Multistate tax considerations of the federal tax reform international tax provisions has been added to your bookmarks.
Multistate tax considerations of the federal tax reform international tax provisions
Multistate Tax alert | January 22, 2018
This tax alert highlights some of the most prominent international tax changes created by the Act and the associated multistate tax considerations.
- Transition tax/Deemed repatriation
- Other considerations
- State budgets and legislative responses
- Taxpayer considerations
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed legislation (P.L. 115-97) commonly referred to as “The 2017 Tax Reform Act” (the Act), which is the most comprehensive tax reform legislation passed in over 30 years.1 The Act lowers tax rates on individuals, C corporations, passthrough entities2 and estates. To offset these costs,
The Act’s corporate income tax provisions and
Transition tax/Deemed repatriation
The transition tax requires a US shareholder owning at least 10 percent of the vote of a foreign subsidiary (where there is at least one US corporation that is a 10 percent voting shareholder) to add to its subpart F income the shareholder’s pro rata share of the foreign subsidiary’s net post-1986 historical earnings and profits (E&P), as determined as of November 2, 2017, or December 31, 2017, whichever is higher. This income is to be reported as of the foreign subsidiary’s last tax year beginning before 2018, and is taxed at one of two rates: (1) 15.5 percent for E&P held as cash or cash equivalents; and (2) 8 percent for all other E&P.
The deemed repatriation raises a number of significant state issues, including whether and how the respective states tax subpart F income. The concept behind the deemed repatriation is that once the federal tax is paid on the deemed repatriation, the actual repatriation of these amounts will be tax-free at the federal level. One key issue for companies to consider is, to the extent a particular state does not tax the deemed repatriation, whether such a state will attempt to tax the funds upon their actual repatriation.
Another issue for companies to consider is whether the company has already paid tax on any of this E&P (i.e., by filing a worldwide state income tax return) and, if so, whether a position may exist to exclude the deemed repatriated dividends from income. Another consideration is to what degree the computation of gross income inclusion may differ from the federal computation taking into account combined group composition and/or separate filings.
Further, the potential state tax treatment of this deemed repatriation varies. Some states have a fairly straightforward approach for taxing or exempting the addition to subpart F income.
For example, a rolling (automatic) conformity state may conform to the amended IRC Section 965 immediately upon enactment, whereas states which have a static or lagging conformity approach to the IRC may not explicitly conform to section 965, leaving out the addition, or at a minimum, leaving the conclusion in question. Therefore, state conformity to the IRC—or a lack thereof—can result in varying treatment among the states. As a result, it is important for taxpayers to closely monitor a state’s conformity status.3
The Act also provides that US shareholders of controlled foreign corporations must include in gross income the amount of its global intangible low-taxed income (
For example, the New York Department of Taxation and Finance recently presented to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo a “Preliminary Report on the Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “Report”), in which it attempted to estimate the impact the Act would have on the tax system and economy of the State of New York.4 When analyzing the Act’s international tax provisions, the Report notes that Subpart F income and dividends paid by foreign affiliates to US corporations are “generally not taxed in New York.” With regard to
Although this new GILTI income is treated similarly to Subpart F income, it is specifically not characterized as Subpart F income under the IRC and therefore would not qualify as other exempt income. Thus, the income would flow through to New York, be treated as business income, and be subject to tax.5
With New York weighing in, it is anticipated other state agencies may follow suit soon.
Taxpayers will also need to consider whether the foreign income under the transition tax, GILTI or FDII will be included in the sales factor numerator and/or denominator for apportionment purposes. If the foreign income is treated as a dividend, states may exclude the dividends altogether from the sales factor or only include a portion of the dividend.
Finally, because the Act allows for the repatriation of funds under beneficial terms, it is anticipated that a portion of those funds may be reinvested in the US economy. This is especially true as the Act modifies the IRC section 168 bonus depreciation rules to allow for full expensing of qualified property placed into service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. Accordingly, companies who anticipate repatriating and reinvesting a substantial amount of E&P following the deemed repatriation should consider state and local credits and incentives opportunities for such reinvestment.
State budgets and legislative responses
The Act represents “deficit spending” by the federal government and includes roughly $1.46 trillion in
Each state that imposes income taxes will therefore need to evaluate which provisions of federal tax reform that pertain to the calculation of taxable income to determine if the state can afford to conform to any federal tax provision that would reduce state revenues (or, conversely, if they can afford to disconnect from any revenue-raising provisions included in the Act.)
State conformity to the IRC is generally set by statute, and a summary of each state’s current conformity to the IRC as of January 1, 2018, is attached to this Alert as Appendix A.
States typically address conformity to the IRC through legislation, although certain states may seek to address essential details through administrative guidance as well. Legislative responses are expected throughout 2018, depending upon when each state is in session. Included below is a summary of each state’s 2018 legislative calendar (based on information currently available).
|Jurisdiction||State legislative calendar
|Alabama||January 9, 2018—April 24, 2018
|Alaska||January 16, 2018—May 16, 2018 (Alaska Constitution limits regular legislative sessions to 121 consecutive days; may be extended).
|Arizona||January 8, 2018—April 17, 2018
|Arkansas||February 12, 2018—Will last for 30 days, with the possibility of three-fifteen day extensions
|California||January 3, 2018—August 31, 2018
|Colorado||January 10, 2018—May 9, 2018
|Connecticut||February 7, 2018—May 9, 2018 (dates for regular sessions in even-numbered years set by Connecticut Constitution; session may adjourn prior to final date)
|Delaware||January 9, 2018—June 30, 2018
|District of Columbia||January 2, 2018—December 2018 (generally in session year-round)
|Florida||January 9, 2018—March 9, 2018
|Georgia||January 8, 2018—(no more than 40 working days)
|Hawaii||January 17, 2018—May 3, 2018
|Idaho||January 8, 2018—March 27, 2018
|Illinois||January 23, 2018 (House) and January 30, 2018 (Senate)—May 31, 2018 (both House and Senate)
|Indiana||January 3, 2018—March 14, 2018
|Iowa||January 8, 2018—April 17, 2018
|Kansas||January 8, 2018—April 6, 2018
|Louisiana||March 12, 2018—adjourn no later than June 4, 2018
|Maine||January 3, 2018—April 18, 2018 (may be extended)
|Maryland||January 10, 2018—April 9, 2018
|Massachusetts||January 10, 2018—June 30, 2018 (may be extended into July)
|Michigan||Current session runs through December 2018
|Minnesota||February 20, 2018—May 21, 2018
|Missouri||January 3, 2018—May 18, 2018
|Montana||Montana holds legislative sessions on odd-numbered years so there is not a regular session scheduled for 2018. There is a possibility that the governor could call a special session this year to address the changes.
|Nebraska||January 3, 2018—April 18, 2018
|Nevada||Legislative regular sessions held biennially in odd-numbered years. Special sessions may be called.|
|New Hampshire||January 3, 2018—June 30, 2018
|New Jersey||No fixed legislative period—generally in session
|New Mexico||January 16, 2018—February 15, 2018
|New York||January 2018—June 20, 2018
|North Carolina||January 10, 2018—(approximately) June 30, 2018
||The next regular session will be from January 3, 2019—April 26, 2019
|Ohio||The legislative schedule is set in six-month increments. The last currently scheduled session for the first half of 2018 is June 27, 2018.|
|Oklahoma||February 5, 2018—May 25, 2018, but is currently in a special session
|Oregon||February 5, 2018—March 11, 2018 (date of adjournment sent by Oregon Constitution but may be extended by Legislature)
|Pennsylvania||January 22, 2018—June 29, 2018 (Senate) and June 30, 2018 (House).|
|Rhode Island||January 2, 2018—mid-July, 2018 (estimated)
|South Carolina||January 9, 2018—no later than May 10, 2018
|South Dakota||January 9, 2018—March 26, 2018|
|Tennessee||January 9, 2018—Late April/Early May
|Texas||The next regular session will begin on January 8, 2019
|Utah||January 22, 2018—March 8, 2018
|Vermont||January 3, 2018—May 4, 2018
|Virginia||January 10, 2018—March 10, 2018, with reconvened session to commence on April 18, 2018
|Washington||January 8, 2018—March 8, 2018|
|West Virginia||January 10, 2018—March 10, 2018
|Wisconsin||January 16, 2018—March 22, 2018
|Wyoming||February 12, 2018—March 10, 2018|
While the foregoing is not an exhaustive list of all state tax issues raised by the Act’s international income tax provisions, the summary is intended to provide an overview of the range of state and local tax issues presented. Each taxpayer is encouraged to consider these state and local issues, including the ASC740 implications, when evaluating the impact of the Act on current and prospective tax planning.
If you have overall questions regarding the Act or other tax reform matters, please reach out to one of the following Deloitte Tax professionals:
Valerie Dickerson, Tax partner, Washington National Tax, Multistate Tax Services, Deloitte Tax LLP, Washington DC, +1 202 220 2693
Jerry McTeague, Tax partner, Multistate Tax Services, Tax Reform – West leader, Deloitte Tax LLP, San Jose, +1 408 704 4477
Jason Wyman, Tax partner, Multistate Tax Services, Tax Reform – Central leader, Deloitte Tax LLP, Chicago, +1 312 486 9418
Andrew Gold, Tax partner, Multistate Tax Services, Tax Reform – MTS Technology Tools, Deloitte Tax LLP, Houston, +1 713 982 3598
Scott Schiefelbein, Tax managing director, Washington National Tax, Multistate Tax Services, Deloitte Tax LLP, Portland, +1 503 727 5382
Bob Kovach, Tax senior manager, Multistate Tax Services, Deloitte Tax LLP, Pittsburgh, +1 412 338 7925
You may also wish to reach out to any of the following Deloitte Tax subject matter specialists with questions you may have regarding the multistate tax issues presented by federal tax reform in the specific areas noted below for each Multistate Tax Services specialist:
Multistate Tax Services – Intn’l Tax Issues
Sarah Murray, Tax principal, Deloitte Tax LLP, Houston, +1 713 982 2547
Chris Campbell, Tax principal, Deloitte Tax LLP, Los Angeles, +1 213 553 3072
Timing and Basis Review
Ed Kenawell, Tax principal, Deloitte Tax LLP, Pittsburgh, +1 412 338 7884
Pass-through Entity Taxation
Greg Bergmann, Tax partner, Deloitte Tax LLP, Chicago, +1 312 486 9811
Multistate Tax Services – Refund Reviews
Kristen Cove, Tax partner, Deloitte Tax LLP, Charlotte, +1 704 884 1621
Credits and Incentives
Kevin Potter, Tax managing director, Deloitte Tax LLP, New York, +1 212 492 3630
Credits and Incentives
Linda Bonelli, Tax partner, Deloitte Tax LLP, Chicago, +1 312 486 2716
Kent Clay, Tax managing director, Deloitte Tax LLP, Charlotte, +1 704 227 7956
Jeff Corser, Tax managing director, Deloitte Tax LLP, Charlotte, +1 704 227 1453
Multistate Tax alert archive
The Multistate Tax alert archive includes external tax alerts issued by Deloitte Tax LLP's Multistate Tax practice during the last three years. These external alerts highlight selected developments involving state tax legislative, judicial, and administrative matters. The alerts provide a brief summary of specific multistate developments relevant to taxpayers, tax professionals, and other interested persons.
View the list of archived Multistate Tax alerts.
1 The Tax Reform Act’s official name is, “An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018.”
2 The Act effectively reduces the tax burden paid by the owners of passthrough entities (e.g., partnerships, S corporations, etc.) by a) creating a new 20 percent deduction for “qualified business income” and b) reducing the rates imposed on individuals and C corporations.
3 A summary of each state’s conformity to the IRC as of January 1, 2018 is attached to this Alert as Appendix A.
5 Preliminary Report at p. 30.