligence when selecting solution vendors
  • Getting comfortable with the CECL process before the effective date

Related insights

https://author.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Images/promo_images/animals-nature/us-flower-tree-sun.jpg

Putting current expected credit losses (CECL) in perspective

Explore implications of the FASB’s new credit impairment standard

 

https://author.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Images/promo_images/animals-nature/us-spider-web-drawing.jpg

FASB issues final standard on accounting for credit losses

Heads Up

     

2017 US Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) survey

Explore implications of the FASB’s new credit impairment standard

 

Practical insights on implementing IFRS 9 and CECL

ASU 2016-13 and opportunities for implementation efficiencies

Do not delete! This box/component contains css that is needed on this page. This message will not be visible when page is activated.

Did you find this useful?