glass

Perspectives

The ASC 842 leasing standard

On the Radar: A roadmap to adoption and implementation

Lease accounting is like a tale of two cities, with Companies that have adopted ASC 842 in one and those that have not yet adopted the standard in the other. That means some may be more focused on ongoing activity at the FASB and the impacts of COVID-19, while others are still grappling with implementation challenges.

${column-img-description}

This On the Radar applies to both public business entities and non-public business entities and is divided into the following sections on the basis of whether an entity has adopted ASC 842:

  • Lease accounting hot topics for entities that have adopted ASC 842
  • Ongoing accounting standards updates
  • Implementation considerations for entities that have not yet adopted ASC 842

Lease accounting hot topics for entities that have adopted ASC 842

In light of COVID-19, many entities are evaluating their current business structures and related models to adapt. As part of such an assessment, entities may reevaluate where their employees conduct their required business activities and to what extent they will rely on the use of brick-and-mortar real estate assets on a go-forward basis. Specifically, many entities have already initiated (or may soon initiate) a real estate rationalization program to reevaluate their organization wide real estate footprint. The goal of initiating such programs may be for entities to rightsize their real estate portfolios to manage costs while adequately supporting their evolving business needs.

During a March 8, 2021, survey conducted by Deloitte, about 7,700 respondents provided their thoughts on whether and to what extent they plan to initiate or are initiating a real estate rationalization program within their organizations. The chart below depicts the results of the survey.

On the Radar : Leases

We have observed an increase in entities abandoning properties, subleasing space they are no longer using, or modifying existing leases to change the amount of space or the lease term. Further, as a financing method to improve their liquidity, entities are increasingly entering into sale-and-leaseback transactions involving real estate. As a result of these real estate rationalization efforts, companies are also more frequently evaluating leases for impairment. Each of these topics is addressed below (also see Deloitte’s March 30, 2021, Accounting Spotlight for a more detailed discussion).

Ongoing accounting standards updates

Since the issuance of ASU 2016-02 more than five years ago, the FASB has released various ASUs to provide additional transition relief and make certain technical corrections and improvements to the standard.

Most recently, the FASB issued ASU 2021-05, which changed the accounting for lessors of leases with variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate. This new guidance requires a lessor to classify a lease with any variable lease payments as an operating lease at lease commencement if both of the following conditions are met:

  1. The lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or direct financing lease in accordance with the classification criteria in ASC 842-10-25-2 and 25-3, respectively.
  2. The lessor would have recognized a selling loss at lease commencement.

This amendment was designed to eliminate the possibility that an economically profitable arrangement would lead the lessor to recognize a loss at lease inception as a result of the ASC 842 measurement requirements for variable lease payments that are not based on an index or rate.
 

The FASB continues to evaluate stakeholder feedback on the adoption of ASC 842. These evaluation efforts included holding public roundtables in September 2020 to discuss challenges with applying the standard. The FASB also issued an invitation to comment in June 2021 to request feedback on how to refine its broader standard-setting agenda. Stay tuned for future refinements in accounting standard setting as a result of these initiatives.

Implementation considerations for entities that have not yet adopted ASC 842

While the accounting issues discussed above may affect both public and private companies, the accounting implications for those that have adopted ASC 842 may differ from those that are still applying ASC 840.

ASU 2020-05 (issued in June 2020) amended the effective dates of the leasing standard that were previously delayed in ASU 2019-10 (issued in November 2019) to give implementation relief to certain types of entities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. ASU 2020-05 amends the effective dates of ASU 2016-02 as follows:

 

The most significant changes in the new leasing standard are as follows:

  • Lessees record most leases on the balance sheet.
  • Bright-line tests are no longer used to determine lease classification, thus eliminating a potential source of structuring.
  • Certain underlying principles of lessor accounting are aligned with those in ASC 606, the FASB’s revenue standard.
  • Expanded disclosures are required for both lessees and lessors, including the requirement for lessors to provide more transparent information about their exposure to the changes in the value of residual assets as well as how they manage that exposure.

Non-PBEs that have not yet adopted ASC 842 should work with their accounting advisers when dealing with the real estate rationalization topics described in the previous section and throughout the implementation of ASC 842. Further, entities should review the best practices for adoption below.

Critical areas of adoption process

In implementing ASC 842, entities will need to change not only their accounting for and financial reporting of leases but also their related systems and processes. It is important for all entities to develop an implementation plan well before ASC 842’s effective date. Although some of the accounting changes may seem intuitive, the necessary data and systems changes are significant and, without preparation, may be overwhelming.

Phases of implementation

The sections below highlight five phases of adopting ASC 842, including key activities that an entity may perform and factors it may consider to gauge how much time and effort it will take to complete certain steps in the transition process. Although implementation strategies vary, we developed these recommendations on the basis of experiences with public-company implementation. While an entity works toward adoption of ASC 842, the entity’s normal operations do not cease; new leases are entered into, and existing leases are modified or terminated. Accordingly, the adoption of ASC 842 should not be viewed strictly as a linear process.
 

Learn more about lease accounting

Deloitte’s Roadmap for Lease Accounting combines the requirements of the FASB’s leasing standard, ASU 2016-02 (codified as ASC 842), with Deloitte’s interpretations and examples in a comprehensive, reader-friendly format. This publication has been developed for readers who have been following every development of the standard as well as for those who are working through the new guidance for the first time.

group of people under sky at nigth

Contact us

 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yes         No

Fullwidth SCC. Do not delete! This box/component contains JavaScript that is needed on this page. This message will not be visible when page is activated.

Insert Custom HTML fragment. Do not delete! This box/component contains code that is needed on this page. This message will not be visible when page is activated.
+++ DO NOT USE THIS FRAGMENT WITHOUT EXPLICIT APPROVAL FROM THE CREATIVE STUDIO DEVELOPMENT TEAM +++

Insert Custom CSS fragment. Do not delete! This box/component contains code needed on this page. This message will not be visible when page is activated.
+++ DO NOT USE THIS FRAGMENT WITHOUT EXPLICIT APPROVAL FROM THE CREATIVE STUDIO DEVELOPMENT TEAM +++